uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
Refine search result
12 1 - 50 of 71
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1. Back, Hanna
    et al.
    Meier, Henk Erik
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Fischer, Joern
    European Integration and Prime Ministerial Power: A Differential Impact on Cabinet Reshuffles in Germany and Sweden2012In: German Politics, ISSN 0964-4008, E-ISSN 1743-8993, Vol. 21, no 2, p. 184-208Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    It is commonly assumed that European integration empowers prime ministers at the expense of cabinet ministers and parliamentary actors. This article follows the suggestion that an increase in cabinet reshuffles indicates power shifts in favour of the PM, and studies reshuffles in two countries that have been involved very differently in the process of European integration, Germany and Sweden. It hypothesises that if European integration empowers the PM, the PM will employ cabinet reshuffles more often. By implication, as integration increases, (1) ministerial reshuffles should become more frequent, and (2) political insiders and ministers holding important portfolios should be more likely to be dismissed. The results found in an event history analysis show that EU integration leads to an increase of turnover when looking at Swedish post-war cabinets, whereas no such effect is found for German cabinets. These results are in line with the idea that a differential impact of Europe on intra-executive relations should be expected.

  • 2. Baeck, Hanna
    et al.
    Dumont, Patrick
    Meier, Henk Erik
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Vernby, Kåre
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Does European Integration Lead to a 'Presidentialization' of Executive Politics?: Ministerial Selection in Swedish Postwar Cabinets2009In: European Union Politics, ISSN 1465-1165, E-ISSN 1741-2757, Vol. 10, no 2, p. 226-252Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In this article, we address recent claims that executive legislative relations in parliamentary democracies are undergoing important changes owing to either a 'presidentialization' or a 'Europeanization' of domestic political systems. Therefore, we test empirically whether parliamentary democracies are indeed experiencing changes in executive-legislative relations and whether these developments can, in part, be explained by an increase in European integration. Using data on ministerial selection in Swedish cabinets during the years 1952-2006, we find that there appears to be a slight tendency towards 'presidentialization', which is indicated by a decrease in ministers with a parliamentary background being appointed, and that there exists some support for the notion that Sweden's political and economic integration into the European Union is part of the explanation for this change.

  • 3.
    Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Antonina
    et al.
    Stockholms universitet.
    Mårtensson, Moa
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Oxelheim, Lars
    Lunds universitet.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    The EU and Global Imbalances2015In: The EU’s Role in Fighting Global Imbalances / [ed] Bakrdjieva Engelbrekt, A., Mårtensson, M., Oxelheim, L. och Persson, T., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015, p. 1-15Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 4. Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Antonina
    et al.
    Mårtensson, MoaUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.Oxelheim, LarsPersson, ThomasUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    The EU's Role in Fighting Global Imbalances2015Collection (editor) (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The EU’s Role in Fighting Global Imbalances looks at the role of the European Union in addressing some of the greatest challenges of our time: poverty, protectionism, climate change, and human trafficking. Contributions from ten leading scholars in the fields of economics, law, and political science provide in-depth analyses of three key dimensions of EU foreign policy, namely: the internal challenges facing the EU, as its 28 member countries struggle to coordinate their actions; the external challenges facing the EU on the global arena, in areas where global imbalances are particularly pervasive, and where measures taken by the Union can have an important impact; and the EU´s performance on the global arena, in the eyes of other key actors. Based on a broad and interdisciplinary understanding of the concept of global imbalances, this book argues that these challenges follow from pervasive global imbalances, which at root are economic, political, and legal in character.

  • 5.
    Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Antonina
    et al.
    Stockholms universitet.
    Oxelheim, LarsLunds universitet.Persson, ThomasUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Arbetslöshet, migrationspolitik och nationalism: Hot mot EU:s sammanhållning?2012Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Årsboken 2012 behandlar dynamiken mellan arbetslöshet, migrationspolitik och nationalism som en avgörande framtidsfråga för EU.EU:s sammanhållning är satt på sitt hittills svåraste prov. I den ekonomiska krisens spår ser vissa medlemsländer arbetslösheten stiga dramatiskt och tvingas till kraftiga neddragningar i välfärden. I andra medlemsländer går krisen relativt obemärkt förbi. Otryggheten och skillnaderna på Europas arbetsmarknad utgör grogrund för nationalism och främlingsfientlighet. Krav hörs på en mer restriktiv migrationspolitik. Samtidigt står Europa, med sin åldrande befolkning, inför en allvarlig demografisk och välfärdspolitisk utmaning. Många hävdar därför att EU:s konkurrenskraft och tillväxt på sikt måste bygga på en kraftigt ökad arbetskraftsinvandring.Denna bok behandlar dynamiken mellan arbetslöshet, migrationspolitik och nationalism som en avgörande framtidsfråga för EU. Vilka konsekvenser har den stigande arbetslösheten och de växande nationalistiska strömningarna för ­migrationspolitiken i Europa? Klarar EU de motsättningar som följer när vissa medlemsländer trappar upp argumentationen för nationella särlösningar? Kommer den fria rörligheten och EU:s gemensamma arbetsmarknad att kunna upprätthållas? Räcker tilliten mellan EU-länderna för att enas om ett gemensamt regelverk kring arbetskraftsinvandringen, som på en gång tillvaratar migran­ternas rättigheter och löser unionens långsiktiga demografiska problem?

  • 6.
    Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Antonina
    et al.
    Stockholms universitet.
    Oxelheim, LarsLunds universitet.Persson, ThomasUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Ett konkurrenskraftigt EU till rätt pris2013Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Som ett led i att uppnå en uthållig lösning på den ekonomiska krisen står nu EU inför utmaningen att stärka sin konkurrenskraft på den globala arenan. Samtidigt har medlemsländerna ambitionen att bygga ut EU-samarbetets sociala dimension och förbättra den sociala och politiska sammanhållningen. I denna bok diskuterar tretton ­ledande svenska forskare inom ekonomi, juridik och statsvetenskap den balansakt som dessa två samtidiga mål kan innebära och utvärderar alternativa vägar framåt.

    Hur kan EU öka sin konkurrenskraft och ­­samtidigt minska de sociala klyftor och svårlösta politiska motsättningar som krisen har genererat? Tål EU-samarbetet att medlemsländerna konkurrerar med varandra istället för att stå samlade på den globala arenan? Och hur påverkas EU:s konkurrenskraft av den alltmer flexibla form som den europeiska integrationen tagit under eurokrisen, där flera medlemsstater står utanför centrala samarbetsområden, inklusive europakten?

  • 7.
    Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Antonina
    et al.
    Stockholm University.
    Oxelheim, LarsLund University.Persson, ThomasUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    EU och de globala obalanserna2014Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Krisåren har urholkat Europeiska unionens politiska och ekonomiska resurser. Samtidigt står Europa inför avgörande utmaningar på den världspolitiska arenan, där nya regionala maktcentra är på väg att etablera sig. Klimathot, fattigdom och människohandel är några av de problem som vittnar om allvarliga globala obalanser. I Europaperspektiv 2014 diskuterar tio ledande forskare inom ekonomi, juridik och statsvetenskap vår tids viktigaste globala frågor och EU-samarbetets betydelse för att driva dem framåt. Klarar EU att upprätthålla sin ambitionsnivå i arbetet med klimatåtgärder, frihandel, bistånd och mänskliga rättigheter? Hur utvecklas EU:s strategiskt viktiga relationer till Afrika, Kina och Ryssland? Har Cathrine Ashton och EU:s nya utrikestjänst lyckats ge unionen en starkare röst i världspolitiken, trots de allt djupare politiska skiljelinjer som krisen skapat mellan medlemsländerna?

  • 8.
    Bennich-Björkman, Li
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Hermansson, Jörgen
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Karlsson, Christer
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Rider, Sharon
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy.
    Waluszewski, Alexandra
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economic History.
    Widmalm, Sten
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Dags för Lemne att lämna2015In: Upsala Nya Tidning, Vol. march 13Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 9.
    Bernitz, Ulf
    et al.
    Stockholm university, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Mårtensson, Moa
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Oxelheim, Lars
    University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Analysing the Prosperity Gap: The Economic, Legal, and Political Challenges Facing the EU2018In: Bridging the Prosperity Gap in the EU: the Social Challenge Ahead / [ed] Ulf Bernitz, Moa Mårtensson, Lars Oxelheim, Thomas Persson, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 10.
    Bernitz, Ulf
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Sweden.
    Mårtensson, MoaUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.Oxelheim, LarsPersson, ThomasUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Bridging the Prosperity Gap in the EU: The Social Challenge Ahead2018Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Bridging the Prosperity Gap in the EU addresses the great social challenge currently facing the European Union. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, the authors invaluably pinpoint both overarching problems and possibilities associated with the social dimension of European integration. 

    Prominent researchers of economics, law and political science tackle this complex issue, providing new solutions within their respective fields of expertise. The chapters cover crucial policy challenges and analyse fundamental mechanisms that limit, or otherwise affect, the evolution of a European social dimension. These insights clarify the far-reaching measures that will be needed to gradually restore the balance between market integration and social protection across the European Union. 

    Illustrating the importance of cohesion, this book is vital for those interested in comparative European studies, from backgrounds in public and social policy, law and economics. 

  • 11. Bernitz, Ulf
    et al.
    Mårtensson, Moa
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Oxelheim, Lars
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    EU har inte råd att blunda för klyftorna2017In: Svenska DagbladetArticle in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 12.
    Bernitz, Ulf
    et al.
    Stockholms universitet .
    Mårtensson, Moa
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Oxelheim, Lars
    Lunds universitet.;Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN).
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Stolta söndagsförkunnelser räcker inte för att minska välfärdsgapet inom EU2017In: Hufvudstadsbladet, no 24/11, p. 26-Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 13.
    Bernitz, Ulf
    et al.
    Stockholm University.
    Oxelheim, LarsLund University.Persson, ThomasUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Välfärdsgapet : EU:s sociala utmaning: Europaperspektiv 20152015Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Kampen mot fattigdom och socialt utanförskap är en av EU:s topprioriteringar efter den globala finanskrisen. Genom Europa 2020-strategin åtar sig unionen att lyfta minst 20 miljoner européer ur fattigdom. Utvecklingen i krisländerna har dock gått i motsatt riktning och de ekonomiska skillnaderna mellan EU:s medlemsstater fortsätter att öka. Är ett bestående välfärdsgap på väg att etablera sig mellan Europas mer välmående ekonomier och de som har halkat efter? Räcker krispolitiken för att säkra unionens sociala sammanhållning, eller behövs nya politiska verktyg? Hur har handlingsutrymmet för den nationella välfärdspolitiken påverkats av den fria rörligheten? Ur dessa perspektiv analyserar forskarna i denna bok en rad centrala frågor: socialförsäkringarna och de sociala rättigheterna, ungdomsarbetslösheten och relationerna på arbetsmarknaden, den sociala tilliten mellan medborgarna och den press som högerpopulismen sätter på de etablerade politiska partierna.

  • 14.
    Bernitz, Ulf
    et al.
    Juridiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.
    Oxelheim, LarsInstitutet för Ekonomisk Forskning, Lunds universitet.Persson, ThomasUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Överlever EMU utan fiskal union?: Europaperspektiv 20112011Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 15.
    Bäck, Hanna
    et al.
    Mannheim University.
    Dumont, Patrick
    University of Luxembourg.
    Meier, Erik
    Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Vernby, Kåre
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Does European Integration Lead to a 'Presidentialization' of Executive Politics?: Ministerial Selection in Swedish Post-War Cabinets2009In: European Union Politics, ISSN 1465-1165, E-ISSN 1741-2757, Vol. 10, no 2, p. 226-252Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In this article, we address recent claims that executive–legislative relations in parliamentary democracies are undergoing important changes owing to either a ‘presidentialization’ or a ‘Europeanization’ of domestic political systems. Therefore, we test empirically whether parliamentary democracies are indeed experiencing changes in executive–legislative relations and whether these developments can, in part, be explained by an increase in European integration. Using data on ministerial selection in Swedish cabinets during the years 1952–2006, we find that there appears to be a slight tendency towards ‘presidentialization’, which is indicated by a decrease in ministers with a parliamentary background being appointed, and that there exists some support for the notion that Sweden’s political and economic integration into the European Union is part of the explanation for this change.

  • 16.
    Bäck, Hanna
    et al.
    Mannheim University.
    Meier, Erik
    Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Party Size and Portfolio Payoffs: The Proportional Allocation of Ministerial Posts in Coalition Governments2009In: Journal of Legislative Studies, ISSN 1357-2334, E-ISSN 1743-9337, Vol. 15, no 1, p. 10-34Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Over 30 years ago, Browne and Franklin (1973) demonstrated that parties in a coalition tend to receive portfolio payoffs in almost perfect proportionality to their seat share. Even though this result has been confirmed in several studies, few researchers have asked what the underlying mechanism is that explains why parties receive a proportional payoff. The aim of this paper is to investigate the causal mechanism linking party size and portfolio payoffs. To fulfil this aim, a small-n analysis is performed. By analysing the predictions from a statistical analysis of all post-war coalition governments in 14 Western European countries, two predicted cases are selected; the coalitions that formed after the 1976 Swedish election and the 1994 German election. In these case studies two hypotheses are evaluated: that the proportional distribution of ministerial posts is the result of a social norm, or that parties obtain payoffs according to their bargaining strength. The results give no support to the social norm hypothesis. Instead, we suggest that proportionality serves as a bargaining convention for the actors involved, thus rendering proportional payoffs more likely.

  • 17.
    Bäck, Hanna
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Parlamentarismens presidentialisering2006In: Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, Vol. 108, no 2, p. 198-203Article in journal (Other scientific)
  • 18.
    Bäck, Hanna
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Vernby, Kåre
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Westin, Lina
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Från statsminister till president?: Sveriges regeringschef i ett jämförande perspektiv.2007Report (Other scientific)
  • 19.
    Bäck, Hanna
    et al.
    Lunds University.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Vernby, Kåre
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Westin, Lina
    Swedish Agency for Public Management.
    Presidentialisation from a Historical Perspective: Ministerial Selection and Reshuffling in Swedish Cabinets2011In: Parliamentary government in the Nordic countries at a crossroads: Coping with challenges from Europeanisation and presidentialisation / [ed] Thomas Persson & Matti Wiberg, Stockholm: Santérus Academic Press Sweden, 2011, p. 245-276Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 20.
    Gustavsson, Sverker
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Karlsson, ChristerUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.Persson, ThomasUppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    The illusion of accountability in the European Union2009Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    This book examines accountability in the EU from different perspectives and considers whether EU citizens have real opportunities for holding decision-makers accountable. This book critically analyses five arguments which claim there are sufficient means for holding decision-makers to account in the Union. The authors examine:

    • The argument that we should rethink the meaning of accountability in the EU context
    • The claim that there is no accountability deficit in the EU because member states have the power to retrieve all delegated competencies
    • The assertion that EU citizens have effective mechanisms for holding those responsible for legislative decision-making to account
    • The contention that the arrangements that obtain at present for holding the executive power in the EU to account are acceptable
    • The belief that the involvement of organised civil society can work as an alternative to traditional forms of accountability

    The main conclusion is that the current institutional set-up and practice of decision-making in the EU is one that merely creates an illusion of accountability.

    Using a strict framework focusing on the difference between formal mechanisms and actual opportunities for accountability, this highly coherent volume will be of interest to students and scholars of European politics, especially those interested in the democratic foundations of the European political system.

  • 21.
    Hermansson, Jörgen
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Att regera under parlamentarism2009In: Regeringsmakten i Sverige: Ett experiment i parlamentarism 1917-2009 / [ed] Jörgen Hermansson, Stockholm: SNS förlag, 2009, p. 9-32Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 22.
    Hermansson, Jörgen
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    En ifrågasatt regeringsform2009In: Regeringsmakten i Sverige: Ett experiment i parlamentarism 1917-2009 / [ed] Jörgen Hermansson, Stockholm: SNS förlag, 2009, p. 199-210Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 23. Heyerdahl, Torbjørn S.
    et al.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Litteraturgranskning: Organisasjonsteori for offentlig sektor2004In: Nordiske Organisasjonsstudier, Vol. 6, no 3, p. 80-84Article, book review (Other scientific)
  • 24. Heyerdahl, Torbjørn S
    et al.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University.
    Offentlige organisasjoner er ingen privat bedrift2004In: Stat & Styring. Forvaltningspolitisk tidsskrift, Vol. 4Article, book review (Other scientific)
  • 25. Juslin, Peter
    et al.
    Winman, Anders
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Can overconfidence be used as an indicator of reconstructive rather than retrieval processes?1995In: Cognition, ISSN 0010-0277, E-ISSN 1873-7838, Vol. 54, no 1, p. 99-130Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In a recent paper Wagenaar (1988) suggested that overconfidence can be used as an indicator of reconstructive processes which allow responses based on inference to be distinguished from responses based on retrieval. The ecological models (Björkman, in press; Gigerenzer, Hoffrage, & Kleinbölting, 1991; Juslin, 1993a, 1993b, 1994) provide a more positive view of the calibration of reconstructive responses. In this paper we compare these two views and argue that overconfidence cannot be considered a reliable indicator of reconstructive processes since people may be well calibrated for tasks that require inference, provided that tasks are selected in an unbiased manner. Instead, we discuss two different models: the response-independence model which is appropriate to retrieval, and the response-dependence model which applies to inference. These two models predict different distributions of solution probabilities and they therefore provide a criterion by which we can distinguish between direct retrieval and reconstruction. In two empirical studies modelled after Experiment 1 in Wagenaar's (1988) paper it is shown that calibration can be very similar and quite reasonable both for tasks that are dominated by inference and tasks that are dominated by retrieval processes. In Experiment 2 we show that the two conditions nevertheless differ in regard to the distributions of solution probabilities in the manner predicted by the two response models presented in the paper. It is proposed that the issue of which is the most appropriate interpretation of solution probabilities is neglected, and that the criterion should be of interest also to applications outside the domain of calibration research.

  • 26.
    Karlsson, Christer
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Gustavsson, Sverker
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Examining the illusion of accountability2009In: The illusion of accountability in the European Union, London: Routledge , 2009Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 27.
    Karlsson, Christer
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Gustavsson, Sverker
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Taking accountability seriously2009In: The illusion of accountability in the European Union, London: Routledge , 2009Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 28.
    Karlsson, Christer
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Statistics.
    Mårtensson, Moa
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government. 7504238200.
    Hur mycket opposition finns det i svensk EU-politik?2018Report (Other academic)
  • 29.
    Karlsson, Christer
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Mårtensson, Moa
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Hur mycket opposition finns det i svensk EU-politik?2019In: EU i riksdagen / [ed] Anna Wetter Ryde och Göran von Sydow, Stockholm: Svenska institutet för europapolitiska studier, Sieps 2019:1op , 2019, p. 37-60Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 30.
    Karlsson, Christer
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    The Alleged Opposition Deficit in European Union Politics: Myth or Reality?2018In: Journal of Common Market Studies, ISSN 0021-9886, E-ISSN 1468-5965, Vol. 56, no 4, p. 888-905Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    According to the opposition deficit thesis’ European Union politics is characterized by aconspicuous absence of opposition to the policies promoted by the EU. However, once we start looking for systematic evidence supporting the claim of an opposition deficit in EU politics, we come up surprisingly empty handed. This article seeks to rectify the lacuna in previous research by examining how much and what type of opposition actually exist in EU politics. The study formulates four hypotheses on the state of political opposition in EU politics, and breaks new ground by testing their validity by use of unique data collected from the Swedish EuropeanAffairs Committee for the period 1995–2016. The results show there is in fact considerably more opposition present in EU politics than has previously been assumed. The opposition deficit thesis thus seems to be more myth than reality.

  • 31.
    Lindgren, Karl-Oskar
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Input and Output Legitimacy: Synergy or Trade-off?: Empirical Evidence from an EU Survey2010In: Journal of European Public Policy, ISSN 1350-1763, E-ISSN 1466-4429, Vol. 17, no 4, p. 449-467Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Since the breakdown of the 'permissive consensus' in the early 1990s we have witnessed an input turn in the debate on EU legitimacy. Many scholars have been arguing for enhancing the input legitimacy of the EU through promoting stakeholder participation and deliberation on important European issues. Yet, others warn that this strategy might not help in increasing overall legitimacy of the EU, since increased input legitimacy could be thought to undermine its output legitimacy by making decision-making less efficient. This article assesses, empirically, the relationship between input and output legitimacy within the context of the EU chemicals policy overhaul. Contrary to what some scholars suggest, we find evidence from a survey that measures aimed at increasing the input legitimacy of the EU also hold the promise of increasing its output legitimacy.

  • 32.
    Lindgren, Karl-Oskar
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Persson, Thomas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
    Participatory Governance in the EU: Enhancing or Endangering Democracy and Efficiency?2011Book (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This book is an empirical assessment of whether participatory governance reforms within the European Union enhance or endanger democracy. The alleged democratic deficit of the EU and its waning legitimacy have inspired scholars and practitioners to look for new ways of improving democracy and efficiency within it. Proponents of participatory governance, including the European Commission, argue that introducing new forums for interest-group participation and deliberation at the EU level will help create a more democratic and effective Union. This book examines the veracity of this claim. It looks at whether it is possible to enhance decision-making efficiency and democratic legitimacy by involving interest group representatives in the formulation and implementation of policy. In doing so, Participatory Governance in the EU employs data from a unique expert survey of stakeholders and EU officials.