uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 45 of 45
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the 'Create feeds' function.
  • 1.
    Ekendahl, Karl
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Dead and Gone? Reply to Jenkins2014In: Utilitas, ISSN 0953-8208, E-ISSN 1741-6183, Vol. 26, no 02, 218-220 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 2.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    20th Century Theories of Personal Identity2015In: Philosophy of Mind in the Twentieth and Twenty-first Centuries / [ed] Amy Kind, Routledge, 2015Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 3.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Actual and Counterfactual Attitudes: Reply to Brueckner and Fischer2014In: Journal of Ethics, ISSN 1382-4554, E-ISSN 1572-8609, Vol. 18, 11-18 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In a recent article, I criticized Anthony L. Brueckner and John Martin Fischer’s influential argument—appealing to the rationality of our asymmetric attitudes towards past and future pleasures—against the Lucretian claim that death and prenatal non-existence are relevantly similar. Brueckner and Fischer have replied, however, that my critique involves an unjustified shift in temporal perspectives. In this paper, I respond to this charge and also argue that even if it were correct, it would fail to defend Brueckner and Fischer’s proposal against my critique.

  • 4.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Am I a Series2009In: Theoria, ISSN 0040-5817, E-ISSN 1558-5816Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 5.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Animal Ethics2016In: Animalism: New Essays on Persons, Animals, and Identity / [ed] Stephan Blatti and Paul Snowdon, Oxford University Press, 2016Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 6.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Asymmetry and Incoherence: A Reply to Cyr2016In: Journal of Ethics, ISSN 1382-4554, E-ISSN 1572-8609Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 7.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Being and Betterness2010In: Utilitas, ISSN 0953-8208, E-ISSN 1741-6183, 285-302 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 8.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Constituted Simples?2009In: Philosophia (Ramat Gan), ISSN 0048-3893, E-ISSN 1574-9274, Vol. 37, no 1, 87-89 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 9.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Death: Badness and Prudential Reasons2016In: Blackwell Companion to Applied Philosophy / [ed] K. Brownlee, D. Coady, K. Lippert-Rasmussen, Blackwell Publishing, 2016Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 10.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Fitting Attitudes, Welfare, and Time2009In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, ISSN 1386-2820, E-ISSN 1572-8447, 247-256 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 11.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Francescotti on Fission2009In: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, ISSN 0279-0750, E-ISSN 1468-0114Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 12.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Kaufman's Response to Lucretius2008In: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, ISSN 0279-0750, E-ISSN 1468-0114, Vol. 89, no 4, 470-485 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 13.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    More on the Mirror: Reply to Fischer and Brueckner2014In: Journal of Ethics, ISSN 1382-4554, E-ISSN 1572-8609, Vol. 18, no 4, 341-351 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    John Martin Fischer and Anthony L. Brueckner have argued that a person’s death is, in many cases, bad for him, whereas a person’s prenatal non-existence is not bad for him. Their suggestion relies on the idea that death deprives the person of pleasant experiences that it is rational for him to care about, whereas prenatal non-existence only deprives him of pleasant experiences that it is not rational for him to care about. In two recent articles in The Journal of Ethics, I have objected that it is irrelevant what it is in fact rational for the person to care about. Fischer and Brueckner have replied to my critique. In this paper I respond to their latest pair of replies.

  • 14.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Nagels argument för asymmetri2002In: Filosofisk Tidskrift, ISSN 0348-7482Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 15.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Non-Reductionism and Special Concern2007In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy, ISSN 0004-8402, E-ISSN 1471-6828, Vol. 85, no 4, 641-657 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 16.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    On Settling, by Robert E. Goodin: Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2012, pp. viii + 1142014In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy, ISSN 0004-8402, E-ISSN 1471-6828, Vol. 92, no 1, 192-194 p.Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 17.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Parfit on Fission2010In: Philosophical Studies, ISSN 0031-8116, E-ISSN 1573-0883, Vol. 150, no 1, 21-35 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 18.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Past and Future Non-Existence2012In: Journal of Ethics, ISSN 1382-4554, E-ISSN 1572-8609, Vol. 17, 51-64 p.Article, book review (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    According to the “deprivation approach,” a person’s death is bad for her to the extent that it deprives her of goods. This approach faces the Lucretian problem that prenatal non-existence deprives us of goods just as much as death does, but does not seem bad at all. The two most prominent responses to this challenge—one of which is provided by Frederik Kaufman (inspired by Thomas Nagel) and the other by Anthony Brueckner and John Martin Fischer—claim that prenatal non-existence is relevantly different from death. This paper criticizes these responses.

  • 19.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Recension av 8 filosofiska texter (red. Dan Munter & Kristian Löfgren)2008In: Filosofisk tidskriftArticle, book review (Other academic)
  • 20.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Recension av Lennart Lundmark, Kort om döden2014In: Filosofisk Tidskrift, ISSN 0348-7482, no 1Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 21.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Recension av Åsa Nordén, Har nutida fysik religiös betydelse?2001In: Filosofisk Tidskrift, ISSN 0348-7482Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 22.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Recension av Carl Reinhold Bråkenhielm, Verklighetsbilder2012In: Filosofisk Tidskrift, ISSN 0348-7482, Vol. 1Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 23.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Recension av Rainer Carls, Om tro och vetande, Johan Lundborg, När ateismen erövrade Sverige, Sebastian Rehnman, Gud, kunskap och vara2003In: Filosofisk Tidskrift, ISSN 0348-7482Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 24.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Recension av Thomas Hylland Eriksen & Dag O. Hessen, Egoism2002In: Filosofisk Tidskrift, ISSN 0348-7482Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 25.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Recension av Torbjörn Tännsjö, Konservatism2002In: Filosofisk Tidskrift, ISSN 0348-7482Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 26.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Recension av Ulf Jonsson, Med tanke på Gud2005In: Filosofisk Tidskrift, ISSN 0348-7482Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 27.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Review of Christopher Belshaw, Annihilation and Steven Luper, The Philosophy of Death2012In: Mind (Print), ISSN 0026-4423, E-ISSN 1460-2113, Vol. 121, no 481, 161-164 p.Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 28.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Review of Lynne Rudder Baker, The Metaphysics of Everyday Life2009In: Philosophical quarterly (Print), ISSN 0031-8094, E-ISSN 1467-9213Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 29.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Review of Nils Holtug, Persons, Interests, and Justice2011In: Theoria, ISSN 0040-5817, E-ISSN 1558-5816, TheoriArticle, book review (Other academic)
  • 30.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Roache's Argument against the Cohabitation View2011In: Philosophia (Ramat Gan), ISSN 0048-3893, E-ISSN 1574-9274, Vol. 39, no 2, 309-310 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Rebecca Roache's recent critique of David Lewis's "cohabitation" view assumes that a person cannot be properly concerned about something that rules out that she ever exists. In this brief response, I argue against this assumption.

  • 31.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    The Benefits and Harms of Existence and Non-Existence: Guest Editor's Introduction2012In: Journal of Ethics, ISSN 1382-4554, E-ISSN 1572-8609, Vol. 17, 1-4 p.Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 32.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    The Importance of a Good Ending: Some Reflections on Samuel Scheffler's Death and the Afterlife2015In: Journal of Ethics, ISSN 1382-4554, E-ISSN 1572-8609, Vol. 19, no 2, 185-195 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In his recent book, Death and the Afterlife, Samuel Scheffler argues that it matters greatly to us that there be other human beings long after our own deaths. In support of this “Afterlife Thesis,” as I call it, he provides a thought experiment—the “doomsday scenario”—in which we learn that, although we ourselves will live a normal life span, 30 days after our death the earth will be completely destroyed. In this paper I question this “doomsday scenario” support for Scheffler’s Afterlife Thesis. In particular, I suggest that Scheffler has underestimated the importance of a good ending.

  • 33.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    The Severity of Death2016In: End of Life Ethics / [ed] John Davis, Routledge, 2016Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 34.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    The Time of Death's Badness2012In: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, ISSN 0360-5310, E-ISSN 1744-5019, Vol. 37, no 5, 464-479 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Those who endorse the view that death is in some cases bad for the deceaseda view that, as I shall explain, has considerable bearing on many bioethical issuesneed to address the following, Epicurean question: When is death bad for the one who dies? The two most popular answers are before death (priorism) and after death (subsequentism). Part of the support for these two views consists in the idea that a third answer, at notime (atemporalism), makes death unsatisfyingly different from other evils. I argue that this objection is mistaken, and that priorism and subsequentism face problems that atemporalism avoids. Moreover, I argue that if it is nonetheless insisted that we must find a time at which mydeath is bad for me, we can appeal to periods that begin before my death and end after my death. I end with some implications for posthumous harm.

  • 35.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    The Timing Problem2012In: Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Death / [ed] Ben Bradley, Fred Feldman, Jens Johansson, New York: Oxford University Press, 2012Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 36.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Tiden och den dödeArticle in journal (Other academic)
  • 37.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    What is Animalism?2007In: Ratio (Oxford. Print), ISSN 0034-0006, E-ISSN 1467-9329, Vol. 20, no 2, 194-205 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 38.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    When Do We Incur Mortal Harm?2014In: Cambridge Companion to Life and Death / [ed] Steven Luper, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 39.
    Johansson, Jens
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Är det dåligt att dö?2002In: Unga filosofer: antologi för gymnasiet / [ed] O. Franck, Stockholm: Natur och kultur, 2002Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 40.
    Johansson, Jens
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Bradley, BenFeldman, Fred
    The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Death2013Collection (editor) (Refereed)
  • 41.
    Johansson, Jens
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Ekendahl, Karl
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy.
    Epicureanism, Extrinsic Badness, and Prudence2015In: Immortality and the Philosophy of Death / [ed] Michael Cholbi, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2015Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 42.
    Johansson, Jens
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Johannesson, Mikael
    Att granska sig själv: en ESO-rapport om den kommunala miljötillsynen2000Report (Other academic)
  • 43.
    Johansson, Jens
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Olson, Jonas
    Against Pluralism in Metaethics2015In: Palgrave Handbook on Philosophical Methods / [ed] Christopher Daly, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 44.
    Johansson, Jens
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Rosenqvist, Simon
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    "Pure Time Preference": Reply to Lowry and Peterson2016In: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, ISSN 0279-0750, E-ISSN 1468-0114, Vol. 97, no 3, 435-441 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    A pure time preference is a preference for something to occur at one point in time rather than another, merely because of when it occurs in time. Such preferences are widely regarded as paradigm examples of irrational preferences. However, Rosemary Lowry and Martin Peterson have recently argued that, for instance, a pure time preference to go to the opera tonight rather than next month may be rationally permissible, even if the amounts of intrinsic value realized in both cases are identical. In this reply, we argue that Lowry and Peterson's argument is unsuccessful.

  • 45.
    Johansson, Jens
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
    Svensson, Frans
    Objections to Virtue Ethics2016In: Oxford Handbook of Virtue / [ed] Nancy Snow, Oxford University Press, 2016Chapter in book (Refereed)
1 - 45 of 45
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf