Open this publication in new window or tab >>2022 (English)In: Frontiers in Psychology, E-ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 13, article id 989319Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Purpose: To explore and describe a trained communication partnerâs use of responsive strategies in dyadic interaction with adults with Rett syndrome.
Introduction: Responsive partner strategies facilitate social, communicative, and linguistic development. The common feature is that the communication partner responds contingently to the otherâs focus of attention and interprets their acts as communicative. Research on responsive partner strategies that involves individuals with significant communication and motor disabilities remains sparse. The same applies to if, and how, the use of communication aids impacts on the partnerâs use of responsive strategies.
Materials and methods: A therapist, trained in responsive partner strategies and aided communication interacted during 14 sessions with each of three participants. The participants were adults with Rett syndrome. A gaze-controlled device and responsive strategies were used during all sessions. The Responsive Augmentative and Alternative Communication Style scale (RAACS) was used to assess the partnerâs responsiveness. RAACS consists of 11 items including ratings of to what extent the partner is being attentive to, confirms, and expands the individualâs communication. During eight of the 14 sessions, aided AAC Modelling was also used, i.e., the communication partner pointed at symbols on the gaze-controlled device while interacting. In addition to RAACS, each time the communication partner confirmed or expanded on communication when (a) the participants used the gaze-controlled device and (b) the participants did not use the gaze-controlled device was counted. Descriptive statistics were used to present the results. Non-parametric tests were used to compare means between the two conditions and between participants.
Results: Inter-rater agreement for the different RAACS items ranged from 0.73 to 0.96 and was thus found to be fair to excellent. The communication partnerâs use of responsive strategies varied when communicating with different participants and the scores were higher when aided AAC modeling was used. The communication partnerâs number of responses and use of responsive strategies were higher when the participants communicated through a gaze-controlled device.
Conclusion: The communication partnerâs use of responsive and scaffolding strategies is not a fixed construct but varies in interactions with different non-speaking persons. The same is true whether the non-speaking person uses a gaze-controlled device with digitized speech or not.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media S.A., 2022
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-486252 (URN)10.3389/fpsyg.2022.989319 (DOI)000868229900001 ()36248576 (PubMedID)
Note
De två sista författarna delar sistaförfattarskapet.
2022-10-052022-10-052023-08-29Bibliographically approved