Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

Background: Globally, interprofessional teamwork is described as a key method to promote health and prevent illness in children, namely, to achieve the goals of Child Healthcare Services (CHS). However, how teamwork should be designed within CHS to achieve the goals is unclear. This study aimed to investigate healthcare professionals' perceptions about 1) taking part in interprofessional teamwork, 2) team characteristics, and 3) whether the perceptions were related to professional affiliation or workplace.

Methods: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted using a web-based study-specific questionnaire sent to all accessible nurses, physicians, and psychologists in Swedish CHS (n = 3552). The response rate was 31.5%. To identify possible associations, logistic regressions were conducted.

Results: Almost all respondents, 1096/1119 (97.9%), reported taking part in some type of interprofessional teamwork within the Swedish CHS. Among those, the most common was team-based visits (82.2%). It was perceived that performing team-based visits resulted in fulfilled goals, expertise exceeding individual team members' competences, provision of high-quality care, and meeting children's and families' needs, to a greater extent, than if not performing team-based visits. Correspondingly, working as a team in parental groups was perceived as resulting in fulfilled goals, meeting the needs of children and their families, and continuity within the team to a greater extent than if not working together in a team. Professional affiliation was associated with different perceptions and types of teamwork. Family Centers were positively associated with all types of teamwork as well as continuity within the team.

Conclusions: Healthcare professionals' perceptions about team characteristics were associated with professional affiliation, workplace, and type of teamwork (defined as team activities) within the CHS. Professionals within Swedish CHS, taking part in team-based visits and in interprofessional teamwork in parental groups, perceived that the team fulfilled its goals and met the needs of children and families to a greater extent than professionals not taking part in these types of teamwork. Professionals at Family Centers were more likely to work in teams in different ways. Knowledge about interprofessional teamwork for individuals and groups in Swedish CHS might also be valuable in other healthcare settings, dealing with complex needs.

Complex healthcare needs can be met through effective interprofessional collaboration. Since 2014, Swedish Child Healthcare Services (CHS) include universal team-based visits with a nurse and a physician who perform such visits at the age of 4 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 2.5 to 3 years, as well as targeted team-based visits to address additional needs. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of team-based visits in the Swedish CHS and possible associations between team-based visits and contextual factors that may affect its implementation. A national cross-sectional survey was conducted using a web-based questionnaire distributed to all reachable nurses, physicians, and psychologists (n =3,552) engaged in the CHS. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary and multivariate logistic regressions. The response rate was 32%. Team-based visits were reported by 82% of the respondents. For nurses and physicians, the most frequent indication was specific ages, while for psychologists it was to provide parental support. Respondents working at Family Centers were more likely to perform team-based visits in general, at 2.5 to 3 years and in case of additional needs, compared to respondents working at Child Health Centers (CHC) and other workplaces. In conclusion, team-based visits are well implemented, but the pattern differs depending on the contextual factors. Targeted team-based visits and team-based visits at the age of 2.5 to 3 years are most unequally implemented.

AIM: To investigate both quantitatively and qualitatively the differences between participation in team-based visits (TBVs) and perceived needs for TBVs from the perspectives of healthcare professionals, in the context of the Swedish three-tier national Child Healthcare program.

METHODS: A study-specific questionnaire, including multiple-choice questions with fixed and free-text response options, was developed, and used. To capture healthcare professionals' experiences and find explanations for the quantitative results in qualitative data, a convergent parallel mixed-methods study design was used. Descriptive statistics and McNemar's test were used to analyze the quantitative data, and content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data.

RESULTS: Healthcare professionals perceived the need for TBVs in the Swedish Child Healthcare Services (CHS) to a high extent. The largest difference between the perceived need for TBVs and experienced TBVs was for indications associated with psychosocial problems. The quantitative findings were explored by the qualitative findings. Both individual and organizational factors influenced TBVs.

CONCLUSION: Perceived needs for TBVs in Swedish CHS exceed its existence. Healthcare professionals require TBVs delivered by interprofessional teams, in line with proportionate universalism. Accordingly, organizational structures (e.g., co-location and clear instructions on how to distribute TBVs) and human resources (e.g., psychologists and social worker) are needed.

Background

The Swedish Child Healthcare services (CHS) includes team-based visits. Team-based visits are defined as physical meetings where different professionals, including the child and his or her parents, participate at the same time at the same place. This study aimed to explore healthcare professionals’ experiences of these visits to better understand the opportunities and difficulties in meeting the unique needs of children and their families through team-based visits.

Methods

An explorative qualitative design. Data were obtained through seven digital focus group interviews (FGDs) with 34 professionals within CHS, following the guidelines provided by Krueger and Casey.

Results

All professional groups perceived great opportunities with team-based visits. Optimal team-based visits meant accessible and safe family support, based on children’s and families’ needs. Trustful relationships with someone in the team, can promote families’ trust in the team, the assessment process, and healthcare organizations. For optimal team-based visits in CHS, professional competence, as well as organizational structures, are required. However, without enabling factors, here can be opposite effects on all those involved.

Conclusions

Optimal team-based visits in CHS delivered in the right way, at the right time, by the right individuals can be an efficient and comprehensive way to meet the unique needs of children and families.