uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 24 of 24
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Bengtsson, Fredrik
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    ANT-Maps: Visualising Perspectives of Business and Information Systems2013In: ICIS 2013 Proceedings, 2013Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In the IS-literature, graphical representations often accompany Actor Network Theory (ANT) analyses of IS-initiatives, serving as tools for improving visibility of the case and interest and power of actors. Building on a comprehensive literature survey, we identify a gap in existing visualisation approaches, as these mainly focus on offering visual support of the case. We present a visualisation approach and a generic, precise and well defined notation that is directly mapped to key concepts of ANT, highlighting the process of translating actors to commit to the implementation initiative. The approach is illustrated by an actor-network analysis of a particular IS-initiative in a Swedish media house.

  • 2. Bengtsson, Fredrik
    et al.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.
    Sjöström, Sofie
    Hrastinski, Stefan
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Ozan, Håkan
    Sustainability impact of open innovation software2012In: Proceedings of the XXIII ISPIM Conference  Action for Innovation: Innovating from Experience, Barcelona, Spain, 17-20 June 2012., 2012Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 3. Dahl, Michael
    et al.
    Lundmark, Torbjörn
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.
    Monstad, Therese
    Aligning IT to Business Goals: Holistic IT-Governance and Strategy Implementation2010In: Proceedings of the 33rd IRIS Seminar / [ed] Hanne Westh Nicolajsen, John Persson, Lise Heeager, Gitte Tjørnehøj, Karlheinz Kautz, Peter Axel Nielsen, 2010Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 4.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.
    A Goal-Oriented Dynamical Computation of Preference of Strategy2011In: First International Workshop on the Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation (TAFA-11) 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (in press), 2011Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 5.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Book Reviews2009In: Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic, ISSN 0039-3215, E-ISSN 1572-8730, Vol. 93, no 1, p. 97-103Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 6.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Aceto, Giacomo
    Hamfeldt, Andreas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    A Dynamic Metalogic Argumentation Framework Implementation2011In: Rule-Based Reasoning, Programming, and Applications: 5th International Symposium, RuleML 2011 – Europe, Barcelona, Spain, July 19-21, 2011. Proceedings / [ed] Nick Bassiliades, Guido Governatori, Adrian Paschke, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2011, p. 83-98Conference paper (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    One of the main challenges that faces the AI-community is to express close approximations of human reasoning as computational formalizations of argument. In this paper we present a full implementation and accompanying software for defeasible adversarial argumentation. The work is based on the metalogic framework of defeasible adversarial argumentation games of [9]. The software we developed consists of: a meta-interpreter, a declarative implementation of the argumentation game model and a graphical interface developed in Java that shows the results of the game execution and the construction of the argumentation derivation tree.

  • 7.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.
    Aceto, Giacomo
    Faculty of Engineering, University of Bologna, Italy.
    Hamfelt, Andreas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Towards a dynamic metalogic implementation of legal argumentation2011In: The proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, June 3-10, 2011., 2011, p. 91-95Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Human argumentation in general and legal dispute in particular can be seen as highly dynamic and non-monotonic to its nature. To us this suggests that logical analysis of legal argumentation needs to be conducted in a dynamical and flexible setting in which the interaction is influenced by the parties' previous arguments. To express such approximations of legal reasoning as computational formalizations of argument, applications require dealing with knowledge representations, non-monotonic logics and a game-model able to capture the interaction as a debate between two or more disputing parties. In this paper we present some intuitions regarding the features of a full implementation and accompanying software for defeasible adversarial legal argumentation.

  • 8.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.
    Bengtsson, Fredrik
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Edenius, Mats
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Cedernaes, Christopher
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Eriksson, Kristoffer
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Featuring Sustainability - social sustainability impact of Open Innovation Software2012In: The proceedings of the 5th ISPIM Innovation Symposium: Stimulation nnovation: Challenges for Management, Science & Technology, 2012Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 9.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.
    Edenius, Mats
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Anchoring Tablets in Organizational Practices - a Practice Based Approach to the Digitalization of Board Work2014In: The Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Auckland, New Zealand, December 14-17, 2014., 2014Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 10.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.
    Edenius, Mats
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    On Sustaining Sustainability—The Case of Implementing Decision s Based on Policies for a Sustainable Future viaTablets in a Board of a Swedish Housing Corporation2015In: Information, Models, and Sustainability: Policy Informatics in the Age of Big Data and Open Government / [ed] Jing Zhang,Luis F Luna, Theresa Pardo, Djoko Sigit Sayogo, Springer, 2015Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 11.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Data- och systemvetenskap.
    Governatori, Guido
    Thakur, Subhasis
    Padmanabhan, Vineet
    An Asymmetric Protocol for Argumentation Games in Defeasible Logic2007In: Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems: 10th Pacific Rim International Workshop on Multi-Agents, PRIMA 2007, Bangkok, Thailand, November 21+23, 2007, Proceedings, 2007Conference paper (Other (popular scientific, debate etc.))
  • 12.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Data- och systemvetenskap.
    Hamfelt, Andreas
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Data- och systemvetenskap.
    Towards Using Metalevel Stratification for Coordinating Agent Strategies.2007In: Metareasoning in Agent-Based Systems: First International Workshop on Metareasoning in Agent-Based Systems - In conjunction with the Sixth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2007), 2007Conference paper (Other (popular scientific, debate etc.))
  • 13.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.
    Hamfelt, Andreas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science.
    Fischer Nilsson, Jorgen
    Argumentation as a metacognitive skill of passing acceptance: a case study from a scientific dispute2005In: Metacognition in computation : papers from the 2005 AAAI symposium. Technical Report SS-05-04 / [ed] Mike Anderson and Tim Oates, Cochairs, Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press, 2005, p. 74-79Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Automated decision-making is a significant concern for theAI community and especially for multi-agent systems. Although it has long been known among scholars of rhetoric that human decision-making can be systematically influenced by skillful argumentation, there seems to be a lack of formalizations which handle the impact rhetoric has on the concealment of logical fallacies to the human mind. In this paper, we highlight the need of metacognition for the successful formal representation and interpretation of human argumentation and thus successful automated decision-making. The relevance of such investigations is illustrated with a real-world example taken from the discourse of neuroscience.

  • 14.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Data- och systemvetenskap.
    Hamfelt, Andreas
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Data- och systemvetenskap.
    Fischer Nilsson, Jörgen
    A rule-sceptic characterization of acceptable legal arguments2007In: ICAIL: The Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2007, p. 283-284Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 15.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Data- och systemvetenskap.
    Karlsson, Stefan
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Människa-datorinteraktion.
    Approaching artificial intelligence for games2005In: Proceedings of E-CAP´05, The Third European Computing and Philosophy Conference, 2005Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 16.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Data- och systemvetenskap.
    Karlsson, Stefan
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Människa-datorinteraktion.
    Approaching artificial intelligence for games - the Turing Test revisited2006In: Triple CArticle in journal (Refereed)
  • 17.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny S. Z.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science.
    On the Formal Modeling of Games of Language and Adversarial Argumentation: A Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence Approach2009Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Argumentation is a highly dynamical and dialectical process drawing on human cognition. Successful argumentation is ubiquitous to human interaction. Comprehensive formal modeling and analysis of argumentation presupposes a dynamical approach to the following phenomena: the deductive logic notion, the dialectical notion and the cognitive notion of justified belief. For each step of an argumentation these phenomena form networks of rules which determine the propositions to be allowed to make sense as admissible, acceptable, and accepted.

    We present a formal logic framework for a computational account of formal modeling and systematical analysis of the dynamical, exhaustive and dialectical aspects of adversarial argumentation and dispute. Our approach addresses the mechanisms of admissibility, acceptability and acceptance of arguments in adversarial argumentation by use of metalogic representation and Artificial Intelligence-techniques for dynamical problem solving by exhaustive search.

    We elaborate on a common framework of board games and argumentation games for pursuing the alternatives facing the adversaries in the argumentation process conceived as a game. The analogy to chess is beneficial as it incorporates strategic and tactical operations just as argumentation. Drawing on an analogy to board games like chess, the state space representation, well researched in Artificial Intelligence, allows for a treatment of all possible arguments as paths in a directed state space graph. It will render a game leading to the most wins and fewest losses, identifying the most effective game strategy. As an alternate visualization, the traversal of the state space graph unravels and collates knowledge about the given situation/case under dispute. Including the private knowledge of the two parties, the traversal results in an increased knowledge of the case and the perspectives and arguments of the participants.

    As we adopt metalogic as formal basis, arguments used in the argumentation, expressed in a non-monotonic defeasible logic, are encoded as terms in the logical argumentation analysis system. The advantage of a logical formalization of argumentation is that it provides a symbolic knowledge representation with a formally well-formed semantics, making the represented knowledge as well as the behavior of knowledge representation systems reasoning comprehensible. Computational logic as represented in Horn Clauses allows for expression of substantive propositions in a logical structure. The non-monotonic nature of defeasible logic stresses the representational issues, i.e. what is possible to capture in non-monotonic reasoning, while from the (meta)logic program, the sound computation on what it is possible to compute, and how to regard the semantics of this computation, are established.

  • 18.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.
    Wiberg, MikaelUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.Hrastinski, StefanUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.Edenius, MatsUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.Ågerfalk, Pär J.Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Managing Open Innovation Technologies2012Collection (editor) (Refereed)
  • 19.
    Hamfelt, Andreas
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Data- och systemvetenskap.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.
    Fischer Nilsson, Jorgen
    A Metalogical Formalization of Legal Argumentation as Game Trees with Defeasible Reasoning2005In: International conference on artificial intelligence and law (10th : 2005 Jun : Bologna, Italy), New York: ACM Press, 2005Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 20. Keller, Christina
    et al.
    Wiberg, MikaelUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.Ågerfalk, Par J.Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.Eriksson Lundström, Jenny S. Z.Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Nordic Contributions in IS Research: Third Scandinavian Conference on Information Systems, SCIS 2012, Sigtuna, Sweden, August 2012, Proceedings2012Conference proceedings (editor) (Refereed)
  • 21.
    Lucardie, Larry
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Data- och systemvetenskap.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Data- och systemvetenskap. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.
    Ezitis, Jonas
    Design Principles for Table-based Knowledge Bases: A Case Study From the Financial Sector2004In: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Knowledge Management ECKM / [ed] Dan Remenyi, 2004, p. 491-503Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 22.
    Mustafa, Mudassir Imran
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Psychosocial oncology and supportive care.
    Sjöström, Jonas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Psychosocial oncology and supportive care.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.
    An Empirical Account of Fitness-Utility: A Case of Radical Change towards Mobility in DSR Practice2014In: Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice: 9th International Conference, DESRIST 2014, Miami, FL, USA, May 22-24, 2014. Proceedings / [ed] Monica Chiarini Tremblay, Debra VanderMeer, Marcus Rothenberger, Ashish Gupta, Victoria Yoon, Springer International Publishing , 2014, p. 289-303Chapter in book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Evaluation is an essential part of design science research - a means to demonstrate qualities of artefacts and knowledge abstractions. The utilityfitness model suggests that evaluation needs to move from ‘usefulness’ measures to utility functions that incorporate the long-term evolution and survival of an artefact in its design landscape. In this paper, we interpret a process of innovative change taking place within a design system, in order to provide an empirical account of utility-fitness. We propose that the utility-fitness model pays too little explicit attention to technological-ecological fit, accountability, and robustness: Three ideals that were prevalent in the scrutinized empirical setting.

  • 23.
    Sjaunja, Knut
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Hrastinski, Stefan
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
    Towards creative open innovation software as facilitators of successful mass customization2011Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 24. Thakur, Subhasis
    et al.
    Governatori, Guido
    Padmanabhan, Vineet
    Eriksson Lundström, Jenny
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Information Science. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Information Systems.
    Dialogue games in defeasible logic2007In: AI 2007: Advances in Artificial Intelligence: 20th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Gold Coast, Australia, December 2-6, 2007. Proceedings / [ed] Mehmet A. Orgun, John Thornton, Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2007, p. 497-506Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In this paper we show how to capture dialogue games in Defeasible Logic. We argue that Defeasible Logic is a natural candidate and general representation formalism to capture dialogue games even with requirements more complex than existing formalisms for this kind of games. We parse the dialogue into defeasible rules with time of the dialogue as time of the rule. As the dialogue evolves we allow an agent to upgrade the strength of unchallenged rules. The proof procedures of [1] are used to determine the winner of a dialogue game.

1 - 24 of 24
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf