Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Swedish midwives' attitudes towards continuity models - a cross-sectional survey
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health Research. Mid Sweden Univ, Dept Nursing, Sundsvall 85170, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6985-6729
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5061-5597
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health Research. Sophiahemmet Univ Coll, Stockholm, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5160-8882
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0766-9957
2024 (English)In: Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare, ISSN 1877-5756, E-ISSN 1877-5764, Vol. 40, article id 100957Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Midwifery continuity models are growing worldwide, but few such alternatives are available in Sweden. There is sparse knowledge about Swedish midwives' attitudes about midwifery continuity models.

Aim: The aim of this study was to explore Swedish midwives' attitudes toward continuity models. An additional aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a previously developed instrument measuring attitudes to continuity models.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of a national sample of 2537 midwives in Sweden. The participants completed a questionnaire online. A Principal component Analysis was performed to identify components in the instrument.

Results: A fairly similar proportion of midwives worked in antenatal care (30.7%), intrapartum care (30.7%) and in other areas (31.1%). Many midwives (59%) agreed that continuity models should be available to women, but were not certain about if such models should be offered to all women or low risk women only. Two domains of the attitude scale were identified; Relationship-based Midwifery Continuity Models, and Practical and Organisational Aspects of Midwifery Continuity Models. Age, having children, marital status, length of work experience and place of work were associated with high agreement non the two components.

Conclusion: Many midwives in general held positive attitudes about continuity models. The relationship aspects were highly valued but midwives were also hesitant about the practical and organisational aspect of continuity models. Unbiased information to midwives about the pros and cons with continuity models should be offered, in order to limit misunderstandings about the model.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 40, article id 100957
Keywords [en]
Attitudes, Continuity models, Midwifery, Principal Component Analysis
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-528662DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2024.100957ISI: 001218629400001PubMedID: 38430672OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-528662DiVA, id: diva2:1862491
Available from: 2024-05-29 Created: 2024-05-29 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(401 kB)182 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 401 kBChecksum SHA-512
e62302c35620330e43eac1d8cecb71480534a08a4fd51c7d10e1b49207d4351217d913ea8958d69f94973f2f7581e9e0a1f6cabbf2588b0b329196d75e62a980
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Hildingsson, IngegerdFahlbeck, HannaLarsson, BirgittaJohansson, Margareta

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hildingsson, IngegerdFahlbeck, HannaLarsson, BirgittaJohansson, Margareta
By organisation
Obstetrics and Reproductive Health Research
In the same journal
Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive MedicineNursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 183 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 251 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf