Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 8 of 8
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Björkvik, Emma
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Blyth, Samuel
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Blicharska, Malgorzata
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Danley, Brian
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Rönnbäck, Patrik
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Informing obligations: Best practice information for catch‐and‐release in Swedish local recreational fisheries management2023In: Fisheries Management and Ecology, ISSN 0969-997X, E-ISSN 1365-2400, Vol. 30, no 3, p. 310-322Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Catch-and-release (C&R) is a popular management tool that can support sustainable development of recreational fisheries, if anglers adopt scientifically informed “best practices.” However, although the role of best practices is widely established in the academic literature, this knowledge is not always disseminated to anglers. In this paper, we investigated if and to what extent local management organizations provided best practice information to anglers. Based on a sample of 331 Swedish organizations, we reviewed the websites through which these organizations sold fishing licenses. Our review demonstrated widespread use of C&R as a management tool yet a general lack of best practice information. Among the small fraction of organizations that mentioned best practices, most mentioned only a single practice, with little consistency among practices that received attention. In addition, best practice information was particularly lacking for pike (Esox Lucius) and perch (Perca fluviatilis), which are by far the most landed and released species nationally. We discovered major knowledge deficiencies that provide insights about where and how to focus efforts for improving best practice information, in the context of local recreational fisheries management.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 2.
    Blyth, Samuel
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Casting for Knowledge and Landing Understanding: Exploring the management of Swedish recreational fisheries as social-ecological systems2024Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The successful management of recreational fisheries must balance ecological, and social goals; select from and implement a range of management tools; operate under often complex governance structures; and contend with diverse human stakeholders’ expectations, desires, and actual behaviour in response to management activities. This complexity also means that there are many knowledge and research gaps regarding the information needed to meet the requirements of specific fisheries. This thesis explores Swedish recreational fisheries as social-ecological systems to help close these gaps, and improve their future management.

    The sea trout (Salmo trutta) fishery around the island of Gotland provides context for investigating the human and ecological dimensions of catch-and-release (C&R), and stock level connections between angler expectations, catches, and spawning returns. This case study first identifies key motivations to retain or release sea trout of legal size, and factors anglers think are important for successful C&R. Then determines which angler-related, fish-related, or environmental factors impact stress levels and injuries for sea trout. Further, it identifies the potential for small changes in anglers harvest preferences to significantly impact mortality rates for an important segment of the spawning population. Taken together these outcomes identify knowledge and behavioural gaps that influence the successful application of C&R in this fishery, and that could affect the achievement of fishery management goals.

    Several opportunities to improve the transfer of information between stakeholder groups in Swedish recreational fisheries are illuminated through an assessment of how best practices for C&R are communicated to anglers, and an evaluation of potential biases generated when collecting data through angler surveys. Communication from freshwater fishery managers to fishing license buyers is deficient in the quality and quantity of information on best practices for C&R. In addition, this is notably poorer for certain fisheries and target species that have very high rates of C&R. In the opposite direction, the collection of information from anglers is also challenging, as common sampling techniques and the grouping of survey responses in recreational fisheries can introduce significant biases that impact how data can be interpreted. These include psychological dimensions of fishing experiences that connect angler motivations and behaviours to fishery management structures.

    This thesis contributes to the knowledge and discussion about sustainably managing recreational fisheries, but the methods to apply this information to existing governance structures and induce positive behavioural change in diverse populations of anglers require further development.

    List of papers
    1. To eat or not to eat, coastal sea trout anglers' motivations and perceptions of best practices for catch and release
    Open this publication in new window or tab >>To eat or not to eat, coastal sea trout anglers' motivations and perceptions of best practices for catch and release
    2022 (English)In: Fisheries Research, ISSN 0165-7836, E-ISSN 1872-6763, Vol. 254, article id 106412Article in journal (Refereed) Published
    Abstract [en]

    The wide variety of perspectives and actions of individual anglers contribute greatly to success or failure when adopting and implementing fisheries management tools. Catch-and-release (C&R) is one such tool where success is influenced by both variation in human factors, but also species and fishery specific characteristics. In this study, an intercept survey of 94 sea trout anglers in a C&R dominated fishery on the Swedish island of Gotland investigated motivations to release or retain catches, self-assessment of anglers' own ability to release fish, and their rating of the importance of various factors influencing the successful outcomes of C&R. Retention of catches was most strongly motivated by situations where anglers deemed the fish unlikely to survive, however more than half of anglers acknowledged being unaware of delayed mortality in released fish. The spawning status of an individual fish was the primary motivation for release, particularly among anglers that prefer to keep at least some of their catches. The roles of water temperature, using single, and barbless hooks were scored as significantly less important than other components contributing to the success of a release. Anglers that gave a favourable rating to their ability to release sea trout also gave greater importance to various factors influencing the success of release, reported higher catch per unit effort, and released a greater proportion of their catches. These findings are discussed in the context of bridging knowledge and behavioural gaps around best practices for C&R in this fishery.

    Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
    Elsevier, 2022
    Keywords
    Catch-and-release, Recreational fisheries, Salmo trutta, Human dimensions, Angling
    National Category
    Ecology Fish and Wildlife Management
    Identifiers
    urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-487109 (URN)10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106412 (DOI)000861667900005 ()
    Funder
    Swedish Research Council Formas, 2016-00227
    Available from: 2022-10-25 Created: 2022-10-25 Last updated: 2024-01-12Bibliographically approved
    2. After the spawn and on the hook: Sea trout Salmo trutta biophysical responses to different components of catch and release in a coastal fishery
    Open this publication in new window or tab >>After the spawn and on the hook: Sea trout Salmo trutta biophysical responses to different components of catch and release in a coastal fishery
    2022 (English)In: Journal of Fish Biology, ISSN 0022-1112, E-ISSN 1095-8649, Vol. 101, no 3, p. 464-477Article in journal (Refereed) Published
    Abstract [en]

    This study investigated the biophysical responses of sea run brown trout Salmo trutta to catch-and-release in the coastal fishery around Gotland, Sweden. It used information recorded on individual angled S. trutta (n = 162), including fight time, handling time, total air exposure time, injury, bleeding, fish length, body condition, spawning status, water temperature, hook location and difficulty of hook removal. Reflex action mortality predictors (equilibrium, operculum beats, tail grab response, body flex response and vestibular-ocular response), tests of blood glucose and lactate, and observation of hooking injury were used to measure the relative impact of the angling event on the fish's physical state and stress experienced. The results of this study suggest low rates of post-release mortality and generally limited stress responses to angling events, and relatively high post-release survival supported by the recapture of many tagged S. trutta. However, a number of scenarios were identified in which stress responses are likely to be compounded and where anglers should take additional action to reduce sublethal physiological disturbances and the risk of delayed mortality. Particular care should be taken to limit cumulative total air exposure to <10 s, and to reduce handling time and risk of additional injury in angling events with extended fight times, when water temperatures >10 degrees C, or where S. trutta show evidence of being physically compromised by injury or having recently spawned. The results also indicate the importance of using appropriately sized single hooks rather than larger treble hooks to reduce hooking injury and handling time during unhooking.

    Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
    John Wiley & Sons, 2022
    Keywords
    angler behaviour, angling, catch-and-release, fish impairment, recreational fisheries, stakeholder collaboration
    National Category
    Fish and Aquacultural Science Ecology
    Identifiers
    urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-493284 (URN)10.1111/jfb.15108 (DOI)000816845500001 ()35598067 (PubMedID)
    Available from: 2023-01-17 Created: 2023-01-17 Last updated: 2024-01-12Bibliographically approved
    3. Imagination, reality, and reproduction: Comparing the expectations of coastal sea trout anglers with real catches, and sea trout spawning activity
    Open this publication in new window or tab >>Imagination, reality, and reproduction: Comparing the expectations of coastal sea trout anglers with real catches, and sea trout spawning activity
    (English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
    National Category
    Environmental Sciences
    Identifiers
    urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-520541 (URN)
    Available from: 2024-01-12 Created: 2024-01-12 Last updated: 2024-01-12
    4. Informing obligations: Best practice information for catch‐and‐release in Swedish local recreational fisheries management
    Open this publication in new window or tab >>Informing obligations: Best practice information for catch‐and‐release in Swedish local recreational fisheries management
    Show others...
    2023 (English)In: Fisheries Management and Ecology, ISSN 0969-997X, E-ISSN 1365-2400, Vol. 30, no 3, p. 310-322Article in journal (Refereed) Published
    Abstract [en]

    Catch-and-release (C&R) is a popular management tool that can support sustainable development of recreational fisheries, if anglers adopt scientifically informed “best practices.” However, although the role of best practices is widely established in the academic literature, this knowledge is not always disseminated to anglers. In this paper, we investigated if and to what extent local management organizations provided best practice information to anglers. Based on a sample of 331 Swedish organizations, we reviewed the websites through which these organizations sold fishing licenses. Our review demonstrated widespread use of C&R as a management tool yet a general lack of best practice information. Among the small fraction of organizations that mentioned best practices, most mentioned only a single practice, with little consistency among practices that received attention. In addition, best practice information was particularly lacking for pike (Esox Lucius) and perch (Perca fluviatilis), which are by far the most landed and released species nationally. We discovered major knowledge deficiencies that provide insights about where and how to focus efforts for improving best practice information, in the context of local recreational fisheries management.

    Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
    John Wiley & Sons, 2023
    Keywords
    C&R science, hierarchical clustering, inland waters, institutional grammar, local management, mandatory C&R
    National Category
    Other Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
    Identifiers
    urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-507503 (URN)10.1111/fme.12622 (DOI)000961359800001 ()
    Funder
    Swedish Research Council Formas, 2016-00227Swedish Research Council, 2016-00227
    Available from: 2023-07-06 Created: 2023-07-06 Last updated: 2024-01-12Bibliographically approved
    5. Beyond asking the right questions: Accounting for biases in a recreational fishery survey
    Open this publication in new window or tab >>Beyond asking the right questions: Accounting for biases in a recreational fishery survey
    Show others...
    (English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
    Keywords
    selection bias, survey research, human dimensions, fishing motivation, fishing satisfaction, multispecies fishery
    National Category
    Environmental Sciences
    Identifiers
    urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-520533 (URN)
    Available from: 2024-01-12 Created: 2024-01-12 Last updated: 2024-01-12
    Download full text (pdf)
    UUThesis_Blyth,S-2024
    Download (jpg)
    presentationsbild
  • 3.
    Blyth, Samuel
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Bower, Shannon D.
    Infin Social & Ecol Solut, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
    After the spawn and on the hook: Sea trout Salmo trutta biophysical responses to different components of catch and release in a coastal fishery2022In: Journal of Fish Biology, ISSN 0022-1112, E-ISSN 1095-8649, Vol. 101, no 3, p. 464-477Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This study investigated the biophysical responses of sea run brown trout Salmo trutta to catch-and-release in the coastal fishery around Gotland, Sweden. It used information recorded on individual angled S. trutta (n = 162), including fight time, handling time, total air exposure time, injury, bleeding, fish length, body condition, spawning status, water temperature, hook location and difficulty of hook removal. Reflex action mortality predictors (equilibrium, operculum beats, tail grab response, body flex response and vestibular-ocular response), tests of blood glucose and lactate, and observation of hooking injury were used to measure the relative impact of the angling event on the fish's physical state and stress experienced. The results of this study suggest low rates of post-release mortality and generally limited stress responses to angling events, and relatively high post-release survival supported by the recapture of many tagged S. trutta. However, a number of scenarios were identified in which stress responses are likely to be compounded and where anglers should take additional action to reduce sublethal physiological disturbances and the risk of delayed mortality. Particular care should be taken to limit cumulative total air exposure to <10 s, and to reduce handling time and risk of additional injury in angling events with extended fight times, when water temperatures >10 degrees C, or where S. trutta show evidence of being physically compromised by injury or having recently spawned. The results also indicate the importance of using appropriately sized single hooks rather than larger treble hooks to reduce hooking injury and handling time during unhooking.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 4.
    Blyth, Samuel
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Rönnbäck, Patrik
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    To eat or not to eat, coastal sea trout anglers' motivations and perceptions of best practices for catch and release2022In: Fisheries Research, ISSN 0165-7836, E-ISSN 1872-6763, Vol. 254, article id 106412Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The wide variety of perspectives and actions of individual anglers contribute greatly to success or failure when adopting and implementing fisheries management tools. Catch-and-release (C&R) is one such tool where success is influenced by both variation in human factors, but also species and fishery specific characteristics. In this study, an intercept survey of 94 sea trout anglers in a C&R dominated fishery on the Swedish island of Gotland investigated motivations to release or retain catches, self-assessment of anglers' own ability to release fish, and their rating of the importance of various factors influencing the successful outcomes of C&R. Retention of catches was most strongly motivated by situations where anglers deemed the fish unlikely to survive, however more than half of anglers acknowledged being unaware of delayed mortality in released fish. The spawning status of an individual fish was the primary motivation for release, particularly among anglers that prefer to keep at least some of their catches. The roles of water temperature, using single, and barbless hooks were scored as significantly less important than other components contributing to the success of a release. Anglers that gave a favourable rating to their ability to release sea trout also gave greater importance to various factors influencing the success of release, reported higher catch per unit effort, and released a greater proportion of their catches. These findings are discussed in the context of bridging knowledge and behavioural gaps around best practices for C&R in this fishery.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 5.
    Blyth, Samuel
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Stensland, Stian
    Rönnbäck, Patrik
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Imagination, reality, and reproduction: Comparing the expectations of coastal sea trout anglers with real catches, and sea trout spawning activityManuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
  • 6.
    Blyth, Samuel
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    van den Heuvel, Lotte
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Blicharska, Malgorzata
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Bergström, Ulf
    Ovegård, Marie
    Rönnbäck, Patrik
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Sundblad, Göran
    Beyond asking the right questions: Accounting for biases in a recreational fishery surveyManuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
  • 7.
    Fennell, David A.
    et al.
    Department of Geography and Tourism Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada.
    Kline, Carol
    Hospitality &amp; Tourism Management, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA.
    Mkono, Mucha
    Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
    Grimwood, Bryan S. R.
    Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
    Sheppard, Valerie A.
    Justice Institute of British Columbia, New Westminster, BC, Canada.
    Dashper, Katherine
    School of Events, Tourism and Hospitality Management, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
    Rickly, Jillian
    Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
    Burns, Georgette Leah
    School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia.
    Bertella, Giovanna
    School of Business and Economics, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
    von Essen, Erica
    Stockholm Resilience Center, Stockholm, Sweden.
    García-Rosell, José-Carlos
    Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland.
    Guo, Yulei
    Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Research Department, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China.
    Hoarau-Heemstra, Hin
    Faculty of Social Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
    López López, Álvaro
    Instituto de Geografía, National Autonomous University of Mexico.
    Quintero Venegas, Gino Jafet
    Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Coyoacán, México.
    Holladay, Patrick J.
    Hospitality, Tourism &amp; Event Management, Troy University, USA.
    Cavaliere, Christina T.
    Cavaliere Tourism and Conservation Lab, Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Colorado State University, Colorado, USA;School of Tourism and Hospitality, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.
    Copeland, Kellen
    Lewis &amp; Clark College, Portland, OR, USA.
    Danley, Brian
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Bell Rizzolo, Jessica
    Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Sciences at Oregon State University, Oregon USA.
    Hurst, Chris E.
    Tourism and Hospitality, Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
    Usui, Rie
    College of Sustainability and Tourism, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University, Beppu, Japan.
    Äijälä, Mikko
    Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland.
    Crossley, Émilie
    Center for Advanced Tourism Studies (CATS), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
    Hill, Kristine
    University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
    Szydlowski, Michelle
    Anthrozoology as International Practice Working Group.
    Bisgrove, Daniel
    School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
    Blyth, Samuel
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Fennell, Samuel R.
    Department of Anthropology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
    Oxley Heaney, Sarah
    University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
    Schuhmacher, Caroline
    Oxford Brookes Business School, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
    Tully, Paul
    Department of Tourism, Otago Business School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
    Coose, Sarah
    Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
    Hooper, Jes
    Department of Anthrozoology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
    Madrid, Rebecca
    University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
    Tourism, animals & the vacant niche: a scoping review and pedagogical agenda2024In: Current Issues in Tourism, ISSN 1368-3500, E-ISSN 1747-7603, p. 1-29Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The topic of animal ethics has advanced in tourism studies since its inception in 2000, based on a diverse range of studies on species involvement, types of uses and contexts, level of engagement, states of animals, and theoretical perspectives. While there is still considerable scope to amplify research on animal-based tourism, a gap exists in tourism pedagogy amidst the field’s emphasis on a new expanding consciousness platform. We review the depth of existing scholarship on animal ethics in tourism and develop an agenda for advancing animal ethics pedagogy for the future. Our intent is to issue a call to action for curriculum committees, programme administrators, and educators to recognise and act on this critical moral domain in tourism education.

  • 8.
    van den Heuvel, Lotte
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development. Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Fac Sci, Inst Sci Soc, Heyendaalseweg 135, NL-6525 AJ Nijmegen, Netherlands.
    Blicharska, Malgorzata
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Blyth, Samuel
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Rönnbäck, Patrik
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development.
    Catch reporting in recreational fishing: Swedish anglers’ attitudes andpreferences, and the effect of social factors2020In: Fisheries Research, ISSN 0165-7836, E-ISSN 1872-6763, Vol. 223, article id 105444Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Recreational fishing activities have the potential to negatively affect fish populations worldwide, but data about fishing pressure is lacking in many countries. The Swedish government anticipates tackling this problem by implementing a national catch reporting program. Through an online survey among members of the Swedish Anglers Association (±60.000 members), this study gathers the attitudes and preferences of Swedish anglers (n=910) through a variety of statements relating to the potential introduction of a catch reporting program and investigates the effects of different social factors (consumptive orientation, motivations to fish, centrality to life and environmental attitude) on these attitudes and preferences. The results reveal that support for a potential catch reporting program was high for most anglers. Significant positive relationships were found between support for a catch reporting program and the sense of responsibility towards conservation issues, the desire to catch big fish and experiencing the environment as a motivation to fish. On the other hand, the desire to keep fish and catch large numbers of fish had a significant negative relationship with catch reporting support. Support for a mandatory catch reporting program increased with age, education level, income and years of fishing experience. Despite the generally positive attitude towards a potential catch reporting program, consumptive orientation, motivations to fish, environmental attitude and demographic characteristics were proven to play an important role in the anglers’ preferences towards catch reporting, and should not be overlooked when designing such a program. Our study shows that investigation of the social composition of an angler population is vital to obtain a better understanding of the diversity of attitudes and preferences towards recreational fisheries management, which can in turn facilitate implementation of management measures, such as catch reporting programs. Since this study focused only on members of the national angling association, who are likely more avid than non-members, additional research is needed to obtain results that are more representative of the total Swedish angler population.

1 - 8 of 8
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf