uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 36 of 36
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the 'Create feeds' function.
  • 1.
    Eriksson, Stefan
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Helgesson, Gert
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
    Provide expertise or facilitate ethical reflection? A comment on the debate between Cowley and Crosthwaite2006In: Medicine, Health care and Philosophy, ISSN 1386-7423, E-ISSN 1572-8633, Vol. 9, no 3, p. 389-392Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 2. Savage-Rumbaugh, ES
    et al.
    Segerdahl, P
    Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
    Individual Differences in Laungage-Competencies in Apes Resulting From Unique Rearing Conditions Imposed by Different First Epistemplogies2005Book (Other (popular scientific, debate etc.))
  • 3. Savage-Rumbaugh, S
    et al.
    Fields, W
    Segerdahl, P
    Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
    Culture Prefigures Cognition in Pan/Homo Bonobos2005In: Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, Vol. 54, p. 311-328Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 4.
    Segerdahl, P
    Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
    Djuren vantrivs i naturen2005In: Svenska DagbladetArticle in journal (Other (popular scientific, debate etc.))
  • 5.
    Segerdahl, P
    Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
    Evolutionsläran som fostrare av tanken2003In: Svenska DaglbadetArticle in journal (Other (popular scientific, debate etc.))
  • 6.
    Segerdahl, P
    Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
    Is languange something that we learn?2001In: Current Anthropology, Vol. 42, p. 503-504Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 7.
    Segerdahl, P
    Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
    Kulturen är evolutionens turbomotor2001In: Svenska DagbladetArticle in journal (Other (popular scientific, debate etc.))
  • 8.
    Segerdahl, P
    Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
    Miljön som lär apor tala och skriva2001In: Svenska DagbladetArticle in journal (Other (popular scientific, debate etc.))
  • 9.
    Segerdahl, P
    Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
    Ädelmodiga djur och människans bestialiska natur2006In: Svenska Dagbladet: Under strecket, no 16 decemberArticle in journal (Other (popular scientific, debate etc.))
  • 10.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Gender Research.
    Being humans when we are animals2014In: Nordic Wittgenstein Review, ISSN 2194-6825, E-ISSN 2242-248X, ISSN 2242-248X, Vol. 3, no 2, p. 125-149Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This paper investigates forms of metaphysical vertigo that can appear when contrasts between humans and animals are challenged. Distinguishing three forms of vertigo and four ways of differentiating humans and animals, the paper attempts to achieve a perspicuous representation of what could be termed “the difficulty of being humans when we are animals”; or alternatively, “the difficulty of being animals when we are humans”.

  • 11.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
    Can natural behavior be cultivated? The farm as local human/animal culture2007In: Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, ISSN 1187-7863, E-ISSN 1573-322X, Vol. 20, no 2, p. 167-193Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Although the notion of natural behavior occurs in many policy-making and legal documents on animal welfare, no consensus has been reached concerning its definition. This paper argues that one reason why the notion resists unanimously accepted definition is that natural behavior is not properly a biological concept, although it aspires to be one, but rather a philosophical tendency to perceive animal behavior in accordance with certain dichotomies between nature and culture, animal and human, original orders and invented artifacts. The paper scrutinizes the philosophy of natural behavior as it developed in the organic movement in response to a perceived contrast between industrialized and traditional agriculture. There are two reasons for focusing on the organic movement: (i) the emphasis on “the natural” is most accentuated there and has a long history, (ii) everyday life on organic farms presupposes human/animal interplay, which conflicts with the philosophical tendency to separate nature from culture. This mismatch between theory and practice helps us see why, and how, the philosophy of natural behavior needs to be reconsidered. The paper proposes that we understand farms as local human/animal cultures, and asks what we can mean my natural behavior in such contexts. Since domestic animals adapt to agricultural environments via interaction with caretakers, such interplay is analyzed as “hub” in these animals’ natural behavior.

  • 12.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy.
    Conversation Analysis as Rigorous Science2003In: Discussing Conversation Analysis: The Work of Emanuel A. Schegloff / [ed] Thibault, P.J. and Prevignano, C., Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003, p. 91-108Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 13.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy.
    Critique of Pure Capacity: Searle and the Background1994In: Philosophical investigations (Print), ISSN 0190-0536, E-ISSN 1467-9205, Vol. 17, p. 507-535Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 14.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy.
    Djuren i kulturen.: Hur naturligt kan våra husdjur leva?2009Book (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Är djuren fast i sin uråldriga natur, medan människan är fri, modern och kulturellt föränderlig? Syndar vi mot gamla Moder Natur, när vi för in djuren i kulturens samtida virrvarr: När vi lär schimpanser språk, övar hundar att leta narkotika, eller vänjer kor vid mjölkningsrobotar? Borde vi helst återbörda djuren till deras naturliga evighetsrike, så att de återigen får bete sig naturligt? Och om vi inte klarar oss utan dem, borde vi åtminstone se till att våra husdjur får leva så naturligt som möjligt? – Men vad är naturligt för ett husdjur?

     

    I den här boken undersöker Pär Segerdahl, filosof verksam vid Uppsala universitet, våra bilder av djuriskt kontra mänskligt. Att filosofera är att tänka om hur vi tänker. Denna bok handlar därför i viss mening mer om oss själva än om djurens beteenden. Att läsa den ska vara att som i en spegel få syn på hittills omedvetna antaganden, som låst vårt tänkande om natur och kultur. Därmed utforskas samtidigt möjligheten av andra och bättre sätt att tänka, där människan inte ensidigt förknippas med kultur, och djuren inte enbart med natur, utan där vi är i grunden samma slags levande varelser, med en gemensam framtid.

  • 15.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy. Faculty of Languages, Department of Linguistics.
    Does Our Use of Indexicals Require Explanation?1999In: Philosophical Crumbs, 1999, p. 209-218Chapter in book (Other scientific)
  • 16.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Gender Research.
    Gender, Language and Philosophical Reconciliation: What Does Judith Butler Destabilize?2013In: Ethics and the Philosophy of Culture: Wittgensteinian Approaches / [ed] Ylva Gustafsson, Camilla Kronqvist, Hannes Nyan1n, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013, p. 172-211Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 17.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Gender Research.
    Human-Enculturated Apes: Towards a New Sythesis of Philosophy and Comparative Psychology2012In: Crossing Boundaries: Investigating Human-Animal Relationships / [ed] Birke, L. and Hockenhull, J., Leiden and Boston: Brill Academic Publishers, 2012, p. 139-160Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 18.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Gender Research.
    Humanizing Nonhumans: Ape Language Research as Critique of Metaphysics2012In: Language, Ethics and Animal Life: Wittgenstein and Beyond / [ed] Forsberg, N.,Burley, M., and Hämäläinen, N., New York and London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2012, p. 16-31Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 19.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy. Faculty of Languages, Department of Linguistics.
    Language Use. A Philosophical Investigation into the Basic Notions of Pragmatics1996Book (Refereed)
  • 20.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy. Faculty of Languages, Department of Linguistics.
    Linguistic Theory and Actual Language1995In: Language & Communication. An interdisciplinary journal, ISSN 0271-5309, Vol. 15, no 1, p. 31-42Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 21.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy. Faculty of Languages, Department of Linguistics.
    Metafysik och språkkritik (Metaphysics and Linguistic Criticism)1995In: Filosofisk tidskrift (National Journal of Philosophy), no 2, p. 9-21Article in journal (Other scientific)
  • 22.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy. Faculty of Languages, Department of Linguistics.
    Om svårigheten att kritiskt betrakta sina egna övertygelser (On the difficulty of reconsidering one's own convictions)1995In: Filosofisk tidskrift (National Journal of Philosophy), no 2, p. 30-32Article in journal (Other scientific)
  • 23.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy. Faculty of Languages, Department of Linguistics.
    Scientific Studies of Aspects of Everyday Life. The Example of Conversation Analysis1998In: Language & Communication. An interdisciplinary journal, ISSN 0271-5309, Vol. 18, no 4, p. 275-323Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 24.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy. Faculty of Languages, Department of Linguistics.
    Språkteorier och språkspel (Language Theories and Language Games)1998Book (Refereed)
  • 25.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Gender Research.
    The rhetoric and prose of the human/animal contrast2015In: Language & Communication, ISSN 0271-5309, E-ISSN 1873-3395, Vol. 42, p. 36-49Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The opposition in philosophy between humans as thinkers and animals as non-thinkers is often considered to stem from anthropocentrism. In this paper I try to demonstrate that philosophers don't really place "us" at the centre, but rather their own thinking and the philosophical language they develop as thinkers. The human/animal contrast functions rhetorically to communicate that philosophical self-centredness to an audience that recognises itself as "human." I try to dismantle the contrast between humans and animals by exposing what I see as its true core: forgetfulness of how philosophical language (and thinking in that language) is generated by idealisation and sublimation of the reflexive uses of language.

  • 26.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Thinking about ethics: A collection of reflections from the Ethics Blog2014Book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 27.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Tänker om etik: En samling reflektioner från Etikbloggen2014Book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 28.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Gender Research.
    Undisciplined Animals: Invitations to Animal Studies2011Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 29.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy. Faculty of Languages, Department of Linguistics.
    Varför exempel är intressanta i filosofin (Why examples are interesting in philosophy)1999In: Filosofisk tidskrift (National Journal of Philosophy), ISSN 0348-7482, Vol. 20, no 4, p. 15-16Article in journal (Other scientific)
  • 30.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy. Faculty of Languages, Department of Linguistics.
    William James och vårt vanliga språk (William James and Our Ordinary Language)1998In: Vidgade perspektiv. Meditationer över diverse filosofihistoriska ämnen, 1998, p. 153-162Chapter in book (Other scientific)
  • 31.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy.
    Wittgenstein, Meursault and the Difficulty of Philosophy2002In: The Practice of Language / [ed] Gustafsson, M. and Hertzberg, L., Dortrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002, p. 201-212Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 32.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
    Fields, William
    Savage-Rumbaugh, Sue
    Kanzi's Primal Language. The Cultural Initiation of Primates into Language.2005Book (Other scientific)
  • 33.
    Viberg, Jennifer
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Hansson, Mats G.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Langenskiöld, Sophie
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Economics.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Gender Research.
    Incidental Findings: The Time Is not yet Ripe for a Policy for Biobanks2015In: Ethics, Law and Governance of Biobanking: National, European and International Approaches / [ed] Mascalzoni, Deborah, Springer, 2015Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 34.
    Viberg, Jennifer
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Hansson, Mats G.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Langenskiöld, Sophie
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Economics.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Incidental findings: the time is not yet ripe for a policy for biobanks2014In: European Journal of Human Genetics, ISSN 1018-4813, E-ISSN 1476-5438, Vol. 22, no 4, p. 437-441Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Incidental findings (IFs) are acknowledged to be among the most important ethical issues to consider in biobank research. Genome-wide association studies and disease-specific genetic research might reveal information about individual participants that are not related to the research purpose, but may be relevant to those participants' future health. In this article, we provide a synopsis of arguments for and against the disclosure of IFs in biobank research. We argue that arguments that do not distinguish between communications about pathogenic conditions and complex genetic risk for diseases fail, as preferences and decisions may be far more complex in the latter case. The principle of beneficence, for example, often supports the communication of incidentally discovered diseases, but if communication of risk is different, the beneficence of such communication is not equally evident. By conflating the latter form of communication with the former, the application of ethical principles to IFs in biobank research sometimes becomes too easy and frictionless. Current empirical surveys of people's desire to be informed about IFs do not provide sufficient guidance because they rely on the same notion of risk communication as a form of communication about actual health and disease. Differently designed empirical research and more reflection on biobank research and genetic risk information is required before ethical principles can be applied to support the adoption of a reasonable and comprehensive policy for handling IFs.

  • 35.
    Viberg, Jennifer
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Hösterey Ugander, Ulrika
    Clinical Genetics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital.
    Hansson, M G
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Langenskiöld, Sophie
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Economics. Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet..
    Making sense of genetic risk: A qualitative focus-group study of healthy participants in genomic research2017In: Patient Education and Counseling, ISSN 0738-3991, E-ISSN 1873-5134Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Objective

    It is well known that research participants want to receive genetic risk information that is about high risks, serious diseases and potential preventive measures. The aim of this study was to explore, by qualitative means, something less well known: how do healthy research participants themselves make sense of genetic risk information?

    Method

    A phenomenographic approach was chosen to explore research participants’ understanding and assessment of genetic risk. We conducted four focus-group (N = 16) interviews with participants in a research programme designed to identify biomarkers for cardiopulmonary disease.

    Results

    Among the research participants, we found four ways of understanding genetic risk: as a binary concept, as an explanation, as revealing who I am (knowledge of oneself) and as affecting life ahead.

    Conclusion

    Research participants tend to understand genetic risk as a binary concept. This does not necessarily imply a misunderstanding of, or an irrational approach to, genetic risk. Rather, it may have a heuristic function in decision-making.

    Practical implications

    Risk communication may be enhanced by tailoring the communication to the participants’ own lay conceptions. For example, researchers and counselors should address risk in binary terms, maybe looking out for how individual participants search for threshold figures.

  • 36.
    Viberg, Jennifer
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Segerdahl, Pär
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Langenskiöld, Sophie
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Economics.
    Hansson, Mats G
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
    Freedom of Choice about Incidental Findings can frustrate participants’ true preferences2016In: Bioethics, ISSN 0269-9702, E-ISSN 1467-8519, Vol. 30, no 3, p. 203-209Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Ethicists, regulators and researchers have struggled with the question of whether incidental findings in genomics studies should be disclosed to participants. In the ethical debate, a general consensus is that disclosed information should benefit participants. However, there is no agreement that genetic information will benefit participants, rather it may cause problems such as anxiety. One could get past this disagreement about disclosure of incidental findings by letting participants express their preferences in the consent form. We argue that this freedom of choice is problematic.

    In transferring the decision to participants, it is assumed that participants will understand what they decide about and that they will express what they truly want. However, psychological findings about people's reaction to probabilities and risk have been shown to involve both cognitive and emotional challenges. People change their attitude to risk depending on what is at stake. Their mood affects judgments and choices, and they over- and underestimate probabilities depending on whether they are low or high. Moreover, different framing of the options can steer people to a specific choice.

    Although it seems attractive to let participants express their preferences to incidental findings in the consent form, it is uncertain if this choice enables people to express what they truly prefer. In order to better understand the participants' preferences, we argue that future empirical work needs to confront the participant with the complexity of the uncertainty and the trade-offs that are connected with the uncertain predictive value of genetic risk information.

1 - 36 of 36
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf