Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Alternative names
Publications (10 of 35) Show all publications
Andersson, H., Blind, I., Brunåker, F., Dahlberg, M., Fredriksson, G., Granath, J. & Liang, C.-Y. (2026). What is in a label? On neighborhood labeling, stigma and housing prices. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 118, Article ID 104191.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>What is in a label? On neighborhood labeling, stigma and housing prices
Show others...
2026 (English)In: Regional Science and Urban Economics, ISSN 0166-0462, E-ISSN 1879-2308, Vol. 118, article id 104191Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Place-based policies that allocate resources to specific areas inadvertently also designate these areas as needing assistance, potentially leading to the development of neighborhood stigma. The common coupling of resource allocation and area designation makes it difficult to measure the stigma effect. However, the Swedish police’s listing of “vulnerable” neighborhoods, initially introduced in 2015, lacked accompanying resources, offering a unique opportunity to examine the isolated impact of place-based policies on stigma. We study the stigma associated with unfavorable area labels through an analysis of how police listings affect housing prices — a reliable measure of location value. Employing the synthetic control method, we find that the list resulted in an average price decrease of 3.6% within one year and 6.5% within six years in the designated neighborhoods. In line with ideas of racial stigma, we also find that areas with a higher proportion of minority residents prior to classification experienced more pronounced negative effects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2026
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-577802 (URN)10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2026.104191 (DOI)001673024700001 ()2-s2.0-105027569658 (Scopus ID)
Funder
The Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation
Available from: 2026-01-28 Created: 2026-01-28 Last updated: 2026-02-13Bibliographically approved
Elinder, M., Hu, X., Liang, C.-Y. & Minckley, S. (2025). Mind the Tap: How Volumetric Pricing Affects Residential Hot Water Consumption. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 12(2), 389-426
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Mind the Tap: How Volumetric Pricing Affects Residential Hot Water Consumption
2025 (English)In: Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, ISSN 2333-5955, E-ISSN 2333-5963, Vol. 12, no 2, p. 389-426Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Water is an increasingly scarce resource. However, in many multifamily buildings, water is included in the rent, and tenants can consume an unlimited amount at a fixed cost, with no monetary incentives for saving water. Using high-frequency data over multiple years and a staggered implementation of apartment-level billing, we investigate the effects of volumetric pricing on hot water use. Our results show that individual billing decreases consumption by approximately 18%. The response is rather immediate and appears to be permanent. Additionally, estimated effects are remarkably homogeneous across different consumption quartiles, apartments with varying characteristics, and days of the week, and evenly distributed between bathroom and kitchen usage. Our cost-benefit analysis indicates that price interventions can cost-effectively reduce the consumption of hot water. Moreover, the effect of individual billing is of an order of magnitude higher than previously estimated effects of nonpecuniary incentives and providing more information about water consumption.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
University of Chicago Press, 2025
Keywords
D12, Q21, Q25, Q28, residential water consumption, water conservation, individual metering and billing, volumetric pricing
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-550390 (URN)10.1086/731462 (DOI)001411450800001 ()
Available from: 2025-02-20 Created: 2025-02-20 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved
Blomquist, S., Kumar, A., Liang, C.-Y. & Newey, W. K. (2025). Nonlinear budget set regressions in random utility models: Theory and application to taxable income. Journal of Econometrics, 252(Part B), Article ID 105859.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Nonlinear budget set regressions in random utility models: Theory and application to taxable income
2025 (English)In: Journal of Econometrics, ISSN 0304-4076, E-ISSN 1872-6895, Vol. 252, no Part B, article id 105859Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper is about the nonparametric regression of a choice variable on a nonlinear budget set under utility maximization with general heterogeneity, i.e. in the random utility model (RUM). We show that utility maximization and convex budget sets make this regression three dimensional with a more parsimonious specification than previously derived. We show that nonconvexities in the budget set will have little effect on these results in important cases. We characterize all the restrictions of utility maximization on the budget set regression and show how to check these restrictions in applications. We formulate budget set effects that can be identified by this regression and give automatic debiased machine learners of these effects. We consider use of control functions to allow for endogeneity. Throughout we take as the main example the effect of taxes on taxable income including accounting for productivity growth. In an application to Swedish data we find the taxable income elasticity of a change in the slope of each segment to be .52, that the regression satisfies the restrictions of utility maximization at the values chosen for over 95% of observations, and that a productivity growth rate we estimate is close to other estimates.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025
Keywords
Nonlinear budget sets, Nonparametric estimation, Heterogeneous preferences, Taxable income, Revealed stochastic preference
National Category
Economics Transport Systems and Logistics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-574313 (URN)10.1016/j.jeconom.2024.105859 (DOI)001633190700008 ()2-s2.0-85205340260 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2025-12-29 Created: 2025-12-29 Last updated: 2026-07-01Bibliographically approved
Dahlberg, M., Liang, C.-Y. & Kohl, S. (2024). En analys av den geografiska inkomstojämlikheten i Sverige 1991–2017. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 126(5), 901-918
Open this publication in new window or tab >>En analys av den geografiska inkomstojämlikheten i Sverige 1991–2017
2024 (Swedish)In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 126, no 5, p. 901-918Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

An Analysis of the Geographic Income Inequality in Sweden 1991–2017 This article studies the income polarisation between urban and rural areas in Sweden and how this polarisation has changed between 1991 and 2017. Using indi-vidual-level data covering the entire population over the entire period, we find that income differences are mainly driven by differences between municipalities with varying degrees of urbanisation rather than differences between urban and rural areas within municipalities. Rural municipalities have lower incomes than the more urban municipalities, and the income gap has increased over time. A higher degree of urbanisation in the municipality is associated with higher incomes and better income development in both the more urban parts of the municipality and its rural areas. When we compare the income development between urban and rural areas within municipalities, we find that while income levels were indeed lower in rural areas in 1991, the entire gap had been closed by 2017. The findings suggest that studies about the urban-rural cleavage lines are geography-sensitive, and that equalising policies should aim for differences between regions and municipalities rather than differences within municipalities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Fahlbeckska stiftelsen, 2024
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-573914 (URN)
Available from: 2025-12-18 Created: 2025-12-18 Last updated: 2026-04-20Bibliographically approved
Kumar, A. & Liang, C.-Y. (2024). Labor Market Effects of Credit Constraints: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 16(3), 1-26
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Labor Market Effects of Credit Constraints: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
2024 (English)In: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, ISSN 1945-7731, E-ISSN 1945-774X, Vol. 16, no 3, p. 1-26Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We exploit the 1997 and 2003 constitutional amendments in Texas- allowing home equity loans and lines of credit for nonhousing purposes-as natural experiments to estimate the effect of easier credit access on the labor market. Using state-level as well as micro data, we find that easier access to housing credit led to a notably lower labor force participation rate between 1997 and 2007. Our findings are remarkably robust to improved synthetic control methods based on insights from machine learning. Our research shows that negative labor market effects of easier credit access are important for assessing its stimulative impact on overall growth. ( JEL C45, G21, G51, J16, J22)

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Economic Association, 2024
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-538859 (URN)10.1257/pol.20200683 (DOI)001306770300001 ()
Available from: 2024-10-17 Created: 2024-10-17 Last updated: 2025-11-17Bibliographically approved
Andersson, H., Blind, I., Brunåker, F., Dahlberg, M., Granath, J., Fredriksson, G. & Liang, C.-Y. (2023). Polisens lista över utsatta områden minskar efterfrågan på att bo i de utpekade områdena. Ekonomisk Debatt, 51(8), 53-58
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Polisens lista över utsatta områden minskar efterfrågan på att bo i de utpekade områdena
Show others...
2023 (Swedish)In: Ekonomisk Debatt, ISSN 0345-2646, Vol. 51, no 8, p. 53-58Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [sv]

Sedan hösten 2015 har polisen publicerat en serie rapporter som listar ett sextiotal bostadsområden i Sverige som "utsatta". Dessa listor har fått stort genomslag såväl i media som i den politiska debatten. I denna artikel presenterar vi resultat som ger stöd åt hypotesen att polisens beslut att peka ut "utsatta områden" har påverkat uppfattningen om de utpekade områdena. Vi påvisar en negativ effekt på bostadspriserna av att bli upptagen på polisens lista, både på kort och längre sikt (inom sex år), vilket vi tolkar som en minskad efterfråga på att bo i dessa områden.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nationalekonomiska föreningen, 2023
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-519884 (URN)
Available from: 2024-01-10 Created: 2024-01-10 Last updated: 2024-08-28Bibliographically approved
Hu, X. & Liang, C.-Y. (2022). Does income redistribution prevent residential segregation?. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 193, 519-542
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Does income redistribution prevent residential segregation?
2022 (English)In: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, ISSN 0167-2681, E-ISSN 1879-1751, Vol. 193, p. 519-542Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Living in low-income neighborhoods can have adverse effects. Public policies that reduce income inequality might prevent residential segregation by income. However, previously documented associations between income inequality and residential segregation may not reflect residential sorting effects. We use rich full-population data for Sweden 1990-2017 and take advantage of how in-moving residents change the municipal income composition to rule out the influence of reverse causation and mechanical effects. We find that changing taxes and transfers has limited residential sorting effects on segregation. However, our results strongly suggest that raising the education levels of low-income residents is effective for fighting segregation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ElsevierElsevier BV, 2022
Keywords
Income inequality, Residential segregation by income, Neighborhood sorting, Public redistribution
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-474332 (URN)10.1016/j.jebo.2021.11.012 (DOI)000779845700014 ()
Funder
The Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation, P20-0184
Available from: 2022-05-16 Created: 2022-05-16 Last updated: 2024-01-15Bibliographically approved
Liang, C.-Y. (2021). Inkomstojämlikhet och boendesegregation. SNS - Studieförbundet Näringsliv och Samhälle
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Inkomstojämlikhet och boendesegregation
2021 (Swedish)Report (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SNS - Studieförbundet Näringsliv och Samhälle, 2021
Series
SNS Analys ; 71
Keywords
Fördelningspolitik, Välfärd, Utbildning, Bostäder och infrastruktur, Jämlikhet
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-463701 (URN)
Available from: 2022-01-11 Created: 2022-01-11 Last updated: 2022-01-11
Blomquist, S., Newey, W. K., Kumar, A. & Liang, C.-Y. (2021). On Bunching and Identification of the Taxable Income Elasticity. Journal of Political Economy, 129(8), 2320-2343
Open this publication in new window or tab >>On Bunching and Identification of the Taxable Income Elasticity
2021 (English)In: Journal of Political Economy, ISSN 0022-3808, E-ISSN 1537-534X, Vol. 129, no 8, p. 2320-2343Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The elasticity of taxable income is vital when predicting the effect of taxes. Bunching at kinks/notches has been used to estimate this elasticity. We show that when the preference distribution is unrestricted, bunching at a kink or a notch is not informative about the size of the elasticity, and neither is the entire distribution of taxable income. Bunching identifies the taxable income elasticity when the preference distribution is correctly specified across the kink and provides bounds under restrictions on the preference distribution. We find wide bounds in an empirical example based on upper and lower bounds for the preference density.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
University of Chicago PressUniversity of Chicago Press, 2021
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-454088 (URN)10.1086/714446 (DOI)000655686300001 ()
Available from: 2021-10-04 Created: 2021-10-04 Last updated: 2024-01-15Bibliographically approved
Kumar, A. & Liang, C.-Y. (2020). Estimating taxable income responses with elasticity heterogeneity. Journal of Public Economics, 188, Article ID 104209.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Estimating taxable income responses with elasticity heterogeneity
2020 (English)In: Journal of Public Economics, ISSN 0047-2727, E-ISSN 1879-2316, Vol. 188, article id 104209Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We explore elasticity heterogeneity in the estimation of the elasticity of taxable income (ETI) and propose potentially valid instruments. We show that previously used instruments are not valid and yield weighted averages of ETIs of different taxpayers plus a bias. Using the NBER tax panel for 1979-1990, we find a weighted average ETI of 0.57 when using all available variation in budget set changes provided by the tax reforms in the data. Our results also demonstrate that elasticity heterogeneity is an important explanation for the remarkable divergence of estimates in the previous literature.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV, 2020
Keywords
Elasticity of taxable income, Elasticity heterogeneity, Tax reforms, Panel data
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-422439 (URN)10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104209 (DOI)000564682700004 ()
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare
Available from: 2020-10-28 Created: 2020-10-28 Last updated: 2021-08-23Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-6016-0546

Search in DiVA

Show all publications