Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

Objectives: PTA of protein-unbound ceftriaxone may be compromised in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with augmented renal clearance (ARC). We aimed to determine an optimized ceftriaxone dosage regimen based on the probability of developing ARC on the next day (P-ARC,P-d+1; www.arcpredictor.com). Patients and methods: Thirty-three patients enrolled in a prospective cohort study were admitted to the ICU with severe CAP and treated with ceftriaxone 2 g once daily. Patients contributed 259 total ceftriaxone concentrations, collected during 1 or 2 days (+/- 7 samples/day). Unbound fractions of ceftriaxone were determined in all peak and trough samples (n= 76). Population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation were performed using NONMEM7.4. Target attainment was defined as an unbound ceftriaxone concentration >4 mg/L throughout the dosing interval. Results: A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model described the data well. The maximal protein-bound ceftriaxone concentration decreased with lower serum albumin. Ceftriaxone clearance increased with body weight and P-ARC,P-d+1 determined on the previous day. A high P-ARC,P-d+1 was identified as a clinically relevant predictor for underexposure on the next day (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.77). Body weight had a weak predictive value and was therefore considered clinically irrelevant. Serum albumin had no predictive value. An optimal P-ARC,P-d+1 threshold of 5.7% was identified (sensitivity 73%, specificity 69%). Stratified once- or twice-daily 2 g dosing when below or above the 5.7% P-ARC,P-d+1 cut-off, respectively, was predicted to result in 81% PTA compared with 47% PTA under population-level once-daily 2 g dosing. Conclusions: Critically ill patients with CAP with a high P-ARC,P-d+1 may benefit from twice-daily 2 g ceftriaxone dosing for achieving adequate exposure on the next day.

Background

Higher serum concentrations of vedolizumab have been associated with improved outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease. It is unclear how vedolizumab exposure is linked to endoscopic remission in Crohn disease (CD). We aimed to develop a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model linking vedolizumab exposure to endoscopic remission in CD.

Methods

Data were obtained from the first 110 patients participating in a phase 4 prospective multicenter trial (LOVE-CD; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02646683), where vedolizumab was dosed at 300 mg every 8 weeks and serum concentrations and antibodies to vedolizumab were measured before each infusion. Concentration-time profiles were described by a 2-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination. A first-order discrete-time Markov model was used to describe the relationship between pharmacokinetic exposure metrics and the probability of endoscopic remission (Simple Endoscopic Score for CD < 4).

Results

Linear clearance was 0.215 L/d, and the volume of distribution of the central compartment was 4.92 L. Linear clearance was higher and vedolizumab exposure was lower in patients with lower serum albumin concentrations, in the presence of antibodies to vedolizumab, and in patients with previous exposure to other biologic therapy. A week 22 vedolizumab concentration of 20.0 mg/L was predicted to yield a 35% probability of achieving endoscopic remission at week 26. Model-based simulations suggested that endoscopic remission rates of 46.5% or 40.0% could be reached with every-4-weeks dosing in patients who were naive or previously exposed to biologic therapy, respectively.

Conclusions

Model-informed dosing of vedolizumab in CD provides a foundation for future research aiming to maximize endoscopic remission rates.

Aims: In the UNITI endoscopy sub-study, only 17.4% of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) on ustekinumab achieved endoscopic response and 10.9% of patients achieved endoscopic remission at week (w)44. We aimed to evaluate the impact of alternative ustekinumab dosage regimens on endoscopic outcomes based on population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (popPK-PD) modelling and simulation analysis.

Methods: Real-world data were obtained from 83 patients with moderate-to-severe CD (95% biological-refractory) enrolled in a prospective cohort study receiving intravenous ustekinumab (similar to 6 mg/kg) followed by every eight-week (q8w) subcutaneous maintenance therapy (90 mg). Three sequential models were developed: a two-compartment popPK model linking ustekinumab dose to ustekinumab exposure, an indirect response popPK-PD model describing the effect of ustekinumab exposure on fecal calprotectin (fCal), and a logistic regression outcome model linking fCal to endoscopic outcomes.

Results: Ustekinumab clearance increased with decreasing serum albumin and increasing bodyweight. fCal decreased with increasing ustekinumab exposure. The probability of endoscopic response at w24 increased from 10.0% to 17.9% with fCal at w8 decreasing from 1800 mu g/g to 694 mu g/g (EC50). The probability of endoscopic remission at w24 increased from 2.1% to 10.0% with fCal at w8 decreasing from 1800 mu g/g to 214 mu g/g (EC50). Simulation-based comparison of q8w and q4w maintenance dosing regimens predicted 16.7% and 22.2% endoscopic response rates, respectively. Endoscopic remission rates were estimated to be 4.2% on q8w dosing and 6.7% on q4w dosing.

Conclusions: The developed models can guide clinical trial design and support model-informed dose optimization (stratified or individualized dosing) to improve endoscopic outcomes.

Background: Posaconazole oral suspension emerged as a promising candidate for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised children. Its pharmacodynamic advantages include a broad-spectrum activity and a favorable safety profile; however, they are overshadowed by its large pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, which might cause subtherapeutic exposure. The aim of this study was to develop a population (pop) PK model based on rich sampling data to better understand the PK of posaconazole oral suspension in pediatric patients. Methods: Data were obtained from a prospective interventional study involving hospitalized pediatric patients with a hematologic malignancy and prophylactically treated with posaconazole oral suspension. After constructing the popPK model, the probability of target attainment (PTA; 100% T >= 0.7 mg/L) for prophylaxis under fixed, body weight-based, and body surface area-based dosing was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation. Results: Fourteen patients contributed 112 posaconazole plasma concentrations. The PK of posaconazole was adequately described by a 1-compartment model with lag time 2.71 hours [13%]; nonlinear bioavailability ED50 99.1 mg/m(2) (fixed); first-order absorption rate constant 0.325 hour(-1) [27%]; apparent volume of distribution 1150 L [34%]; and apparent clearance 15.4 L/h [24%] (similar to 70-kg individual). The bioavailability decreased in the presence of diarrhea and co-treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). The unexplained interindividual variability in posaconazole PK remained large. The PTA was <85%, irrespective of the simulated dosing strategy. Patients without diarrhea and not administered a PPI had the highest PTA (85% under the fixed 300-mg dosing 4 times per day). Conclusions: Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended during prophylactic posaconazole therapy in immunocompromised pediatric patients. Large-scale comparative studies are needed to characterize the PK variability between different posaconazole formulations in this cohort.

Bosentan, a well-known cholestatic agent, was not identified as cholestatic at concentrations up to 200 mM based on the drug-induced cholestasis (DIC) index value, determined in a sandwich-cultured human hepatocyte (SCHH)-based DIC assay. To obtain further quantitative insights into the effects of bosentan on cellular bile salt handling by human hepatocytes, the present study determined the effect of 2.5-25 mu M bosentan on endogenous bile salt levels and on the disposition of 10 mu M chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) added to the medium in SCHHs. Bosentan reduced intracellular as well as extracellular concentrations of both endogenous glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA) and glycocholic acid in a concentration-dependent manner. When exposed to 10 mu M CDCA, bosentan caused a shift from canalicular efflux to sinusoidal efflux of GCDCA. CDCA levels were not affected. Our mechanistic model confirmed the inhibitory effect of bosentan on canalicular GCDCA clearance. Moreover, our results in SCHHs also indicated reduced GCDCA formation. We confirmed the direct inhibitory effect of bosentan on CDCA conjugation with glycine in incubations with liver S9 fraction.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Bosentan was evaluated at therapeutically relevant concentrations (2.5-25 mu M) in sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes. It altered bile salt disposition and inhibited canalicular secretion of glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA). Within 24 hours, bosentan caused a shift from canalicular to sinusoidal efflux of GCDCA. These results also indicated reduced GCDCA formation. This study confirmed a direct effect of bosentan on chenodeoxycholic acid conjugation with glycine in liver S9 fraction.

Background Isavuconazole is a triazole antifungal drug, approved for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. Isavuconazole is metabolised by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, and it has been shown that the CYP3A inducer rifampin reduces isavuconazole exposure. By extrapolation, the concomitant use of isavuconazole with moderate and strong CYP450 inducers is contraindicated, although it is known that some CYP450 inducers are less potent in comparison with rifampin. Objectives We aim to document exposure to isavuconazole in patients concomitantly treated with a CYP450 inducer that is less potent compared to rifampin. Moreover, although it is well known that CYP3A enzymes are important for the metabolism of isavuconazole, this induction effect has never been studied in combination with the patient's CYP3A genotype. Patients We report three patients treated with both isavuconazole and a CYP3A inducer that is less potent compared to rifampin (rifabutin or phenobarbital), in whom we determined isavuconazole concentrations. Results These cases suggest that the CYP3A4/5 genotype is an important determinant for isavuconazole exposure and that it might also influence the CYP450 induction interaction. Conclusions CYP3A inducers that are less potent compared to rifampin, may be combined with isavuconazole in patients with loss of CYP3A5 activity (CYP3A5*3/*3). Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended during this combination. However, low-isavuconazole exposure was observed in the extensive metaboliser with CYP3A4*1/*1 and CYP3A5*1/*3 alleles.

The impact of ceftriaxone pharmacokinetic alterations on protein binding and PK/PD target attainment still remains unclear. We evaluated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of unbound ceftriaxone in critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Besides, we evaluated the accuracy of predicted vs. measured unbound ceftriaxone concentrations, and its impact on PK/PD target attainment. A prospective observational cohort study was carried out in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe CAP. Ceftriaxone 2 g q24h intermittent infusion was administered to all patients. Successful PK/PD target attainment was defined as unbound trough concentrations above 1 or 4 mg/L throughout the whole dosing interval. Acceptable overall PK/PD target attainment was defined as successful target attainment in >= 90% of all dosing intervals. Measured unbound ceftriaxone concentrations (CEFu) were compared to unbound concentrations predicted from various protein binding models. Thirty-one patients were included. The 1 mg/L and 4 mg/L targets were reached in 26/32 (81%) and 15/32 (47%) trough samples, respectively. Increased renal function was associated with the failure to attain both PK/PD targets. Unbound ceftriaxone concentrations predicted by the protein binding model developed in the present study showed acceptable bias and precision and had no major impact on PK/PD target attainment. We showed suboptimal (i.e., <90%) unbound ceftriaxone PK/PD target attainment when using a standard 2 g q24h dosing regimen in critically ill patients with severe CAP. Renal function was the major driver for the failure to attain the predefined targets, in accordance with results found in general and septic ICU patients. Interestingly, CEFu was reliably predicted from CEFt without major impact on clinical decisions regarding PK/PD target attainment. This suggests that, when carefully selecting a protein binding model, CEFu does not need to be measured. As a result, the turn-around time and cost for ceftriaxone quantification can be substantially reduced.

Background

Intra-partum cefazolin is used to prevent group B Streptococcus (GBS) vertical transmission in mothers allergic to penicillin without a history of anaphylaxis.

Objectives

To investigate the maternal cefazolin dose–exposure relationship and subsequent maternal and neonatal target attainment at delivery.

Methods

Data were obtained from 24 healthy, GBS-colonized pregnant women (20–41 years), undergoing vaginal delivery (gestational age ≥37 weeks). During labour, all women received a 2 g cefazolin IV infusion. Eight hours later, eight women received another 1 g in the event of delayed (>8 h) delivery. Next to maternal plasma concentrations (up to 10 per dosing interval, until delivery), venous and arterial umbilical cord concentrations were determined at delivery. Target attainment in maternal/neonatal plasma was set at 1 mg/L for 60% of the dosing interval (unbound cefazolin, worst-case clinical breakpoint). A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was built (NONMEM 7.4). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01295606.

Results

At delivery, maternal blood and arterial umbilical cord unbound cefazolin concentrations were >1 mg/L in 23/24 (95.8%) and 11/12 (91.7%), respectively. The popPK of cefazolin in pregnant women was described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Two additional compartments described the venous and arterial umbilical cord concentration data. Cefazolin target attainment was adequate in the studied cohort, where delivery occurred no later than 6.5 h after either the first or the second dose. PopPK simulations showed adequate maternal and umbilical cord exposure for 12 h following the first dose.

Conclusions

PopPK simulations showed that standard pre-delivery maternal cefazolin dosing provided adequate target attainment up to the time of delivery.

Background: There may be a difference between the determinants of amikacin exposure in emergency department (ED) versus intensive care (ICU) patients, and the peak amikacin concentration varies widely between patients. Moreover, when the first dose of antimicrobials is administered to septic patients admitted to the ED, fluid resuscitation and vasopressors have just been initiated. Nevertheless, population pharmacokinetic modelling data for amikacin in ED patients are unavailable.

Objective: The aim of this study was to quantify the interindividual variability (IIV) in the pharmacokinetics of amikacin in patients admitted to the ED and to identify the patient characteristics that explain this IIV.

Methods: Patients presenting at the ED with severe sepsis or septic shock were randomly assigned to receive amikacin 25 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg intravenously. Blood samples were collected at 1, 6 and 24 h after the onset of the first amikacin infusion. Data were analysed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling.

Results: A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on 279 amikacin concentrations from 97 patients. The IIV in clearance (CL) and central distribution volume (V-1) were 71% and 26%, respectively. Body mass index (BMI), serum total protein level, serum sodium level, and fluid balance 24 h after amikacin administration explained 30% of the IIV in V-1, leaving 18% of the IIV unexplained. BMI and creatinine clearance according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation 24 h after amikacin administration explained 46% of the IIV in CL, and 39% remained unexplained.

Conclusion: The IIV of amikacin pharmacokinetics in ED patients is large. Higher doses may be considered in patients with low serum sodium levels, low total protein levels, or a high fluid balance.

Aims: Controversies regarding infliximab treatment in elderly patients with inflammatory bowel diseases remain. We evaluated the effect of patient's age on infliximab exposure, efficacy and safety.

Methods: Retrospective case-control data of patients receiving infliximab induction treatment were analysed. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters. A logistic regression model was used to investigate the effect of exposure on endoscopic remission. Repeated time-to-event models were developed to describe the hazard of safety events over time.

Results: A total of 104 patients (46 elderly, >= 65 years) were included. A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model with linear elimination adequately described the data. Infliximab clearance decreased with older age, higher serum albumin, lower fat-free mass, lower C-reactive protein and absence of immunogenicity. Yet, infliximab exposure was not significantly different between elderly and nonelderly. Regardless of age, an infliximab trough concentration at week (w)14 of 15.6 mg/L was associated with a 50% probability of attaining endoscopic remission between w6 and w22. Infliximab exposure during induction treatment was not a risk factor of (severe) adverse events. The hazard of severe adverse events and malignancy increased by 2% and 7%, respectively, with increasing year of age. Concomitant immunomodulator use increased the hazard of infection by 958%, regardless of age.

Conclusions: Elderly patients attained infliximab exposure and endoscopic remission similarly to nonelderly patients. Therefore, the same infliximab trough concentration target can be used in therapeutic drug monitoring. The hazards of severe adverse events and malignancy increased with age, but not with infliximab exposure.