Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
In vivo safety assessment of a bio-inspired bone adhesive
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2422-831x
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedics.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Applied Material Science.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Applied Material Science.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, ISSN 0957-4530, E-ISSN 1573-4838, Vol. 31, no 2, article id 24Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A new class of materials, bone adhesives, could revolutionise the treatment of highly fragmented fractures. We present the first biological safety investigation of a bio-inspired bone adhesive. The formulation was based upon a modified calcium phosphate cement that included the amino acid phosphoserine. This material has recently been described as substantially stronger than other bioresorbable calcium phosphate cements. Four adhesive groups with the active substance (phosphoserine) and two control groups without phosphoserine were selected for in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility testing. The test groups were subject for cell viability assay and subcutaneous implantation in rats that was followed by gene expression analysis and histology assessment after 6 and 12 weeks. All adhesive groups supported the same rate of cell proliferation compared to the alpha-TCP control and had viability between 45-64% when compared to cell control. There was no evidence of an increased immune response or ectopic bone formation in vivo. To conclude, this bio-inspired bone adhesive has been proven to be safe, in the present study, without any harmful effects on the surrounding soft tissue. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SPRINGER , 2020. Vol. 31, no 2, article id 24
National Category
Medical Materials
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-407133DOI: 10.1007/s10856-020-6362-3ISI: 000511787900001PubMedID: 32036502OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-407133DiVA, id: diva2:1415920
Funder
Swedish Research Council, RMA15-390 0110
Note

De två första författarna delar förstaförfattarskapet.

Available from: 2020-03-20 Created: 2020-03-20 Last updated: 2026-03-18Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Applications of Additive Manufacturing for Advancing Cell Models from 2D to 3D
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Applications of Additive Manufacturing for Advancing Cell Models from 2D to 3D
2026 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Two-dimensional (2D) cell culture systems are widely used in preclinical research due to their ease of handling and standardisation, but do not adequately reflect key aspects of the complex three-dimensional (3D) physiological microenvironment. This limits the predictive value of in vitro studies for both drug development and biomaterials research. The overall aim of this thesis was to explore how additive manufacturing supports the transition from 2D to more advanced 3D cell culture models.

In Study I, CombiCTx, a cell culture device for combinatorial anti-cancer drug testing, was developed. The system enables the formation of overlapping drug gradients through diffusion in a hydrogel matrix, and an assay and imaging analysis protocol was established. Using breast cancer cells, it was demonstrated that the assay can identify synergistic drug effects and that, for the drugs tested, these effects were spatially confined to specific regions of the assay space, highlighting the importance of diffusion processes not captured in standard 2D assays.

In Study II, an open source extrusion-based bioprinter based on the E3D motion system was established to increase accessibility to bioprinting technologies. The system supports multimaterial printing and FRESH bioprinting. Collagen scaffolds and cell-laden laminin-containing constructs were printed, and high cell viability was maintained, demonstrating the suitability of the platform for generating 3D cell culture environments.

Studies III and IV focused on biomaterials for bone regeneration. In Study III, the biosafety of a phosphoserine (pSER)-modified calcium phosphate bone adhesive was evaluated. Both in vitro and in vivo results indicated good biocompatibility, with no evidence of adverse immune reactions or ectopic bone formation.

In Study IV, 3D bioprinted collagen-silica hybrid scaffolds modified with pSER were investigated. In vitro experiments showed a dose-dependent effect of pSER in combination with calcium phosphate on cell viability. In vivo, mineralised scaffolds promoted bone formation, suggesting an osteogenic potential of these materials.

In conclusion, the studies presented in this thesis demonstrate that additive manufacturing can be used to develop more advanced in vitro models and to investigate biomaterials in controlled 3D environments. These approaches will contribute to improving the translation of preclinical findings into clinical applications.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2026. p. 73
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 2248
Keywords
3D printing, additive manufacturing, 3D bioprinting, in vitro, biomaterials, combinatorial drug screening, bioink
National Category
Medical Biotechnology
Research subject
Medical Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-582589 (URN)978-91-513-2779-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2026-05-08, A1:107a, Biomedical Center (BMC), Husargatan 3, Uppsala, 09:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2026-04-16 Created: 2026-03-18 Last updated: 2026-04-16

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4350 kB)670 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4350 kBChecksum SHA-512
7e1ca49fd475fa17661d97a771e0c130b0d114d6c8ec6293ccfe006d5f9c6d0ce7603283cb8e20840760d60eb8ce0f7856c6934422e8ad797c0f79515a4f1c7b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Hulsart Billström, GryStelzl, ChristinaProcter, PhilipPujari-Palmer, MichaelEngqvist, HåkanLarsson, Sune

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hulsart Billström, GryStelzl, ChristinaProcter, PhilipPujari-Palmer, MichaelEngqvist, HåkanLarsson, Sune
By organisation
OrthopaedicsApplied Material Science
In the same journal
Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine
Medical Materials

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 674 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 391 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf