Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Refining outcome prediction after traumatic brain injury with machine learning algorithms
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Neurosurgery.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Scientific Reports, E-ISSN 2045-2322, Vol. 14, no 1, article id 8036Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is typically assessed using the Glasgow outcome scale extended (GOSE) with levels from 1 (death) to 8 (upper good recovery). Outcome prediction has classically been dichotomized into either dead/alive or favorable/unfavorable outcome. Binary outcome prediction models limit the possibility of detecting subtle yet significant improvements. We set out to explore different machine learning methods with the purpose of mapping their predictions to the full 8 grade scale GOSE following TBI. The models were set up using the variables: age, GCS-motor score, pupillary reaction, and Marshall CT score. For model setup and internal validation, a total of 866 patients could be included. For external validation, a cohort of 369 patients were included from Leuven, Belgium, and a cohort of 573 patients from the US multi-center ProTECT III study. Our findings indicate that proportional odds logistic regression (POLR), random forest regression, and a neural network model achieved accuracy values of 0.3–0.35 when applied to internal data, compared to the random baseline which is 0.125 for eight categories. The models demonstrated satisfactory performance during external validation in the data from Leuven, however, their performance were not satisfactory when applied to the ProTECT III dataset.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2024. Vol. 14, no 1, article id 8036
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-527363DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58527-4ISI: 001197971100035PubMedID: 38580767Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85189808166OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-527363DiVA, id: diva2:1855054
Funder
Kjell and Marta Beijer FoundationUppsala University
Note

These authors contributed equally: A. Hånell and E. Rostami.

Available from: 2024-04-29 Created: 2024-04-29 Last updated: 2025-11-24Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Refining outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Refining outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of mortality and a major contributor to global disability-adjusted life years in young and middle-aged adults. While animal studies have shown potential, effective pharmacological treatments have failed to materialize in the clinical setting. A primary challenge in TBI research is the inherent heterogeneity of the condition.

Outcome prediction models can reduce this complexity by better risk stratification for clinical trials, optimizing resource allocation, and improving prognostic communication with patients and families. TBI outcomes are commonly measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE), an 8-point scale ranging from death (1) to upper good recovery (8). However, current prediction models typically dichotomize this scale into favorable/unfavorable outcomes which limits nuanced prognostication.

The primary objective of this thesis was to develop prediction models capable of predicting the full 8-grade GOSE. A secondary objective was to evaluate the integration of machine learning in clinical care, specifically assessing an AI decision support system for detecting intracranial hemorrhage in computed tomography (CT) scans.

We found that advanced machine learning methods performed comparably to standard statistical models when limited to admission variables. However, the incorporation of dynamic physiological data captured prognostic signals that static admission models missed, thereby improving prediction accuracy.

Regarding the AI diagnostic tool, while it successfully identified most hemorrhages, we observed no significant clinical benefit for the patients. This underscores that in clinical settings, the implementation strategy is as critical as the technology itself.

Finally, this thesis emphasizes that predictive models are not static tools. They are sensitive to temporal changes in populations and healthcare protocols. Therefore, future implementation must prioritize the continuous updating and validation of these models.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2025. p. 115
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 2217
Keywords
Traumatic brain injury, TBI, Acquired brain injury, Artificial Intelligence, Machine learning, prognosis, prognostic model, Neurosurgery, Neuroradiology.
National Category
Neurosciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-571980 (URN)978-91-513-2687-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2026-01-16, H:son-Holmdahlsalen, Dag Hammarskjölds Väg 8, Uppsala, 12:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-12-18 Created: 2025-11-24 Last updated: 2025-12-18

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3405 kB)184 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3405 kBChecksum SHA-512
8eb0b73bdbfa733d07fbb0106477a200e28fd05bc6dfc1ae439260e7a00b8365fcff0e2b4fc16db2c896e38ae3faa850743501e152990cd702b64635a52fc2a5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lewén, AndersEnblad, PerHånell, AndersRostami, Elham

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lewén, AndersEnblad, PerHånell, AndersRostami, Elham
By organisation
Neurosurgery
In the same journal
Scientific Reports
Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 185 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 189 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf