Open this publication in new window or tab >>Univ Gothenburg, Inst Neurosci & Physiol, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden..
Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Neurosci, Stockholm, Sweden.;Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Solna, Sweden..
Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Neuromed & Movement Sci, Trondheim, Norway.;Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Trondheim, Norway..
Univ Hosp Northern Sweden, Dept Neurosurg, Umeå, Sweden.;Umeå Univ, Dept Clin Sci, Neurosci, Umeå, Sweden..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Neurosurgery.
Univ Bergen, Fac Med, Dept Clin Med, Bergen, Norway.;Haukeland Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Bergen, Norway..
Linköping Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Linköping, Sweden.;Linköping Univ, Dept Biomed & Clin Sci, Jönköping, Sweden..
Univ Gothenburg, Inst Neurosci & Physiol, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden..
Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Sci, Lund, Sweden.;Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Skane, Sweden..
Univ Hosp North Norway, Dept Neurosurg, Tromso, Sweden..
Univ Hosp Northern Sweden, Dept Neurosurg, Umeå, Sweden.;Umeå Univ, Dept Clin Sci, Neurosci, Umeå, Sweden..
Linköping Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Linköping, Sweden.;Linköping Univ, Dept Biomed & Clin Sci, Jönköping, Sweden..
Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Skane, Sweden..
Univ Bergen, Fac Med, Dept Clin Med, Bergen, Norway.;Haukeland Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Bergen, Norway..
Univ Gothenburg, Inst Neurosci & Physiol, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Neurosurgery.
Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Solna, Sweden.;Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Gothenburg, Sweden.;Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshospitalet, Dept Neurosurg, Copenhagen, Denmark..
Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Trondheim, Norway.;Univ Gothenburg, Inst Neurosci & Physiol, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden.;Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Gothenburg, Sweden..
Show others...
2025 (English)In: Frontiers in Oncology, E-ISSN 2234-943X, Vol. 15, article id 1703756Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background and objectives Maximal safe resection is the cornerstone of diffuse low-grade glioma (dLGG) management, although epidemiological data are limited. We aim to explore surgical selection, techniques, and outcomes in a population-based cohort.Materials and methods This study utilized a multi-center case series (9 out of 10 neurosurgical departments in Norway and Sweden) of all adults (>= 18 years) with histopathologically verified supratentorial dLGG, WHO grade 2, undergoing primary surgery from 2012-2017. Complications within 30 days and neurological outcomes at 3 months were assessed. Pre- and postoperative MRIs were reviewed centrally, blinded to patient outcome and center.Results Of 517 included patients, 217 (41.7%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 44.5 (15.0) years. Biopsy only was performed in 119 (23.0%) patients (13.8-38.9% across centers), and 398 (77.0%) underwent resection (61.1-86.2%). Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) was used in 142 (35.7%, 0-58.7%) resections. The biopsy-only patients were older (52.7 years vs. 42.1 years, P<.001), had larger tumors (56.6 ml vs. 31.9 ml, P<.001), and these tumors were more often eloquently located (86.6% vs. 56.5%, P<.001). The median (IQR) extent of resection (EOR) was 82.9% (63.3-97.7%), 69.7-100.0% across centers. The median (IQR) residual tumor was 4.6 ml (0.5-19.9 ml), 0.0-14.1 ml across centers. Age and histopathology were the most important predictors of EOR. New/worsened neurological deficits occurred in 165 patients (41.5%), 23.1-66.7% across centers, and persisted in 19 (4.8%, 0-22.7%) at 3 months after surgery. A complication was observed in 87 patients (21.4%, 0-31.7%), with 12 patients (3.1%, 0-9.8%) having grade III-IV complications.Conclusions We found that surgical selection was associated with age, tumor size, and location. The median EOR in a population-based cohort was 83%, with age and tumor biology being significant predictors. EOR did not correlate with higher risks or worse neurological outcomes. We provide an epidemiological perspective demonstrating a variation in surgical selection and techniques reflecting persistent controversy in dLGG management.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media S.A., 2025
Keywords
extent of resection, glioma, low-grade glioma, neurological deficits, neurosurgery, oncology, surgical outcomes
National Category
Surgery Neurology Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-575544 (URN)10.3389/fonc.2025.1703756 (DOI)001636528100001 ()41395619 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-105025055762 (Scopus ID)
2026-01-142026-01-142026-01-14Bibliographically approved