uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
Refine search result
123 1 - 50 of 121
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Andersson, Magnus
    et al.
    Cajoma Consulting, Uppsala.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Säkerhet och avvägningar i de fyra trafikslagen2010Report (Other academic)
  • 2. Belin, Mats-Åke
    et al.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Meleckidzedeck, Khayesi
    Tingvall, Claes
    Carrots, sticks and sermons: state policy tools for influencing adoption and acceptance of new vehicle safety systems2014In: Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement and Optimisation / [ed] Michael A. Regan, Tim Horberry, Alan Stevens, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2014, p. 241-250Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 3. Belin, Matts-Åke
    et al.
    Tillgren, Per
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Vision Zero: a road safety policy innovation2012In: International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, ISSN 1745-7300, E-ISSN 1745-7319, Vol. 19, no 2, p. 171-179Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The aim of this paper is to examine Sweden's Vision Zero road safety policy. In particular, the paper focuses on how safety issues were framed, which decisions were made, and what are the distinctive features of Vision Zero. The analysis reveals that the decision by the Swedish Parliament to adopt Vision Zero as Sweden's road safety policy was a radical innovation. The policy is different in kind from traditional traffic safety policy with regard to problem formulation, its view on responsibility, its requirements for the safety of road users, and the ultimate objective of road safety work. The paper briefly examines the implications of these findings for national and global road safety efforts that aspire to achieving innovative road safety policies in line with the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020, declared by the United Nations General Assembly in March 2010.

  • 4.
    Belin, Matts-Åke
    et al.
    Karolinska Institute, Department of Public Health Sciences and Swedish Transport Administrations.
    Tillgren, Per
    Karolinska Institute, Department of Public Health Sciences and Mälardalen University.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Cameron, Max
    Monash University, Accident Research Centre.
    Tingvall, Claes
    Swedish Transport Administration and Monash Universite, Accident Research Centre.
    Speed Cameras in Sweden and Victoria, Australia: A case study2010In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, ISSN 0001-4575, E-ISSN 1879-2057, Vol. 42, no 6, p. 2165-2170Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In this article, the ideas behind two different speed camera systems in Australia, Victoria, and Sweden are explored and compared. The study shows that even if the both systems technically have the same aim – to reduce speeding – the ideas of how that should be achieved differ substantially. The approach adopted in Victoria is based on the concept that speeding is a deliberate offence in which a rational individual wants to drive as fast as possible and is prepared to calculate the costs and benefits of his behaviour. Therefore, the underlying aim of the intervention is to increase the perceived cost of committing an offence whilst at the same time decrease the perceived benefits, so that the former outweigh the latter. The Swedish approach, on the other hand, appears to be based on a belief that road safety is an important priority for the road users and one of the reasons to why road users drive too fast is lack of information and social support.

    In order to evaluate road safety interventions and how their effects are created together with the ambition to transfer technology, there is a need for a comprehensive understanding of the systems and their modi operandi in their specific contexts. This study has shown that there are major differences between the ideas behind the two speed camera programs in Victoria, Australia and Sweden and that these ideas have an impact on the actual design of the different systems and how these are intended to create road safety effects.

  • 5. Bjurulf, S.
    et al.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Larsson, C. G. G.
    A triangulation approach to impact evaluation2013In: Evaluation, ISSN 1356-3890, E-ISSN 1461-7153, Vol. 19, no 1, p. 56-73Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article presents a viable method to overcome the challenge of producing reliable cause-effect findings in impact evaluation. The Measuring Cluster Effects through Triangulation method (MCET) involves methodological triangulation. Three designs - shadow controls, generic controls, and process tracing - are combined to shed light on causality. When these three approaches are triangulated, cause-effect findings will be more reliable. The MCET combination is a feasible alternative when randomized controlled trials and matched controls are impossible or impracticable. It is also an alternative to using a single non-experimental design, particularly in situations where expenditure is great and the causality issue is pressing. In this article, the MCET approach is illustrated by information drawn from a set of evaluations performed on the activities of the Compare Foundation, a cluster organization in Sweden in the Information and Communication Technology sector. Regionally based in Karlstad, County Värmland, and founded in 2000, the Compare cluster organization has adapted the MCET to its own activities.

  • 6. Bjurulf, Staffan
    et al.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Do public interventions for innovation hit their targets?: Evaluating cluster organisations in Northern Central Sweden2009Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 7.
    Bjurulf, Staffan
    et al.
    Region Värmland.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Larsson, C. G.
    Care of Measuring Cluster Effects: A Triangulation Approach to the Problem of Intervention Effects2012Report (Other academic)
  • 8. Bjørnholt, Bente
    et al.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Brugerevaluering2016In: Evaluering af offentlig politik og administration / [ed] Bredgaard, Thomas, Köpenhamn: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 2016, p. 263-283Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 9. Dyhr-Mikkelsen, Kirsten
    et al.
    Birr-Pedersen, Preben
    Togeby, Mikael
    Rieper, Olaf
    Kristensen, Thorkild
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Larsen, Anders
    Håndbog i evaluering af energispareaktiviteter: Udarbejdet for Energistyrelsen, ELFOR, Elsparefonden, Naturgasselskaberne og Fjernvarmeselskaberne2003Report (Other academic)
  • 10. Forss, Kim
    et al.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Kruse, Stein Erik
    Mwaiselage, Agnes
    Nilsdotter, Anna
    Are Sida Evaluations Good Enough?: An Assessment of 34 Evaluation Reports2008Book (Other academic)
  • 11. Hansen, Morten Balle
    et al.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University.
    Fælles sprog i ældreplejens organisering: Evaluering af et standardiseret kategorisystem (Common Language in Care for the Elderly: Evaluation of a Standardized Category System)2005Book (Refereed)
  • 12.
    Hansen, Morten Balle
    et al.
    University of Southern Denmark.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Theory-Based Stakeholder Evaluation2010In: American Journal of Evaluation, ISSN 1098-2140, E-ISSN 1557-0878, Vol. 31, no 3, p. 295-313Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article introduces a new approach to program theory evaluation called theory-based stakeholder evaluation or the TSE model for short. Most theory-based approaches are program theory driven and some are stakeholder oriented as well. Practically, all of the latter fuse the program perceptions of the various stakeholder groups into one unitary program theory. The TSE model keeps the program theories of the diverse stakeholder groups apart from each other and from the program theory embedded in the institutionalized intervention itself. This represents, the authors argue, an important clarification and extension of the standard theory-based evaluation. The TSE model is elaborated to enhance theory-based evaluation of interventions characterized by conflicts and competing program theories. The authors argue that especially in evaluations of complex and complicated multilevel and multisite interventions, the presence of competing theories is likely and the TSE model may prove useful.

  • 13.
    Hertting, Nils
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Units outside the University, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Units outside the University, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Bilaga 1 "Storstadspolitikens utvärderingar" (Metropolitan Policy Evaluations), Bilaga 2 "Utvärdering av nätverksstyrning (Evaluation in Network Management), Bilaga 3 "Fallstudier som redskap vid utvärdering" (Case Studies av Tools of Evaluation)2005Report (Other scientific)
  • 14.
    Hertting, Nils
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Den utvärderingstäta politiken: Styrning och utvärdering i svensk storstadspolitik2009 (ed. 1. uppl.)Book (Other academic)
  • 15.
    Hertting, Nils
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Evaluation in Network Governance2011Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 16.
    Hertting, Nils
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Fallstudier som redskap för utvärdering (The case study as a tool for evaluation)2005Report (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 17.
    Hertting, Nils
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Purposes and criteria in network governance evaluation: How far does standard evaluation vocabulary takes us?2012In: Evaluation, ISSN 1356-3890, E-ISSN 1461-7153, Vol. 18, no 1, p. 25-44Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Evaluation and network governance are both among the top-10 trendy concepts in public policy. But how are they related? In the present article, we ask how public sector interventions guided by a network governance doctrine are to be evaluated. If evaluation means systematic judgment of organization, content, administration, outputs and effects in public policy, then evaluators need concepts and analytical tools to assess these features and communicate their analyses. In the literature, interest in network modes of governance often goes together with a call for a renewed vocabulary for evaluation and policy analysis. In the article, we do not take this to be a fact. Instead we turn it into a question: How relevant and productive are established concepts and tools of evaluation theory for evaluating network governance? More specifically, we address the issues of purposes and merit criteria in evaluation of interventions fashioned according to the network governance doctrine. Though it takes some elaboration, our overall conclusion is that at least some standard evaluation concepts and approaches are still productive in delineating, analysing and prescribing how network governance can be evaluated. There are crucial accountability issues to raise, the goal-achievement criterion is not irrelevant and the meaning of stakeholder evaluation is elucidated when confronted with the ideas of the network governance doctrine.

  • 18.
    Hertting, Nils
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Storstadspolitikens utvärderingar (Metropolitan policy evaluations)2005Report (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 19.
    Hertting, Nils
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Utvärdering i mål- och resultatstyrning, nätverksstyrning och brukarstyrning (Evaluation in Management by Objectives and Results, Network Management and Client-oriented Management)2005Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 20.
    Hertting, Nils
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Utvärdering och styrningslogik i den svenska storstadspolitiken (Evaluation and governing logics in the Swedish metropolitan policy)2006In: Evalueringsnyt, no 10, p. 8-14Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 21.
    Hildén, M
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Lepola, J
    Mickwitz, P
    Mulders, A
    Palosaari, M
    Similä, J
    Sjöblom, S
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Evaluation of Environmental Policy Instruments: A Case Study of the Finnish Pulp & Paper & Chemical Industries2002Book (Refereed)
  • 22. Johansson, Kerstin
    et al.
    Denvall, Verner
    Evert, Vedung
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    After the NPM Wave: Evidence-Based Practice and the Vanishing Client2015In: Offentlig Förvaltning. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, ISSN 2000-8058, E-ISSN 2001-3310, Vol. 19, no 2, p. 69-88Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Over the last two decades, a movement for Evidence-Based Management (EBM) has surfaced across the Atlantic world with pretensions of being a successor of New Public Management (NPM). In this paper, we focus on Swedish social welfare as an arena where persistent government attempts have been made to implement locally new evidence-based ideas, specifically evidence-based practice (EBP). In Swedish discourse, the meaning of “evidence-based” is contested. One interpretation maintains that best (and only acceptable) evidence comes from the use of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Another interpretation maintains that evidence from research constitutes only one leg of a multi-factorial definition; that is, this view contends that RCT evidence should be considered along with experience of practitioners and clients (users). Although client participation was an important tenet in the incipient attempts to implement EBP, by using translation theory this article will show that later attempts have tended to ignore the client’s perspective. From this foundation, we address why client views and outlooks have been ignored in EBP implementation.

  • 23.
    Petersson, Gustav Jakob
    et al.
    Institutionen för tillämpad utbildningsvetenskap, Umeå universitet.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Rezension zu: Stockmann, Reinhard, 2006, Evaluation und Qualitätsentwicklung: Eine Grundlage für wirkungsorientiertes Qualitätsmanagement2007In: Zeitschrift für Evaluation, no 1, p. 155-157Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 24.
    Svärd, Sven-Erik
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Antecipering i implementeringsprocesser2008In: Statsvetare ifrågasätter: Uppsalamiljön vid tiden för professorsskftet den 31 mars 2008, 2008, p. 234-249Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 25. Sölvell, Örjan
    et al.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Cluster Program Evaluation2009In: Clusters: Balancing Evolutionary and Constructive Forces, Stockholm: Ivory Tower Publishers , 2009, p. 81-108Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 26.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    50 år idéanalys:: Med en inbjudan till crowdsourcing.  Title in English: 50 Years Ideational Analysis: With an Invitation to Crowdsourcing2018In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 120, no 2, p. 143-153Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 27.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    A Forerunner, not a Freerider: Sweden and the Implementatino of the Global Ozone Protection Regime2003Conference paper (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 28.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    An Irony of History or the Exception as the Rule: The Implementation by Swedish Municipalities of an Economic Housing Policy Instrument2001In: Scandinavian Political Studies, ISSN 0080-6757, E-ISSN 1467-9477, Vol. 24, no 1, p. 67-94Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Perverse effects and ironies should be at the center of attention in academic public policy analysis. A ‘perverse effect’ is not any inadvertent result produced by a public measure but a result, inside or outside the target area, that is entirely opposite to the result intended. An ‘irony’, as defined here, is different from a perverse effect in that it designates any unintended and unexpected result whose causes are unknown or left without comment. The pronouncement ‘this is an irony’ means ‘this is an unexpected result’; the statement ‘this is a perverse effect’ means ‘this is an unexpected, diametrically opposite result at least partly produced by the intervention’ (Vedung 1998a. Utvärdering i politik och förvaltning. Lund: Studentlitteratur, p. 62).

    The article deals with the ironic result of an economic policy instrument in Swedish national housing land policy, the Land Stipulation Requisite for State Housing Loans 1974–91. The purpose of the requisite was that the pertinent municipality (not a private landowner) must have allocated to the building commissioner the land for his planned residential development if he was to be granted state housing loans.

    The policy makers expected that the share of the total housing production taking place on land supplied by municipalities would increase. Yet between 1972 and 1990 the housing production on land supplied by municipal authorities decreased. This puzzling gap, referred to as the ‘enigmatic irony’ of the Land Stipulation Requisite, is explained. The explanation is phrased in the terminology of a general theory of public intervention results. The explanation may be summarized as ‘exception as the rule’.

  • 29.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Arviointiaallon muodot ja suunnat2004In: Yhteiskuntapolitiikka, ISSN 1458-6118, Vol. 69, no 3, p. 242-250Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 30.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Arviointiaalto ja sen liikkeelle panevat voimat (The Evaluation Wave, its Forms and Driving Forces) Stakesin Sosiaalipalvelujen Evaluaatioryhmä Finsoc No. 2003:22003Report (Other academic)
  • 31.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Autonomy and street-level bureaucrats’ coping strategies2015In: Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, Vol. 2Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Frontline practitioners like teachers in public-sector education systems are not policy takers but policy makers, according to Michael Lipsky’s seminal treatise Street-Level Bureaucracy, first published in 1980. They make policy by using their wide autonomy to adopt coping mechanisms, such as limiting client demand and creaming (cherry-picking). Winter and Nielsen have developed this into (1) reducing demand for output, (2) rationing output and (3) automating output. These distinctions are briefly clarified in the article. Do they have relevance for school systems and other Nordic public-sector frontline activities? The question is raised but left to upcoming research to clarify.

  • 32.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Bieffekter, perversa effekter och andra egendomliga effekter av offentliga interventioner2013In: Att fånga effekter i program och projekt / [ed] Lennart Svensson, Göran Brulin, SVen Jansson & Karin Sjöberg, Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2013, p. 35-60Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [sv]

    Stora projekt som finansieras av EU utvärderas alltid. Men är dessa utvärderingar rättvisande? Letar man efter de verkliga och hållbara effekterna? Att fånga effekter av stora projekt är en svår uppgift. Inte minst beror det på att verkningarna kan vara av många olika slag - oväntade, icke avsedda, överraskande, dolda och ibland utanför målområdet. Det gör det inte mindre angeläget: dessa effekter kan vara viktigare än de planerade, avsedda och förväntade. I denna bok beskrivs resultatet av ett flertal analyser av utvecklings­arbete i stora projekt och program - i organisationer, på regional nivå, i nationella program med mera. Slutsatserna dras från teoretiska analyser samt från en lång rad empiriska studier. Boken vänder sig till forskare, regionalt utvecklingsansvariga och myndighetsföreträdare. Den kan användas i utbildning av olika slag - inom flera områden i högskolan och till projektledare, utvärderare, följeforskare och finansiärer samt projektägare.

  • 33.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Bocken som örtagårdsmästare (: Tillsyn genom enskilda i ozonskyddspolitiken2005In: Konflikter, samarbete, resultat: Perspektiv på svensk miljöpolitik, Brottby: Kassandra , 2005, p. 201-223Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 34.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Connecting People:: Om Tuija Lindqvist-Kotiranta som kopplare2014In: Matkalla arvioinnin ja aktivoinnin maailmaan: Tuijan kanssa / [ed] Karjalainen, Pekka & Kivipelto, Minna, Helsinki: Gummerus Kirjapaino Oy, 2014, p. 79-92Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 35.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Den utvärdera(n)de staten: Utvärderingens institutionalisering på den högre utbildningens område (The evaluating state: Institutionalization of evaluation in Swedish higher education) anmälan av Anette Gröjers doktorsavhandling2005In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 107, no 4, p. 409-422Article, book review (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 36.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Det handlade om demokratin (It Was About Democracy: The 1905 Union Dissolution in Swedish Liberal Newspapers): Unionsupplösningen i liberal press2005In: Stridsfrågor och stilbildare (Liberal Press in 100 Years of Public Debate): liberal press i 100 års samhällsdebatt, Uppsala: Uppsala Publishing House , 2005, p. 73-97Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 37.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Det högaktiva avfallets väg till den rikspolitiska dagordningen (The Road of High-level Nuclear Waste to the National Political Agenda in Sweden)2005In: Kärnavfallets politiska utmaningar (Political Challenges of Nuclear Waste), Hedemora: Gidlund , 2005, p. 33-56Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 38.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Det rationella politiska samtalet: Hur politiska budskap tolkas, ordnas och prövas1977Book (Refereed)
  • 39.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Ett sekel, fem vattenkraftsregimer (One Century, Five Water-power Regimes)2002In: Kraft ur vatten - hållbar vattenkraft: en dokumentation från Edbergseminariet 2002 (Power from Water - Sustainable Water Power: a Documentation from the Edberg Seminar), Karlstad: Karlstads universitet, Edbergstiftelsen , 2002, p. 49-78Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 40.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Evaluating Network Governance: The Metropolitan Initiative in Sweden 1998-20062010Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 41.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Evaluation as megatrend and gigatrend2008Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 42. Vedung, Evert
    Evaluation Models and the Welfare Sector:  2003In: Perspectives, models and methods in evaluating the welfare sector: a Nordic approach / [ed] Julkunen, Ilse, Helsinki: Stakes, FinSoc , 2003, p. 13-39Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 43.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Evaluation of Project-oriented Network Management2003Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 44.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Evaluation Research2006In: Handbook of Public Policy / [ed] B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre, London: Sage , 2006, p. 397-416Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 45.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Evaluation Research and Fundamental Research2006In: Evaluationsforschung: Grundlagen und ausgewählte Forschungsfelder / [ed] Reinhard Stockmann, Münster: Waxmann Verlag, 2006, 3. Auflage, p. 113-136Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 46.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Evaluation Research and Fundamental Research2004In: Evaluationsforschung: Grundlagen und ausgewählte Forschungsfelder, 2004, p. 111-134Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 47.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Evaluation research and fundamental research2000In: Evaluationsforschung: Grundlagen und ausgewählte Forschungsfelder / [ed] Stockmann, Reinhard, Opladen: Leske + Budrich , 2000, p. 103-126Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 48.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Evaluering som udvikling2009In: Cepra-striben: Tidsskrift for evaluering i praksis, ISSN 1903-8143, no 4, p. 8-13Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 49.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Fire evalueringsbølger2016In: Evaluering af offentlig politik og administration / [ed] Bredgaard, Thomas, Köpenhamn: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 2016, p. 37-68Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 50.
    Vedung, Evert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
    Five Strategies for Enhancing Evaluation Use: A Simple Exercise2016Conference paper (Other academic)
123 1 - 50 of 121
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf