Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

OBJECTIVE: Rwanda amended its abortions law in 2012 to allow for induced abortion under certain circumstances. We explore how Rwandan health care providers (HCP) understand the law and implement it in their clinical practice.

DESIGN: Fifty-two HCPs involved in post-abortion care in Kigali were interviewed by qualitative individual in-depth interviews (n =32) and in focus group discussions (n =5) in year 2013, 2014, and 2016. All data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

FINDINGS: HCPs express ambiguities on their rights and responsibilities when providing abortion care. A prominent finding was the uncertainties about the legal status of abortion, indicating that HCPs may rely on outdated regulations. A reluctance to be identified as an abortion provider was noticeable due to fear of occupational stigma. The dilemma of liability and litigation was present, and particularly care providers' legal responsibility on whether to report a woman who discloses an illegal abortion.

CONCLUSION: The lack of professional consensus is creating barriers to the realization of safe abortion care within the legal framework, and challenge patients right for confidentiality. This bring consequences on girl's and women's reproductive health in the setting.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: To implement the amended abortion law and to provide equitable maternal care, the clinical and ethical guidelines for HCPs need to be revisited.