Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2017 (English)In: European Journal of Haematology, ISSN 0902-4441, E-ISSN 1600-0609, Vol. 99, no 2, p. 141-149Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
ObjectivesOlder/elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are poorly represented in clinical trials. MethodsUsing Swedish national leukemia registries, we investigated disease/patient characteristics, treatment choices, outcome, and the impact of an age-adapted protocol (introduced in 2009) in this population-based study of patients aged 55-85years, diagnosed with ALL 2005-2012. ResultsOf 174 patients, 82% had B-phenotype, 11% Burkitt leukemia (excluded), and 7% T-phenotype. Philadelphia chromosome positivity (Ph+) occurred in 35%. Of the 155 B- and T-ALL patients, 80% were treated with intensive protocols, and 20% with a palliative approach. Higher age and WHO performance status 2 influenced the choice of palliation. Intensive, palliative, and both approaches resulted in complete remission rate 83/16/70% and 3-year overall survival (OS) 32/3/26%. The age-adapted protocol did not improve outcome. With intensive treatment, platelet count 35x10(9)/L and age 75years were adverse prognostic factors for OS, Ph+ was not. Male sex was an adverse prognostic factor in the 55-64 year age-group. ConclusionsWe report a high frequency of Ph+ in older/elderly patients, with no evidence of poorer outcome compared to Ph-negative disease. Overall prognosis for elderly patients with ALL remains dismal, despite the use of age-adapted treatment.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY, 2017
Keywords
acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chemotherapy, elderly, epidemiology
National Category
Hematology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-329913 (URN)10.1111/ejh.12896 (DOI)000404936400005 ()
2017-10-202017-10-202020-01-15Bibliographically approved