Open this publication in new window or tab >> Show others...
2023 (English) In: International Journal of Social Research Methodology, ISSN 1364-5579, E-ISSN 1464-5300, Vol. 26, no 5, p. 549-564Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en] This article seeks to move beyond the Euro/North-centrism recurrent in methodological discussions on what we may learn from the COVID-19 pandemic. Such debates often centre on uncertainty and involuntary immobility – aspects which are hardly new for many researchers. In this article, we argue that the pandemic offers an opportunity to rethink research relations between what we term ‘contracting researchers’ in the Global North and ‘facilitating researchers’ in the Global South. Such relations are often marked by rampant inequalities in remuneration, working conditions, and visibility/authorship. Drawing upon experiences in DR Congo, Sierra Leone, and India, we argue that the pandemic increased the dependence on – and highlighted the invaluable contributions and skills of – facilitating researchers, in part slightly refiguring bargaining power. We also propose pathways for change, arguing for a strong collaborative approach and the need for institutional change, without discarding the responsibilities of individual researchers.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2023
Keywords COVID-19, methodology uncertainty, contracting researchers, facilitating researchers, remote research practices, field research, research ethics, decolonizing research, climate change action
National Category
Social Anthropology Other Humanities
Research subject
Cultural Anthropology
Identifiers urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-497863 (URN) 10.1080/13645579.2023.2173427 (DOI) 000935495900001 ()
Funder Swedish Research Council, 2017-05575
2023-03-032023-03-032025-01-31 Bibliographically approved