Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

Cyclin D1 has a central role in cell cycle control and is an important component of estrogen regulation of cell cycle progression. We have previously shown that high cyclin D expression is related to aggressive features of ER-positive but not ER-negative breast cancer. The aims of the present study were to validate this differential ER-related effect and furthermore explore the relationship between cyclin D overexpression and CCND1 gene amplification status in a node-negative breast cancer case-control study. Immunohistochemical nuclear expression of cyclin D1 (n = 364) and amplification of the gene CCND1 by fluorescent in situ hybridization (n = 255) was performed on tissue microarray sections from patients with T1-2N0M0 breast cancer. Patients given adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. The primary event was defined as breast cancer death. Breast cancer-specific survival was analyzed in univariate and multivariable models using conditional logistic regression. Expression of cyclin D1 above the median (61.7%) in ER breast cancer was associated with an increased risk for breast cancer death (OR 3.2 95% CI 1.5-6.8) also when adjusted for tumor size and grade (OR 3.1). No significant prognostic impact of cyclin D1 expression was found among ER-negative cases. Cyclin D1 overexpression was significantly associated to high expression of the proliferation markers cyclins A (rho 0.19, p = 0.006) and B (rho 0.18, p = 0.003) in ER-positive tumors, but not in ER-negative cases. There was a significant association between CCND1 amplification and cyclin D1 expression (p = 0.003), but CCND1 amplification was not statistically significantly prognostic (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.4-4.4). We confirmed our previous observation that high cyclin D1 expression is associated to high proliferation and a threefold higher risk of death from breast cancer in ER-positive breast cancer.

Background: Up to 50% of patients with advanced small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) and carcinoid syndrome (CS) develop carcinoid heart disease (CHD). However, the true frequency and prognostic markers for CHD in CS are lacking. We described the real-world management of patients in two NET referral centers in this clinical context and relationships between clinical features, including CHD and overall survival (OS). Patients and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with stage IV SI-NET and CS, treated at the European Institute of Oncology in Milan and Uppsala University in Sweden between 2015 and 2021. CHD was defined as at least one moderate right-sided heart valve defect. Median OS and cumulative incidence of CHD were estimated from the diagnosis of metastatic disease, and the association between clinical parameters with both OS and occurrence of CHD was evaluated. Results: We included 165 patients, with 97% having low-intermediate-grade SI-NETs and 86% having synchronous liver metastases. Ninety-eight patients (59%) became refractory to full label dose of somatostatin analogues and 25% developed a CHD. At CHD diagnosis, baseline urine 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (24-h u5-HIAA) value and plasma Nterminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) value were known in 76% of patients. Moderate-to-severe tricuspid insufficiency was the most common alteration of CHD. Prognosis was significantly impaired by CHD (multivariable hazard ratio for OS = 2.85, P < 0.001). The median OS from the CHD diagnosis was 4.5 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-7.2 years], and the 5-year survival rate was 34% (95% CI 13% to 57%). Conclusions: In our study population of SI-NET patients with CS, more than half had a refractory carcinoid syndrome (RCS) and one-quarter developed a CHD, with a negative impact on OS. Therefore, it is recommended to screen and monitor patients with CS for CHD, ideally with a combination of u5-HIAA, NT-proBNP values, and echocardiography at CS baseline, preferably in NET referral centers.

The aim of this thesis was to investigate biological and clinical aspects of G3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (G3 GEP-NENs).

In our first study, the expression of the tumor suppressor p53 was investigated. In a cohort of G3 GEP-NENs we found the expression of p53 protein to be present in 39% of 124 cases. Expression of p53 correlated to poorer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with G3 GEP-NENs originating from colon or rectum. In the next study, we aimed to demonstrate the prevalence of PD-L1 expression in G3 GEP-NENs and its possible clinical importance. Ten per cent of 136 tumor specimens were immunoreactive for PD-L1 in either tumor cells or immune cells. In contrast to p53 expression that could be correlated to PFS and OS in a subgroup of patients the expression of PD-L1 did not correlate to any clinicopathological variables and conclusively, PD-L1 may not have a vital role for the pathogenesis of G3 GEP-NENs. In a further study, we sought to identify new potential biomarkers and a panel of immuno-oncological proteins were measured in serum collected from pancreatic G3 NENs and healthy controls. Out of 87 proteins, 62% were significantly lower in serum concentration in healthy controls compared to patients. One protein, FasL, was present in significantly higher levels in healthy controls compared to patients. FasL may have a protective role in its ability to activate T cells in the immune system. Other proteins of interest were chemokine (c-c motif) ligand and interleukin 8 that both correlated to poorer prognosis in G3 pancreatic NEN patients. More studies are needed for further understanding of the roles and clinical relevance of immuno-oncological proteins in G3 pancreatic NENs.

Finally, we evaluated whether intravenous or oral administration of etoposide differed with regards to PFS and OS in patients with G3 GEP-NENs. There was no significant difference in PFS nor OS between patients receiving oral compared to intravenous etoposide; demonstrating that an oral option of etoposide is not inferior in its efficacy as compared to the more used intravenous formulation. These results suggest that considering oral options of etoposide is important since they are more often preferred by patients, increase the quality of life for the patients and reduce hospital costs.

This thesis has contributed to an understanding of the distribution and clinical relevance of p53 and PD-L1 in GEP-NENs. A potential role of FasL, chemokine and interleukin 8 as prognostic and/or diagnostic factors in pancreatic G3 NENs has been identified and should be further investigated. The thesis also gave some insight into the role of oral etoposide as an alternative option to intravenous formulation with regards to efficacy. Oral formulations are preferred by many patients and improve quality of life while decreasing hospital-related costs. Further studies are needed to compare the tolerability of oral formulation compared to the intravenous formulation. 

Background Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NECs) are aggressive, rapidly proliferating tumors. Therapeutic response to current chemotherapy regimens is usually short lasting. The aim of this study was to examine the expression and potential clinical importance of immunoreactive p53 protein in GEP-NEC. Materials and methods Tumor tissues from 124 GEP-NEC patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were collected from Nordic centers and clinical data were obtained from the Nordic NEC register. Tumor proliferation rate and differentiation were re-evaluated. All specimens were immunostained for p53 protein using a commercially available monoclonal antibody. Kaplan-Meier curves and cox regression analyses were used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results All tumor tissues were immunoreactive for either one or both neuroendocrine biomarkers (chromogranin A and synaptophysin) and Ki67 index was >20% in all cases. p53 immunoreactivity was only shown in 39% of the cases and was not found to be a prognostic marker for the whole cohort. However, p53 immunoreactivity was correlated with shorter PFS in patients with colorectal tumors (HR = 2.1, p = 0.03) in a univariate analysis as well as to poorer PFS (HR = 2.6, p = 0.03) and OS (HR = 3.4, p = 0.02) in patients with colorectal tumors with distant metastases, a correlation which remained significant in the multivariate analyses. Conclusion In this cohort of GEP-NEC patients, p53 expression could not be correlated with clinical outcome. However, in patients with colorectal NECs, p53 expression was correlated with shorter PFS and OS. Further studies are needed to establish the role of immunoreactive p53 as a prognostic marker for GEP-NEC patients.

High-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs, G3) are aggressive cancers of the digestive system with poor prognosis and survival. Platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin/carboplatin + etoposide) is considered the first-line palliative treatment. Etoposide is frequently administered intravenously; however, oral etoposide may be used as an alternative. Concerns for oral etoposide include decreased bioavailability, inter-and intra-patient variability and patient compliance. We aimed to evaluate possible differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with oral etoposide compared to etoposide given as infusion. Patients (n = 236) from the Nordic NEC study were divided into three groups receiving etoposide as a long infusion (24 h, n = 170), short infusion (= 5 h, n = 33) or oral etoposide (n = 33) according to hospital tradition. PFS and OS were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier (log-rank), cox proportional hazard ratios and confidence intervals. No statistical differences were observed in PFS or OS when comparing patients receiving long infusion (median PFS 3.8 months, median OS 14.5 months), short infusion (PFS 5.6 months, OS 11.0 months) or oral etoposide (PFS 5.4 months, OS 11.3 months). We observed equal efficacy for the three administration routes suggesting oral etoposide may be safe and efficient in treating high-grade GEP-NEN, G3 patients scheduled for cisplatin/carboplatin + etoposide therapy.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms grade 3 (GEP-NENs G3) are rare tumors. These highly aggressive neoplasms are traditionally treated with platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with etoposide. Immune checkpoint proteins such as programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1) may have a role in different cancers allowing them escape the immune system and hence, progress. We aimed to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of PD-L1 in GEP-NEN G3 and evaluate its correlation to clinical parameters. In a cohort of 136 patients, 14 (10%) expressed PD-L1 immunoreactivity; four (3%) patients in the tumor cells and 10 (7%) had immunoreactive immune cells. PD-L1 expression did not correlate to clinical parameters, progression-free survival or overall survival. We conclude that PD-L1 expression is present only in a subset of GEP-NEN G3 patients. Further studies are needed to fully understand the role of PD-L1 in patients with GEP-NEN G3, including the future possibility for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are rare tumours that compose 1-2% of all pancreatic tumours. Patients with metastatic grade 3 neoplasia are usually treated with chemotherapy but have a poor progression-free and overall survival. According to the WHO 2017 classification, they are divided into neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) G3 and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Despite the new classification, new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers are needed to sub-categorise the patients and to help guide therapy decisions. Blood from 42 patients and 42 healthy controls were screened for the presence of 92 proteins with the Immuno-Oncology panel using the Proximity Extension Assay provided by Olink Biosciences. Immunohistochemical staining of FAS ligand (FASLG) was performed on 16 patient tumour specimens using a commercial antibody. Fifty-four out of 87 evaluable proteins differed significantly in concentration between blood from patients and blood from healthy controls. FASLG was the only protein for which the concentration in blood was significantly lower in patients compared to controls and the levels correlated negatively to Ki-67 index. Seven of 14 evaluable PanNEN G3 specimens showed FASLG immunoreactivity in the tumour cells while there was scattered immunoreactivity in immune cells. Positive FASLG immunoreactivity correlated to well-differentiated morphology. FASLG concentration in blood was significantly lower in patients with pancreatic NENs G3 compared to controls, and the expression in tumour tissue was variable. Furthermore, FASLG was negatively correlated to Ki-67 and was more frequently expressed in well-differentiated tumours. Taken together, these results may suggest a role of FASLG in PanNENs.

Lutetium peptide receptor radio nuclide therapy (Lu-PRRT) is an effective treatment for progressive, metastatic, somatostatin-receptor-positive, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (WD-NETs). Here, we report a single centre experience of real-world efficacy, long-term side effects, and challenges of this treatment. This was a retrospective analysis. All patients linked with our centre who had Lu-PRRT were included. Clinicopathological data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression. A total of 45 patients had Lu-PRRT, of those 30 (67%) were males, and 13 (29%) were more than 65 years old. The primary site was small intestine in 30 (67%) patients, pancreas in seven (16%) patients, and lung in three (7%) patients. The tumor was grade 1 in 15 (35%) patients, grade 2 in 22 (48%) patients, and grade 3 in six (13%) patients. A total of 41 (91%) patients had liver metastasis, and 20 (44%) patients had carcinoid syndrome. Lu-PRRT was the second-line therapy in all patients. Krenning's score was 4 in 36 (80%) patients and 3 in nine (20%) patients. The median waiting time to start Lu-PRRT therapy was 87 days. The median follow-up was 41 months. A total of 23 (51%) patients had a partial response, 18 (40%) patients had stable disease, and four (9%) patients had progression. None of the patients had a complete response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 38 months (95% CI: 25.8-50.1). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Nine patients died during follow-up (death from any cause). Prior treatment with targeted therapies or high dose somatostatin analogues were negative predictors of Lu-PRRT outcome (p-values of < .001 and < .045, respectively). There were two serious haematological toxicities, one patient developed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), and the other developed chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Lu-PRRT is an effective second-line treatment for metastatic WD-NETs. The effect of targeted therapies on Lu-PRRT outcome was significant and needs to be clarified in further studies.

Aim: Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide producing neuroendocrine tumors are rare and cause severe hormonal symptoms. Patients/methods: Eighteen patients with vasoactive intestinal polypeptide producing neuroendocrine tumors were analyzed with reviews of medical records, radiology and tumor tissue specimens. Results: Twelve patients (67%) had liver metastases at diagnosis. Chemotherapy, somatostatin analogs and interferon were given as medical therapies. Streptozocin/5-fluorouracil produced an objective response in 40% of the evaluable patients. Somatostatin analogs gave a clinical/biochemical response in eight out of nine patients. Transarterial embolization of the liver and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy was given to refractory cases. Sixteen patients died during the observation period. The median overall survival from diagnosis was 102 months. Conclusion: Systemic chemotherapy and somatostatin analogs should be given in cases of advanced disease or for hormonal symptoms.

BACKGROUND: In our center, the combination of streptozocin (STZ) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been used as the first-line treatment in the majority of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) over the past few decades. The objective of the current study was to assess the efficacy, prognostic factors and safety of the combination of STZ and 5-FU.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records and radiological reports of 133 patients with pNETs who received the combination of STZ and 5-FU during the period 1981-2014 were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS: Median survival from start of treatment was 51.9 months in the whole group. In the radiologically evaluable patients (n = 100) progression-free survival was 23 months. Complete response was reached in 3 patients (3%), partial response in 25 patients (25%), 64 patients (64%) had stable disease and 8 patients (8%) had progressive disease. In a multivariate analysis, surgery of the primary tumor and having a G3 tumor were significant positive and negative prognostic factors of survival from start of treatment, respectively. Having either a G3 tumor or stage IV tumor were significant prognostic factors for shorter progression-free survival. Chemotherapy had to be discontinued in 29 patients due to side-effects, of which kidney toxicity (mainly grade 1-2) was the most frequent.

CONCLUSION: As shown in recent reports, the combination of STZ and 5-FU is effective in the treatment of pNETs in terms of survival and radiological response, and has an acceptable toxicity profile.

Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a therapeutic challenge and evidence for late-line treatments in real-life is limited. The present study investigates the efficacy and safety of an oral metronomic chemo-hormonal regimen including cyclophosphamide, etoposide, estramustine, ketoconazole and prednisolone (KEES) administered in a consecutive biweekly schedule.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study in two Swedish regions was conducted. Overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), biochemical response rate (bRR) and toxicities were analyzed.

Results: One hundred and twenty-three patients treated with KEES after initial treatment with at least a taxane or an androgen-receptor targeting agents (ARTA) were identified. Of those, 95 (77%) had received both agents and were the primary analysis population. Median (95% CI) OS and PFS in the pre-treated population were 12.3 (10.1-15.0) and 4.4 (3.8-5.5) months, respectively. Biochemical response, defined as >= 50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction, occurred in 26 patients (29%), and any PSA reduction in 59 (65%). PFS was independent of prior treatments used, and KEES seemed to be effective in late treatment lines. The bRR was higher compared to historical data of metronomic treatments in docetaxel and ARTA pre-treated populations. In multivariable analyses, performance status (PS) >= 2 and increasing alkaline phosphatase (ALP) predicted for worse OS. Nausea, fatigue, thromboembolic events and bone marrow suppression were the predominant toxicities.

Conclusions: KEES demonstrated meaningful efficacy in heavily pre-treated CRPC patients, especially those with PS 0-1 and lower baseline ALP, and had an acceptable toxicity profile.