Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of STPA with FMEA for analyzing safety of autonomous driving system
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology.
2023 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The safe behavior of an autonomous driving system (ADS) depends upon safe interactions between the system’s software and hardware elements, the surrounding environment, the human driver in the vehicle, organizational and legal requirements, and so on. Traditional safety analysis methods such as failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) and fault tree analysis (FTA) focus on system’s safety due to failure of electrical and electronics components. These methods are unsuitable for handling complex interactions that may pose a safety risk even if no system element fails. STPA is a novel safety analysis method that models the system as a dynamic structure. It analyzes the interacting system elements and provides guidelines to constrain their behavior to ensure safety.  

This thesis explores the safety requirements of an ADS, applies STPA and FMEA to the function-level architecture of a generic ADS, and investigates the suitability of the safety analysis methods to meet the safety requirements of a complex system like ADS. The results of the analyses are validated by conducting interviews with system safety practitioners and seeking their opinion on the process and approaches of the two methods. The study concludes that the methods complement each other, and their different approaches are essential to achieve completeness of safety analysis.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. , p. 123
Series
IT ; 23087
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-513464OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-513464DiVA, id: diva2:1803036
Educational program
Masters Programme in Embedded Systems
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2023-10-06 Created: 2023-10-06 Last updated: 2023-10-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2333 kB)1554 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2333 kBChecksum SHA-512
a3d8ca8005d5d17eea1ef20c691fbcce0592737dfbac542e2bb926781b847c543803d91229898080edc584fe961e492cda1bfb7965584c25d4eb3776b28b92df
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Information Technology
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1554 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1135 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf