Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Towards 3D Bioprinted Spinal Cord Organoids
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neuroscience.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences, Nanotechnology and Functional Materials.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0072-4458
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: International Journal of Molecular Sciences, ISSN 1661-6596, E-ISSN 1422-0067, Vol. 23, no 10Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Three-dimensional (3D) cultures, so-called organoids, have emerged as an attractive tool for disease modeling and therapeutic innovations. Here, we aim to determine if boundary cap neural crest stem cells (BC) can survive and differentiate in gelatin-based 3D bioprinted bioink scaffolds in order to establish an enabling technology for the fabrication of spinal cord organoids on a chip. BC previously demonstrated the ability to support survival and differentiation of co-implanted or co-cultured cells and supported motor neuron survival in excitotoxically challenged spinal cord slice cultures. We tested different combinations of bioink and cross-linked material, analyzed the survival of BC on the surface and inside the scaffolds, and then tested if human iPSC-derived neural cells (motor neuron precursors and astrocytes) can be printed with the same protocol, which was developed for BC. We showed that this protocol is applicable for human cells. Neural differentiation was more prominent in the peripheral compared to central parts of the printed construct, presumably because of easier access to differentiation-promoting factors in the medium. These findings show that the gelatin-based and enzymatically cross-linked hydrogel is a suitable bioink for building a multicellular, bioprinted spinal cord organoid, but that further measures are still required to achieve uniform neural differentiation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI AG MDPI, 2022. Vol. 23, no 10
National Category
Nano Technology
Research subject
Engineering Science with specialization in Nanotechnology and Functional Materials
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-475031DOI: 10.3390/ijms23105788ISI: 000804307600001PubMedID: 35628601OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-475031DiVA, id: diva2:1661590
Available from: 2022-05-29 Created: 2022-05-29 Last updated: 2024-12-03Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Towards 3D bio-printed spinal cord organoids
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Towards 3D bio-printed spinal cord organoids
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The development of 3D bioprinting technology has provided a new direction for the replacement of organs or tissues and the development of drug testing models. Testing cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation in different printed scaffolds for creating functional 3D bio-printed structures provides the possibility of establishing a patient-specific in vitro model for neurodegenerative diseases. This thesis aims to establish a 3D bio-printed spinal cord model for drug research of ALS by exploring the factors affecting cell adhesion, growth, and differentiation in different hydrogels, and the suitable printing conditions.

In Paper I, we compared the adhesion and cell survival rates of BCs on the surfaces of the scaffolds with different stiffness and different chemical covering substracts and found the effects of physical and chemical factors for cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation through comparison, which can be used as a reference for exploring the conditions for further 3D printing mixing with cells inside. 

In Paper II, gelatin-based hydrogel was selected as the main material for printing the scaffold. By testing the survival rate of BCs in the different concentrations of gelatin with different concentrations of crosslinker, we selected a protocol that is suitable for cell viability, cell differentiation, and bioprintability. Unfortunately, when this protocol is applied to hiPSCs, it can obtain the viability of cells after printing, but cell differentiation was only observed on the surface of the scaffolds since cells in the middle of the printed structure lack contact with the surrounding culture medium.

Paper III showed that BCs attracted endothelial cells sprouting from aortic rings in their co-cultured 3D-printed scaffolds and guided the migration direction of endothelial cells. Also, after implantation at the injury DRTZ, they helped with vascularization by increasing the blood vessel volume and vessel diameters.

In Paper IV, we improved the protocol from Paper II for hiPSCs-derived MNs by reducing the concentration of gelatin and adding MSP loaded with cintrofin and gliafin. Two printable methods that could keep the printed structures during culturing were tested, and one was chosen for further printing based on cell viability during bio-ink preparation. A lower concentration of gelatin helped with getting better access to the surrounding culture medium and achieving motor neuron differentiation inside the scaffolds.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2024. p. 42
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 2097
Keywords
3D bioscaffold, gelatin, iPSC, differentiation
National Category
Neurosciences
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-540590 (URN)978-91-513-2278-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2024-12-05, A1:107, Husargatan 3, Uppsala, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-11-12 Created: 2024-10-17 Last updated: 2024-11-12

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2772 kB)283 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2772 kBChecksum SHA-512
1cbf2df7ba14e97233e5f464b95d5dda71a6fbad1b6341c7b9b1877b2d59ecb7c0695a2758760047614b78209ad8289c1a05bd24fbc6febf88688111dc0f0190
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedhttps://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/10/5788

Authority records

Han, YilinTikhomirov, EvgeniiKozlova, Elena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Han, YilinTikhomirov, EvgeniiLindh, JonasKozlova, Elena
By organisation
Department of NeuroscienceNanotechnology and Functional Materials
In the same journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Nano Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 283 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 242 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf