This chapter aims at identifying existential and theological learning from hospitality practices, based on fieldwork and autoethnographic studies. Willfulness and attention to the body (Ahmed) is central, as well as a focus on the trouble (Haraway). The author explores the limit between openness and determination, and a perspective of “this is as far as we have come” vs. “this is how far we can go” (Bornemark) in migration issues. The chapter focuses on self-experience as a resource for critical analysis in existential and theological theory and a method for working with aspects of diversity and identity. The material brings together the perspectives of the guests at the hospitality practice as well as the author's own gaze, critically discussing this gaze and her reaction in the interaction with the guests. The chapter shows how there is a continuum of exchange in a relationship, and that there is a need for a broader and more troubling way of negotiating reality, politics, and conceptual models, involving the other as neighbor. The chapter does not attempt to solve disharmonies; rather, it affirms that it is necessary to open the field and enter into it without knowing who the actors are or may become in the relationship.