Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Plutonium Production under Uranium Constraint
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Applied Nuclear Physics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8207-3462
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Applied Nuclear Physics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7370-6539
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Applied Nuclear Physics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5133-6829
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Science and Global Security, ISSN 0892-9882, E-ISSN 1547-7800, Vol. 31, no 3, p. 115-136Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Production rates of fissile materials are often used to independently assess the number of nuclear warheads a state may possess. One key constraint of a plutonium-based nuclear weapons program is the availability of natural uranium, where a shortage of uranium will constrain plutonium production in the fuel cycle. Recycling of the reprocessed uranium can be used to mitigate such a shortage. Furthermore, since military reactors operate in short cycles to ensure that the plutonium is weapon-grade, it may be possible to operate them using slightly depleted uranium, provided that there are sufficient reactivity margins. Using slightly depleted or recycled uranium, the plutonium production can increase by a factor 2–5 as compared to a once-through scenario, for the same input of natural uranium. For future assessments of a state’s plutonium production, a uranium constraint should only be considered if there is clear evidence that no nuclear fuel cycle involving uranium recycling is implemented, or if evidence exists that the recycling is insufficient to mitigate the constraint.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2023. Vol. 31, no 3, p. 115-136
Keywords [en]
Plutonium production, uranium constraint, reactor, burnup
National Category
Subatomic Physics
Research subject
Physics with specialization in Applied Nuclear Physics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-519520DOI: 10.1080/08929882.2023.2293531ISI: 001131798400001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-519520DiVA, id: diva2:1824906
Funder
Uppsala UniversityAvailable from: 2024-01-08 Created: 2024-01-08 Last updated: 2024-07-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Branger, ErikAndersson, PeterGrape, SophieGustavsson, CeciliaTrombetta, Débora

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Branger, ErikAndersson, PeterGrape, SophieGustavsson, CeciliaTrombetta, Débora
By organisation
Applied Nuclear Physics
In the same journal
Science and Global Security
Subatomic Physics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 321 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf