Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychometric Assessment of the Swedish version of the Work Ability Index in Patients with Chronic Pain in Specialized Care
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Physiotherapy. Uppsala universitet.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Physiotherapy.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5760-7730
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Pain.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3923-4093
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1874-5393, E-ISSN 1875-8894, Vol. 55Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To evaluate the construct validity and internal consistency of the Work Ability Index (WAI) in patients with chronic pain in secondary and tertiary care.

Methods: Cross-sectional study based on 200 patients with chronic pain (> 3 months), with a final sample of 118 participants, 18–64-years-old. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis for the structural validity of the WAI, and by correlating the WAI with EuroQol EQ-5D, Brief Pain Inventory pain severity and interference, Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scales. The study also assessed the discriminant validity of the WAI for occupational status, and the validity of the single-item work ability score. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency.

Results: A single-factor model of WAI was supported. Internal consistency was good. Moderate correlations were found, except for Brief Pain Inventory pain severity, where the correlation was weak; hence, both convergent and divergent validity of the WAI were supported. The work ability score correlated strongly with the total WAI, and the discriminant validity for both was good.

Conclusion: In patients with chronic pain in specialized care, the WAI and the work ability score displayed acceptable construct validity and internal consistency, supporting their use in a clinical context and research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Medical Journals Sweden, 2023. Vol. 55
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-481861DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v55.7146PubMedID: 37753551OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-481861DiVA, id: diva2:1687942
Available from: 2022-08-17 Created: 2022-08-17 Last updated: 2024-12-16Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. A Behavioral Medicine Perspective on Pain Disability in a Work Context: Prevention, Assessment, and Tailored Physiotherapy
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A Behavioral Medicine Perspective on Pain Disability in a Work Context: Prevention, Assessment, and Tailored Physiotherapy
2022 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Chronic pain (>3 months) is associated with work limitations and sick leave. This thesis aimed to evaluate assessments and interventions targeting work disability for individuals at risk of or with chronic pain. Specific aims for studies I and II were to compare the preventive effects of a brief psychosocial program with an active educational control. Study III aimed to evaluate the construct validity and internal consistency of the Work Ability Index (WAI). Study IV aimed to systematically replicate a behavioral medicine physiotherapy intervention within a return-to-work context and evaluate its effects on an individual level.  

Methods: Studies I and II were based on a cluster-randomized controlled trial, including 191 employees with reported pain and/or stress-related ill-health and 53 supervisors. Study I reported on the primary outcome of sick leave and secondary health-related outcomes on employees at 6-months follow-up; study II reported on the supervisors’ communication behavior and perceived stress. Study III was a cross-sectional study including 118 patients with chronic pain referred to specialized care. Study IV was a single case experimental design study including five participants with chronic pain on long-term sick leave. 

Results: In studies I and II, no effects of the brief psychosocial program were found on outcomes on employees or supervisors. In study III, the construct validity and internal consistency of the WAI were supported. In study IV, the physiotherapy protocol was successfully replicated, and the results indicated an effect on task-specific self-efficacy for target activities at work, but not on experience of target activities or work ability.

Conclusion: The results highlight the importance of selecting participants for preventive workplace interventions based on their assessed risk profiles for long-term pain disability, and that targeting mainly the supervisors might be insufficient. The WAI appears to be a valid measurement of work ability for patients with chronic pain in specialized care. Accordingly, behavioral medicine physiotherapy can be successfully adapted to work disability needs for patients with chronic pain. Large-scale trials are needed to evaluate its effects on return-to-work. A behavioral medicine perspective on pain disability in a work context motivates a focus on target activities at work, which can be seen to mediate the incorporation of behavioral knowledge in assessments and interventions for individuals with pain.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2022. p. 83
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 1859
Keywords
Chronic pain, Pain Disability, Work Ability, Prevention, Measurement Properties, Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Research subject
Medical Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-481863 (URN)978-91-513-1573-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2022-10-07, A1:111a, BMC, Husargatan 3, 752 37 Uppsala, 09:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2022-09-13 Created: 2022-08-17 Last updated: 2022-09-13

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(393 kB)162 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 393 kBChecksum SHA-512
e10e60cc7f7e78004b8dfdb77f8b0b120348f1557e0c630c5772be076e9918390e0752721e4ef71d147ffde29d40eef708d0ed27e19d187f2ef2772356b696f7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Zetterberg, HedvigWagner, SofiaEkselius, LisaKarlsten, RolfÅsenlöf, Pernilla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zetterberg, HedvigWagner, SofiaEkselius, LisaKarlsten, RolfÅsenlöf, Pernilla
By organisation
PhysiotherapyDepartment of Women's and Children's HealthAnaesthesiology and Intensive CarePain
In the same journal
Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 162 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 180 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf