Logotyp: till Uppsala universitets webbplats

This thesis is based on an empirical-ethical approach with the overall aim to explore and describe ethical aspects of including assent-aged children in childhood cancer research, and to develop empirically informed, ethically grounded guidance for research practice.

Study I was a qualitative interview study with healthcare professionals in Swedish pediatric oncology. The aim was to investigate their perspectives on ethical values, challenges, and opportunities to strengthen ethical aspects in recruitment of children with cancer to research, and their perspectives on ethical competence. Manifest inductive qualitative content analysis generated five categories: establishing relationships and trust, meeting informational needs, acknowledging vulnerability, balancing roles and interests, and ensuring ethical competence.

Study II was a qualitative interview study with members of the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. The aim was to explore their perspectives on ethical values, challenges, and opportunities to strengthen ethical aspects of participant recruitment in pediatric research, and their perspectives on ethical competence. Manifest inductive reflexive thematic analysis generated three themes: promoting participation, protecting children, and regulatory adherence.

Study III was a qualitative interview study with children, siblings, and parents who had participated in childhood cancer research. The aim was to describe how they experience children’s participation in assent. Latent inductive reflexive thematic analysis generated two themes: a moral and emotional commitment to research, and relational assent: trust, loyalty, andparental constraint.

Study IV was a prescriptive normative study aimed at developing ethically grounded guidance for children’s participation in assent. Using reflective equilibrium, a normative analysis was conducted based on empirical findings from Studies I–III, previous research, moral judgments, ethical principles, and relevant guidelines. The study proposed that childhood cancer research should not only respect children’s autonomy but also actively promote it, acknowledging that relationships and trust can both enable and constrain autonomy.

This thesis contributes to a context-specific understanding of ethical aspects in childhood cancer research, particularly concerning autonomy and vulnerability. It highlights the need to actively support children’s autonomy and participation in assent and the importance of ethical competence in navigating ethical, relational, and clinical complexities in research recruitment. Further, it provides empirically informed normative guidance for research practice.

Children's assent is an ethical and legal requirement for research that involves them. Nevertheless, studies suggest that children with cancer are not always involved in research decisions. This raises important ethical questions about how children's participation in assent should be supported and on what ethical grounds. In this paper, we explore three dimensions of autonomy in research with children: autonomy as a right, as a value, and as relational. We argue that it is important not only to respect children's autonomy but to also promote it as a value, by actively supporting children's autonomy. Central to this approach is an understanding of how relationships and trust can both enable and constrain children's autonomy. We suggest that children's autonomy may be supported in practice through capacity-sensitive participation, child-adapted and iterative information provision. This requires ongoing dialogue that is responsive to children's emotional, cognitive, and relational contexts, with particular attention to fears, decision-making challenges, and voluntariness. While concern for the well-being of children with cancer is essential, it should not be used as a justification to exclude them from the assent process. Respect for children as persons should guide recruitment to paediatric oncology research.

BACKGROUND: Research is crucial to improve treatment, survival and quality of life for children with cancer. However, recruitment of children for research raises ethical challenges. The aim of this study was to explore and describe ethical values and challenges related to the recruitment of children with cancer for research, from the perspectives and experiences of healthcare professionals in the Swedish context. Another aim was to explore their perceptions of research ethics competence in recruiting children for research.

METHODS: An explorative qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with key informants. Seven physicians and ten nurses were interviewed. Interviews were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS: The respondents' ethical challenges and values in recruitment mainly concerned establishing relationships and trust, meeting informational needs, acknowledging vulnerability, and balancing roles and interests. Ensuring ethical competence was raised as important, and interpersonal and communicative skills were highlighted.

CONCLUSION: This study provides empirical insight into recruitment of children with cancer, from the perspectives of healthcare professionals. It also contributes to the understanding of recruitment as a relational process, where aspects of vulnerability, trust and relationship building are important, alongside meeting informational needs. The results provide knowledge on the complexities raised by paediatric research and underpin the importance of building research ethics competence to ensure that the rights and interests of children with cancer are protected in research.

Research ethics committees (RECs) have a crucial role in protecting children in research. However, studies on REC members’ perspectives on paediatric research are scarce. We conducted a qualitative study to explore Swedish scientific REC members’ perspectives on ethical aspects in applications involving children with severe health conditions. The REC members considered promoting participation, protecting children and regulatory adherence to be central aspects. The results underscored the importance of not neglecting ill children’s rights to adapted information and participation. REC members supported a contextual and holistic approach to vulnerability and risk, which considers the child’s and parents’ psychological wellbeing and the child’s integrity, both short and long term. The ethical complexity of paediatric research requires continuous ethical competence development within RECs.

Background: The design and conduct of research to develop, test, and evaluate complex health care interventions is challenging. Although the existing literature describes key challenges associated with the design and conduct of definitive (evaluation) trials, there is a lack of information concerning specific challenges associated with the intervention development phase and setup of feasibility studies. In particular, the literature is scarce concerning the challenges associated with conducting digital health care research, such as research on internet-administered interventions and research using digital features to support the execution of study procedures (eg, recruitment, consent, retention, and data collection and management). This study is conducted in the context of the intervention development and feasibility study setup phases of an internet-administered, guided, low-intensity cognitive behavioral therapy-based intervention for parents of children previously treated for cancer.

Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the challenges experienced during the development phase of the internet-administered intervention and digital features to support the execution of the study procedures and a feasibility study setup.

Methods: To explore the key challenges experienced, we conducted a document analysis of written records from all study meetings held by the research team (meeting minutes) between June 7, 2018, and January 10, 2020, guided by a thematic analysis approach. Furthermore, discussion groups with members of the research team were held to develop a more detailed understanding of the key challenges experienced. Methods and results are reported in accordance with the relevant items from the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.

Results: Six main themes were identified: decision-making and communication, expertise, external constraints, flexibility, planning and scheduling, and technical constraints.

Conclusions: Significant challenges were experienced during the intervention development and setup phases of the feasibility study. Implications are discussed to inform future design, conduct, and planning of internet-administered intervention development and feasibility studies, especially within the context of digital health care research.

Objective: To investigate the effects of a 6-week smartphone compassion training intervention on mental health.

Method: Fifty-seven Swedish university students (mean age = 25, SD = 5) reporting high levels of stress were randomized to compassion training (n = 23), mindfulness (n = 19), or waitlist (n = 15).

Result: Multilevel models indicated that both compassion and mindfulness training increased self-compassion compared to the waitlist, while only compassion significantly reduced stress. Between-group effect sizes for compassion compared to waitlist were large for both self-compassion (d = 1.61) and stress (d = 0.94). Compassion and mindfulness did not differ significantly, but effect sizes were in favor of compassion. Secondary outcomes indicated positive effects on emotional awareness, while no effect was found for global psychological distress.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that compassion training via a smartphone application can improve self-compassion and reduce stress among university students. Future studies in larger clinical samples are warranted.

Introduction: Recruitment into clinical trials is a common challenge experienced by healthcare researchers. Currently, there is little evidence regarding strategies to improve recruitment into clinical trials. However, preliminary research suggests the personalisation of study invitation letters may increase recruitment rates. As such, there is a need to investigate the effectiveness of personalisation strategies on trial recruitment rates. This study within a trial (SWAT) will investigate the effect of personalised versus non-personalised study invitation letters on recruitment rates into the host trial ENGAGE, a feasibility study of an internet-administered, guided, Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT) based self-help intervention for parents of children previously treated for cancer.

Methods: An embedded randomised controlled trial (RCT) will investigate the effectiveness of a personalised study invitation letter including the potential participant's name and address compared with a standard, non-personalised letter without name or address, on participant recruitment rates into the ENGAGE study. The primary outcome is differences in the proportion of participants recruited, examined using logistic regression. Results will be reported as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Discussion: Even moderate effects of the personalisation of study invitation letters on recruitment rates could be of significant value by shortening study length, saving resources, and providing a faster answer to the clinical question posed by the study. This protocol can be used as a template for other researchers who wish to contribute to the evidence base for trial decision-making, by embedding a similar SWAT into their trial.

Trial registration: ISRCTN 57233429; ISRCTN 18404129; SWAT 112, Northern Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT repository (2018 OCT 1 1231).