Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Pharmacometric-Based Pharmacoeconomic Modeling in the Cost-Utility Evaluation of Sunitinib Therapy
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6594-9813
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1258-8297
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2979-679X
2024 (English)In: PharmacoEconomics (Auckland), ISSN 1170-7690, E-ISSN 1179-2027Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Background: Cost-utility analyses (CUAs) increasingly use models to predict long-term outcomes and translate trial data to real-world settings. Model structure uncertainty affects these predictions. This study compares pharmacometric against traditional pharmacoeconomic model evaluations for CUAs of sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

Methods: A two-arm trial comparing sunitinib 37.5 mg daily with no treatment was simulated using a pharmacometric-based pharmacoeconomic model framework. Overall, four existing models [time-to-event (TTE) and Markov models] were re-estimated to the survival data and linked to logistic regression models describing the toxicity data [neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome (HFS)] to create traditional pharmacoeconomic model frameworks. All five frameworks were used to simulate clinical outcomes and sunitinib treatment costs, including a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) scenario.

Results: The pharmacometric model framework predicted that sunitinib treatment costs an additional 142,756 euros per quality adjusted life year (QALY) compared with no treatment, with deviations - 21.2% (discrete Markov), - 15.1% (continuous Markov), + 7.2% (TTE Weibull), and + 39.6% (TTE exponential) from the traditional model frameworks. The pharmacometric framework captured the change in toxicity over treatment cycles (e.g., increased HFS incidence until cycle 4 with a decrease thereafter), a pattern not observed in the pharmacoeconomic frameworks (e.g., stable HFS incidence over all treatment cycles). Furthermore, the pharmacoeconomic frameworks excessively forecasted the percentage of patients encountering subtherapeutic concentrations of sunitinib over the course of time (pharmacoeconomic: 24.6% at cycle 2 to 98.7% at cycle 16, versus pharmacometric: 13.7% at cycle 2 to 34.1% at cycle 16).

Conclusions: Model structure significantly influences CUA predictions. The pharmacometric-based model framework more closely represented real-world toxicity trends and drug exposure changes. The relevance of these findings depends on the specific question a CUA seeks to address.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2024.
National Category
Pharmacology and Toxicology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-545158DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01438-zISI: 001321553500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85205035560OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-545158DiVA, id: diva2:1920695
Funder
Swedish Cancer Society, CAN 23 2921 PjSwedish Cancer Society, CAN 20 1226 PjFUppsala UniversityAvailable from: 2024-12-12 Created: 2024-12-12 Last updated: 2024-12-17

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1338 kB)29 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1338 kBChecksum SHA-512
2858f15837918b307465a08722a4bf088845470f7022565dfc680f458309acffbaa9683ee17aae10f73dd5a584fae4dfe2907a3fc053d0d74b9d081f6bc7e0df
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Centanni, MaddalenaKarlsson, Mats O.Friberg, Lena E.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Centanni, MaddalenaKarlsson, Mats O.Friberg, Lena E.
By organisation
Department of Pharmacy
In the same journal
PharmacoEconomics (Auckland)
Pharmacology and Toxicology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 29 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 130 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf