Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

Amplification of the MYCN proto-oncogene serves as a key marker of aggressive disease and poor treatment outcomes in certain pediatric tumors originating from the nervous system, including neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma. However, the complex nature of the challenging MYCN protein underscores the urgent need for additional targets and therapies to tackle neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma. In this study, with a primary focus on neuroblastoma and the aim of also benefiting children with medulloblastoma, we identified FLIX5, a small compound that exhibits broad cytotoxicity against both neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma cells, primarily by triggering apoptosis. Furthermore, FLIX5 enhances the cholesterol dependency of neuroblastoma cells under conditions where mitochondrial function is impaired. FLIX5 as well shows a synergistic effect when combined with vincristine, a conventional anticancer drug, against neuroblastoma cells and organoids. Through proteome integral solubility alteration, computational molecular docking predictions, and cellular thermal shift assays for target identification and validation, FLIX5 reveals EPLIN (Epithelial Protein Lost In Neoplasm) as a previously unexplored drug target. EPLIN is involved in several cellular processes, including cholesterol uptake and mitochondrial function. The discovery of FLIX5 targeting EPLIN presents new opportunities for treating malignant pediatric tumors, with the potential to target chemoresistant dormant cancer cells and broaden its therapeutic applications to other tumor types.

Background: KRAS and NRAS mutations (mt) are drivers in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We studied frequencies, characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of different KRASmt and NRASmt in population-based and real-world settings.

Methods: Three Nordic cohorts were combined and molecularly characterised for KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF-V600E hotspot mutations.

Results: Of 2649 mCRC patients, 2118 were molecularly classified. KRASmt were seen in 49%, NRASmt in 4%, RAS&BRAFwt in 33%, and BRAF-V600Emt in 14%. No differences in clinical characteristics were observed between KRASmt and NRASmt. Median overall survival (OS) was longest among RAS&BRAFwt, intermediate among KRASmt and NRASmt, and shortest among BRAF-V600Emt (28.3 vs 21.4 vs 26.3 vs 9.2 months, respectively). Among the eight most common KRASmt, the only clinical difference was that KRAS-G12S had more distant lymph node metastases (38% vs 18-27%, p = 0.041). KRAS-G12S had shorter OS than KRAS-G12V, KRAS-G12C, KRAS-G12A, and KRAS-G13D. The differences were smaller in treatment groups but withstood in multivariable models. The three most common NRASmt did not differ clinically.

Conclusion: KRASmt and NRASmt are seen in 49% and 4% of mCRC, respectively. No clinically relevant differences were observed between different RASmt. KRASmt is a common subgroup for which the outcome hopefully can be improved with newly developed drugs.

The Arylamine-N-acetyltransferase-2 (NAT2) enzyme is involved in metabolism of commonly used drugs driving differences in efficacy and tolerability of treatments. To bridge the current knowledge gap on metabolism of cytotoxic drugs by NAT2, and identify anticancer agents whose effects depend on NAT2 activity, we assessed 147 clinically used drugs. Hit compounds were evaluated for metabolic conversion by acetylation in presence of recombinant NAT2. Among those 147 drugs we found doxorubicin, daunorubicin, epirubicin, valrubicin, teniposide, afatinib, carmustine, vincristine, panobinostat, and vorinostat to have increased toxicity to cancer cells expressing the rapid NAT2 allele. Additionally, we report NAT2-mediated acetylation of idarubicin, daunorubicin, doxorubicin, vorinostat, and CUDC-101. These findings have implications for pharmacogenomics and cancer precision medicine using conventional chemotherapeutic drugs, as improving their efficacy and safety may affect >4 million cancer patients worldwide that receive these drugs as standard of care.

Background

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in trials are selected. The aim was to study mCRC features population-based.

Methods

All 765 mCRC patients in the Uppsala region, Sweden, 2010–2020 were identified and analysed for RAS (n = 356/708) and BRAF-V600E (n = 123/708) mutations (mt) and deficient mismatch repair (dMMR, n = 58/643).

Results

Right colon primary tumours were associated with BRAF-V600Emt and dMMR and had worse median overall survival (mOS) than left colon or rectal mCRC. RAS&BRAF wildtype (wt) and proficient MMR were seen in 22%, 45%, and 31% of right colon, left colon, and rectum, respectively. Patients with right colon primaries received best supportive care only more often (34% vs 25% vs 24%) and metastasectomy less often (21% vs 31% vs 33%) than left colon and rectal primaries. In molecularly homogeneous subgroups (RAS&BRAFwt/RASmt/BRAF-V600Emt/dMMR) no difference in mOS were seen between right and left colon primaries, whereas rectal primaries had better mOS (26/15/8/9 vs 24/21/8/8 vs 32/23/6/NA months, respectively). This was also the case in homogenous treatment groups. Primary tumour location turned non-significant in multivariable OS analyses.

Conclusions

The high variation of BRAF-V600Emt, RASmt, dMMR, and treatment allocation population-based per primary tumour location explain the poor outcome in right-sided cancers.

BRAF-V600E mutation (mt) is a strong negative prognostic and predictive biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Non-V600Emt, designated atypical BRAFmt (aBRAFmt) are rare, and little is known about their frequency, co-mutations and prognostic and predictive role. These were compared between mutational groups of mCRC patients collected from three Nordic population-based or real-world cohorts. Pathology of aBRAFmt was studied. The study included 1449 mCRC patients with 51 (3%) aBRAFmt, 182 (13%) BRAF-V600Emt, 456 (31%) RAS&BRAF wild-type (wt) and 760 (52%) RASmt tumours. aBRAFmt were seen in 2% of real-world and 4% of population-based cohorts. Twenty-six different aBRAFmt were detected, 11 (22%) class 2 (serrated adenocarcinoma in 2/9 tested), 32 (64%) class 3 (serrated in 15/25) and 4 (8%) unclassified. aBRAFmt patients were predominantly male, had more rectal primaries, less peritoneal metastases, deficient mismatch repair in one (2%), and better survival after metastasectomy (89% 5-year overall survival [OS]-rate) compared with BRAF-V600Emt. aBRAFmt and BRAF-V600Emt had poorer performance status and received fewer treatment lines than RAS&BRAFwt and RASmt. OS among aBRAFmt (median 14.4 months) was longer than for BRAF-V600Emt (11.2 months), but shorter than for RAS&BRAFwt (30.5 months) and RASmt (23.4 months). Addition of bevacizumab trended for better OS for the aBRAFmt. Nine patients with aBRAFmt received cetuximab/panitumumab without response. aBRAFmt represents a distinct subgroup differing from other RAS/BRAF groups, with serrated adenocarcinoma in only half. OS for patients with aBRAFmt tumours was slightly better than for BRAF-V600Emt, but worse than for RASmt and RAS&BRAFwt. aBRAFmt should not be a contraindication for metastasectomy.

Rectal cancer poses challenges in preoperative treatment response, with up to 30% achieving a complete response (CR). Personalized treatment relies on accurate identification of responders at diagnosis. This study aimed to unravel CR determinants, overall survival (OS), and time to recurrence (TTR) using clinical and targeted sequencing data. Analyzing 402 patients undergoing preoperative treatment, tumor stage, size, and treatment emerged as robust response predictors. CR rates were higher in smaller, early-stage, and intensively treated tumors. Targeted sequencing analyzed 216 cases, while 120 patients provided hotspot mutation data. KRAS mutation dramatically reduced CR odds by over 50% (odds ratio [OR] = 0.3 in the targeted sequencing and OR = 0.4 hotspot cohorts, respectively). In contrast, SMAD4 and SYNE1 mutations were associated with higher CR rates (OR = 6.0 and 6.8, respectively). Favorable OS was linked to younger age, CR, and low baseline carcinoembryonic antigen levels. Notably, CR and an APC mutation increased TTR, while a BRAF mutation negatively affected TTR. Beyond tumor burden, SMAD4 and SYNE1 mutations significantly influenced CR. KRAS mutations independently correlated with radiotherapy resistance, and BRAF mutations heightened recurrence risk. Intriguingly, non-responding tumors with initially small sizes carried a higher risk of recurrence. The findings, even if limited in addition to the imperfect clinical factors, offer insights into rectal cancer treatment response, guiding personalized therapeutic strategies. By uncovering factors impacting CR, OS, and TTR, this study underscores the importance of tailored approaches for rectal cancer patients. These findings, based on extensive analysis and mutation data, pave the way for personalized interventions, optimizing outcomes in the challenges of rectal cancer preoperative treatment.

Background

Co-occurring mutations in pairs of genes can pinpoint clinically relevant subgroups of cancer. Most colorectal cancers (CRCs) are microsatellite stable (MSS) and have few frequent mutations. Large patient cohorts and broad genomic coverage are needed for comprehensive co-mutation profiling.

Methods

Co-mutations were identified in a population-based Swedish cohort analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (n=819 stage I-IV MSS CRCs). Prognostic value was further evaluated in a publicly available dataset of clinically sequenced metastatic CRCs (MSK-IMPACT; n=934 MSS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses with clinicopathological parameters were performed for locoregional (stage I-III) and metastatic (stage IV and recurrent) cancers separately.

Results

Prevalent co-mutations were detected in 23 unique gene pairs, 20 of which included APC, TP53, KRAS and/or PIK3CA. Several co-mutations involving APC were associated with good overall survival in locoregional CRC, including APC-TCF7L2 (multivariable HR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89). This co-mutation was prognostic also in metastatic cancers (multivariable HR: 0.49 and 0.37, 95% CI: 0.24-0.98 and 0.17-0.82 in the Swedish and MSK cohorts, respectively). APC-SOX9 co-mutations were mutually exclusive with APC-TCF7L2, and the co-mutations combined had stronger prognostic associations than APC alone in both metastatic cohorts. BRAF p.V600E-RNF43 co-mutations were associated with poor overall and recurrence-free survival in locoregional CRC (multivariable HR: 4.13 and 3.2, 95% CI: 1.78-9.54 and 1.53-8.04, respectively).

Conclusions

We report a genome-wide evaluation of co-occurring mutations in MSS CRCs, and suggest that co-mutations can improve the prognostic stratification compared to single mutations alone.

PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning-based algorithm that automatically and accurately classifies patients as either having pulmonary emboli or not in CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: For model development, 700 CTPA examinations from 652 patients performed at a single institution were used, of which 149 examinations contained 1497 PE traced by radiologists. The nnU-Net deep learning-based segmentation framework was trained using 5-fold cross-validation. To enhance classification, we applied logical rules based on PE volume and probability thresholds. External model evaluation was performed in 770 and 34 CTPAs from two independent datasets.

RESULTS: A total of 1483 CTPA examinations were evaluated. In internal cross-validation and test set, the trained model correctly classified 123 of 128 examinations as positive for PE (sensitivity 96.1 %; 95 % C.I. 91-98 %; P < .05) and 521 of 551 as negative (specificity 94.6 %; 95 % C.I. 92-96 %; P < .05), achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 96.4 % (95 % C.I. 79-99 %; P < .05). In the first external test dataset, the trained model correctly classified 31 of 32 examinations as positive (sensitivity 96.9 %; 95 % C.I. 84-99 %; P < .05) and 2 of 2 as negative (specificity 100 %; 95 % C.I. 34-100 %; P < .05), achieving an AUROC of 98.6 % (95 % C.I. 83-100 %; P < .05). In the second external test dataset, the trained model correctly classified 379 of 385 examinations as positive (sensitivity 98.4 %; 95 % C.I. 97-99 %; P < .05) and 346 of 385 as negative (specificity 89.9 %; 95 % C.I. 86-93 %; P < .05), achieving an AUROC of 98.5 % (95 % C.I. 83-100 %; P < .05).

CONCLUSION: Our automatic pipeline achieved beyond state-of-the-art diagnostic performance of PE in CTPA using nnU-Net for segmentation and volume- and probability-based post-processing for classification.

Validation of biobanks and large cancer cohorts is essential in ensuring high-quality research results. We examined the coverage, generalisability and validity of the lymphoma collection of the Uppsala-Umeå Comprehensive Cancer Consortium (U-CAN) biobank in Sweden, one of the largest cancer biobanks in Europe. Up until 2022, 889 lymphoma patients in U-CAN Uppsala had available samples, and 329 in U-CAN Umeå. Patients diagnosed in the U-CAN Uppsala area 2011-2021 (n = 843) were linked to the nationwide Swedish Lymphoma Register, and a subset diagnosed before 2019 (n = 727) to population-based registers. The coverage was 39% of all lymphoma patients between 2011 and 2019 diagnosed in the U-CAN Uppsala area, with a pandemic decline to 10% during 2020-2021. The patients included had superior overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.70 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.60-0.82]) than all lymphoma patients in Sweden. They had better performance status, were younger (odds ratio [OR] = 0.21 [95% CI: 0.13-0.34]) and had less comorbidities (OR = 0.66 [95% CI: 0.56-0.78]). However, cause-specific survival and stage distribution were similar. The questionnaire data captured less comorbidities compared to the national registers. Evaluations of biobanks are important, as even population-based biobanks such as U-CAN select younger patients with higher socioeconomical status and better performance status. However, the similar cause-specific survival as in the registries suggests U-CANs usefulness for prognostic biomarker studies.