Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Parents’ experiences of fear of childbirth in relation to support needs, self-efficacy and mental health
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health Research. Uppsala University, WoMHeR (Centre for Women’s Mental Health during the Reproductive Lifespan).ORCID iD: 0009-0009-4169-5914
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Description
Abstract [en]

Childbirth can be associated with both positive and negative psychological reactions. Pregnancy and birth and the emotions connected to it are subjective, multidimensional and complex, including both physiological and psychological factors. Fear of childbirth (FOC) represents a significant psychological challenge for both expectant mothers and fathers, with implications for mental health, self-efficacy, and support needs. FOC during pregnancy can lead to various psychiatric disorders, such as postpartum depression and anxiety disorders as well as an increase in instrumental births and emergency caesarean sections. The overall aim of this thesis was to identify the needs and preferences of prospective and newly become parents experiencing FOC and what kinds of barriers and facilitators there are in help-seeking. The work is summarized in four papers originating from a cross-sectional study and interviews with men and women with FOC. Paper I explores the experiences of Swedish pregnant women with severe FOC, highlighting unmet support needs and barriers to seeking help. Paper II employs cluster analysis to examine the relationships between FOC, anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy in pregnant women. Paper III turns its focus to fathers, examining their support needs, barriers, and facilitators related to FOC. Paper IV describes and analyses women’s expectations of childbirth, their needs and wishes for support and treatment for FOC during pregnancy. Results from Paper I showed that women identified stigma, lack of empathetic healthcare encounters, and logistical obstacles as primary deterrents to accessing care. Despite many participants desiring support, only a small group of women found the available support effective. Respectful, individualized care was a critical facilitator of positive outcomes. Paper II identified four clusters: Resourceful–Robust, Resourceful–Fearful, Vulnerable–Fearful, and Fragile–Fearful. Women in the Vulnerable–Fearful and Fragile–Fearful clusters showed the highest levels of anxiety and depression, coupled with the lowest self-efficacy. Paper III reported that fathers experienced anxiety, stress, and a lack of recognition for their emotional needs within the maternal-focused healthcare system. The stigma of expressing vulnerability, compounded by societal expectations of stoicism, often deterred men from seeking help. Individualized support and proactive engagement from healthcare providers were identified as critical to addressing these issues. Paper IV showed that the women had FOC long before their first pregnancy. The women’s fear was to a very small degree about actual risks of injury, illness and death. Instead, they were afraid of being stripped of control over themselves and the situation, not being treated respectfully, being abandoned and the risk of medical procedures being performed without their consent. In summary, FOC is closely tied to mental health, self-efficacy, and the quality of available support systems. Women and men experience FOC differently, necessitating gender-sensitive approaches in childbirth and postpartum care. The results suggest that providing empathetic and individualized care, and addressing systemic barriers, may reduce FOC and improve perinatal outcomes. The findings underscore the need for tailored interventions, particularly for those with heightened vulnerability to mental health challenges.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2025. , p. 66
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 2118
Keywords [en]
Anxiety, barriers, birth, cluster analysis, counselling, depression, experiences, facilitators, fathers, FOBS, FOC, maternity care, mental health, mixed method, support preferences, pregnancy, self-efficacy, women
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-548541ISBN: 978-91-513-2363-3 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-548541DiVA, id: diva2:1931310
Public defence
2025-03-14, Rum IX, Universitetshuset, Biskopsgatan 3, Uppsala, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-02-21 Created: 2025-01-27 Last updated: 2025-02-21
List of papers
1. Preferences of support and barriers and facilitators to help-seeking in pregnant women with severe fear of childbirth in Sweden: a mixed-method study
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Preferences of support and barriers and facilitators to help-seeking in pregnant women with severe fear of childbirth in Sweden: a mixed-method study
Show others...
2024 (English)In: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, E-ISSN 1471-2393, Vol. 24, no 1, article id 388Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

There are few support interventions for women with fear of childbirth tailored towards type of fears and parity. To inform the future development of an acceptable and relevant intervention for women with severe fear of childbirth, primary objectives were to examine: (1) pregnant women’s experiences of and preferences for support and (2) barriers and facilitators to help-seeking. Secondary objectives were to examine if there are any differences based on pregnant women’s parity.

Methods

Pregnant women with a severe fear of childbirth in Sweden completed an online cross-sectional survey between February and September 2022. Severe fear of childbirth was measured using the fear of childbirth scale. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics and free answers were analysed using manifest content analysis. A contiguous approach to integration was adopted with qualitative and quantitative findings reported separately.

Results

In total, 609 participants, 364 nulliparous and 245 parous women, had severe fear of childbirth. The main category “A twisting road to walk towards receiving support for fear of childbirth” was explored and described by the generic categories: Longing for support, Struggling to ask for support, and Facilitating aspects of seeking support. Over half (63.5%), of pregnant women without planned or ongoing treatment, wanted support for fear of childbirth. Most (60.2%) pregnant women with ongoing or completed fear of childbirth treatment regarded the treatment as less helpful or not at all helpful. If fear of childbirth treatment was not planned, 35.8% of women would have liked to have received treatment. Barriers to help seeking included stigma surrounding fear of childbirth, previous negative experiences with healthcare contacts, fear of not being believed, fear of not being listened to, and discomfort of having to face their fears. Facilitators to help seeking included receiving respectful professional support that was easily available, flexible, and close to home.

Conclusions

Most pregnant women with severe fear of childbirth felt unsupported during pregnancy. Findings emphasise the need to develop individual and easily accessible psychological support for women with severe fear of childbirth, delivered by trained professionals with an empathetic and respectful attitude.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2024
Keywords
Barriers, Counselling, Facilitators, Fear of childbirth, FOBS, Mixed-method, Pregnancy, Support preferences, Women
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Research subject
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-529590 (URN)10.1186/s12884-024-06580-2 (DOI)001232312600002 ()38796427 (PubMedID)
Funder
Uppsala University
Available from: 2024-05-29 Created: 2024-05-29 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved
2. Cluster Analysis of Fear of Childbirth, Anxiety, Depression, and Childbirth Self-Efficacy
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Cluster Analysis of Fear of Childbirth, Anxiety, Depression, and Childbirth Self-Efficacy
2024 (English)In: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, ISSN 0884-2175, E-ISSN 1552-6909, Vol. 53, no 5, p. 522-533Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To identify clusters of women based on anxiety, depression, fear of birth, and childbirth self-efficacy and factors associated with the clusters.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Setting: Online in Sweden.

Participants: Pregnant women (N = 1,419).

Methods: We collected data through online questionnaires. We included scales to measure anxiety, depression, worries about and fear of birth, and self-efficacy in a kappa-means cluster analysis. We calculated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals between clusters and background variables.

Results: We identified 4 clusters based on severity: Resourceful-Robust, Resourceful-Fearful, Vulnerable-Fearful, and Fragile-Fearful. Participants in the Resourceful-Fearful and Vulnerable-Fearful clusters were more likely to report mental health problems than those in the Resourceful-Robust cluster. Participants in the Vulnerable-Fearful and Fragile-Fearful clusters were more likely to report mental health problems than those in the Resourceful-Robust cluster. Participants in the Fragile-Fearful cluster were more likely to be multiparous, report that their pregnancy was not normal, and prefer cesarean birth than those in the Resourceful-Robust cluster.

Conclusions: Women with childbirth fear may be vulnerable to anxiety and depression during the perinatal period, although the severity might vary. Self-efficacy might be a mediator against mental health problems. Findings demonstrated levels of severity, and the one-size-fits-all approach in Swedish health care may benefit from a more targeted approach for women with fear of childbirth.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2024
Keywords
anxiety, childbirth fear, cluster analysis, depression, self-efficacy, women
National Category
Nursing Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-539399 (URN)10.1016/j.jogn.2024.04.004 (DOI)001315494200001 ()38782047 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2024-11-01 Created: 2024-11-01 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved
3. Support Needs, Barriers, and Facilitators for Fathers With Fear of Childbirth in Sweden: A Mixed-Method Study
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Support Needs, Barriers, and Facilitators for Fathers With Fear of Childbirth in Sweden: A Mixed-Method Study
2024 (English)In: American Journal of Men's Health, ISSN 1557-9883, E-ISSN 1557-9891, Vol. 18, no 5Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of this mixed-method study was to identify support needs, as well as barriers and facilitators to seeking support in a sample of Swedish fathers with a fear of childbirth (FOC). Participants completed an anonymous quantitative online survey (N = 131), with three free-text items for those self-identifying as having an FOC (N = 71) and five individual in-depth interviews. Data analysis included descriptive and chi-square analyses for quantitative data, and manifest content analysis for qualitative data. Those with a severe FOC were more likely to report having on-going mental health difficulties (p = .039) and one fifth (21%) of the participants with severe FOC wanted to receive professional treatment, but only 8.1% received treatment. Most participants either preferred individual support or to receive support together with their partner. Fathers with severe FOC were more likely to report one or more barriers than those without FOC (p = .005), where unwanted social stigma was the single largest barrier. Qualitative findings identified one main category: Expectant fathers missing and wishing for support for FOC composed four generic categories: (1) support in developing an understanding of their fear, (2) coping by being aware of feelings, (3) professional support through trust and respect, and (4) needing individualized support. To encourage healthy fathers, clinical professionals should find ways to support fathers, such as by providing them with their own perinatal appointments, asking them about their feelings, as well as screening, diagnosing, and treating fathers with severe FOC.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2024
Keywords
barriers, facilitators, fathers, fear of childbirth, FOBS
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-540928 (URN)10.1177/15579883241272057 (DOI)001313749600001 ()39268989 (PubMedID)
Available from: 2024-10-24 Created: 2024-10-24 Last updated: 2025-01-27Bibliographically approved
4. Women with primary fear of childbirth and their expectations of childbirth, needs and wishes for support for fear of childbirth during pregnancy – a qualitative study
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Women with primary fear of childbirth and their expectations of childbirth, needs and wishes for support for fear of childbirth during pregnancy – a qualitative study
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Keywords
Birth, FOC, Maternity care, Pregnancy, Support, Women´s experience
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-548540 (URN)
Available from: 2025-01-27 Created: 2025-01-27 Last updated: 2025-02-11

Open Access in DiVA

UUThesis_C-Nordin-Remberger-2025(722 kB)74 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 722 kBChecksum SHA-512
37625aefab0adbfe19b2a5b220ea7f6e57b48c3637c4b38e5ce52b3339d9566d54c2127d5180ecefc0f3ba4a13879054f116f26e211dd860d07feaf103d1fed4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Nordin-Remberger, Carita

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordin-Remberger, Carita
By organisation
Obstetrics and Reproductive Health ResearchWoMHeR (Centre for Women’s Mental Health during the Reproductive Lifespan)
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive MedicineMedical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 74 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 706 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf