Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Open notes in psychotherapy: An exploratory mixed methods survey of psychotherapy students in Switzerland
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group. Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0908-6173
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1209-7714
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6839-3651
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Digital Health, E-ISSN 2055-2076, Vol. 10Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

In a growing number of countries, patients are offered access to their full online clinical records, including the narrative reports written by clinicians (the latter, referred to as “open notes”). Even in countries with mature patient online record access, access to psychotherapy notes is not mandatory. To date, no research has explored the views of psychotherapy trainees about open notes.

Objective

This study aimed to explore the opinions of psychotherapy trainees in Switzerland about patients’ access to psychotherapists’ free-text summaries.

Methods

We administered a web-based mixed methods survey to 201 psychotherapy trainees to explore their familiarity with and opinions about the impact on patients and psychotherapy practice of offering patients online access to their psychotherapy notes. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the 42-item survey, and qualitative descriptive analysis was employed to examine written responses to four open-ended questions.

Results

Seventy-two (35.8%) trainees completed the survey. Quantitative results revealed mixed views about open notes. 75% agreed that, in general open notes were a good idea, and 94.1% agreed that education about open notes should be part of psychotherapy training. When considering impact on patients and psychotherapy, four themes emerged: (a) negative impact on therapy; (b) positive impact on therapy; (c) impact on patients; and (d) documentation. Students identified concerns related to increase in workload, harm to the psychotherapeutic relationship, and compromised quality of records. They also identified many potential benefits including better patient communication and informed consent processes. In describing impact on different therapy types, students believed that open notes might have differential impact depending on the psychotherapy approaches.

Conclusions

Sharing psychotherapy notes is not routine but is likely to expand. This mixed methods study provides timely insights into the views of psychotherapy trainees regarding the impact of open notes on patient care and psychotherapy practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2024. Vol. 10
Keywords [en]
Open notes, online record access, patient-centered care, psychotherapy, survey, qualitative survey, clinical psychology, electronic health records, healthcare ethics, informed consent, autonomy
National Category
Applied Psychology Medical Ethics Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Research subject
Medical Informatics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-525779DOI: 10.1177/20552076241242772ISI: 001193788900001PubMedID: 38559581OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-525779DiVA, id: diva2:1847752
Part of project
Beyond Implementation of eHealth, Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2020-01229Available from: 2024-03-29 Created: 2024-03-29 Last updated: 2024-04-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1656 kB)269 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1656 kBChecksum SHA-512
4ce2e0650a55e308f142bd46afdea7d0d017606de4619347bb6592b5224e1a3a3ed5dd924c8be2999b005ac112230c121dc4dcdb407b2bdc5a09cb20b4db1ce6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Kharko, AnnaBärkås, AnnikaHägglund, MariaBlease, Charlotte

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kharko, AnnaBärkås, AnnikaHägglund, MariaBlease, Charlotte
By organisation
Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group
In the same journal
Digital Health
Applied PsychologyMedical EthicsHealth Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 274 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 237 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf