Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Efficient Algorithms for Global Multimodal Image Registration
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology, Computerized Image Analysis and Human-Computer Interaction.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0253-9037
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology, Computerized Image Analysis and Human-Computer Interaction.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7312-8222
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology, Computerized Image Analysis and Human-Computer Interaction.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6041-6310
2022 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Multimodal image registration is the process of finding spatial correspondences between images formed by different imaging techniques or under different conditions, to facilitate heterogeneous data fusion and correlative analysis. Two similarity measures widely used in multimodal image registration are mutual information (MI) and similarity of normalized gradient fields (NGF). We propose efficient algorithms for computing MI and similarity of NGF for all discrete axis-aligned shifts in the frequency domain. These fast algorithms enable highly reliable global registration of multimodal images, also for very large displacements,  which we confirm by their performance evaluation on a number of different pairs of modalities.

We consider four datasets, and observe that global maximization of MI is the best choice for two datasets/applications in 2D, while global maximization of similarity of NGF performs best on the remaining two datasets, of which one consists of 2D images, and the other consists of 3D data. This confirms the relevance of both methods; their properties recommend them for application in different scenarios.    

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022.
National Category
Medical Imaging
Research subject
Computerized Image Processing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-490950OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-490950DiVA, id: diva2:1719728
Conference
Swedish Symposium on Image Analysis (SSBA)
Available from: 2022-12-16 Created: 2022-12-16 Last updated: 2025-02-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Öfverstedt, JohanLindblad, JoakimSladoje, Natasa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Öfverstedt, JohanLindblad, JoakimSladoje, Natasa
By organisation
Computerized Image Analysis and Human-Computer Interaction
Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 157 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf