Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Role of Non-homologous End Joining in the Repair of Different Types of DNA Double-Strand Breaks
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology. (Bo Stenerlöw)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9916-6673
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology.
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Anticancer agents kill cancer cells by inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs vary in type and complexity, posing different challenges to repair mechanisms. The primary DSB repair pathway is non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). However, NHEJ response to different types and complexity of DSB remains elusive. Here we examined agents which produce DSB and varying ratios of single-strand breaks (SSB) and base damage, calicheamicin, X-rays, phleomycin, etoposide, and temozolomide in wild-type cells and cells with knock-outs (KO) of DNA-PKcs or XRCC4 and analyzed clonogenicity, induction of prompt DSB, non-DSB clusters and DSB repair kinetics. In wild-type cells, DSB were repaired by both fast and slow repair kinetics. However, in the absence of NHEJ there was essentially only a fast repair phase (30-60 min), whereafter there was no repair the following 1-24 hours. Treatment with X-rays and calicheamicin resulted in only 20% repair in the NHEJ defective cells, whereas 40-50%, and 10-20% of DSB were repaired after treatment with phleomycin and etoposide, respectively. Ttemozolomide did not induce prompt DSB. The anticancer agent temozolomide, which do not induce prompt DSB, reduced cell survival in a dose-dependent manner but independent of NHEJ status. Non-DSB clusters, e.g., combination of two or more oxidized bases, single-strand breaks or other DNA lesion that do not form a prompt DSB, increased as the DSB:SSB ratio decreased from calicheamicin, to X-rays, phleomycin, etoposide, and temozolomide, respectively. Notably, removal of non-DSB clusters occurred rapidly, independent of NHEJ. Although the NHEJ defective cells were hypersensitive to all agents, except temozolomide, the cell survival did not directly correlate to the capacity of NHEJ defective cell to repair DSB, suggesting that the role of NHEJ-independent repair pathways vary for DSB of different types or complexity. Overall, DSB type/complexity clearly affects the repair efficiency. These insights could be vital for understanding the choice of DSB repair pathway and optimization of DNA repair modulation. 

Keywords [en]
DSB complexity, DSB repair, NHEJ, DNA-PKcs, XRCC4 KO, HCT116 cells
National Category
Basic Cancer Research
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-553098OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-553098DiVA, id: diva2:1946731
Available from: 2025-03-23 Created: 2025-03-23 Last updated: 2025-03-23
In thesis
1. Breaking to Understand: DNA Repair in Response to Cancer Therapy
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Breaking to Understand: DNA Repair in Response to Cancer Therapy
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Human DNA constantly faces endogenous and exogenous damage, with DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) posing the greatest threat to genome integrity. However, DSBs can be leveraged to kill cancer cells, as many treatments act as DSB inducers. The dominant repair pathway, non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), resolves the majority of DSBs. This thesis explores strategies to sensitize resistant cancer cells through combination therapy and investigates NHEJ’s response to varying DSB complexities.

Paper I addresses cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer. We found that combining cisplatin with the HSP90 inhibitor onalespib enhances sensitivity by increasing DSB levels, inducing apoptosis, and causing G2/M arrest, making it a promising strategy. Paper II focuses on glioblastoma (GBM), an aggressive brain tumor with limited treatment options. We demonstrated that onalespib enhances radiosensitivity in 2D and 3D GBM models by increasing DSB levels, promoting apoptosis, and altering protein expression, suggesting that HSP90 inhibition could improve radiotherapy outcomes. Paper III investigates the alpha emitter Ra-223, used in bone-metastatic prostate cancer. Our findings revealed that Ra-223 generates clustered DSBs, triggering NHEJ activation, growth inhibition, and apoptosis in prostate cancer cells, with no detectable cellular uptake. Paper IV explores pharmacological ascorbate (Asc) effect on NHEJ pathway. We found that Asc induces delayed DSBs, extensive pan-nuclear γH2AX formation, necrosis, and G2/M arrest in colorectal cancer cells, with stronger effects in XRCC4 KO cells. We concluded that Asc does not generate prompt DSBs, and the delayed DSBs are linked to necrotic nuclear degradation, with sensitivity influenced by cell cycle regulation rather than NHEJ deficiency. Paper V examines NHEJ’s role in repairing DSBs of varying complexity in colorectal cancer cells. Wild-type cells exhibited both fast and slow repair kinetics, while NHEJ-deficient cells showed only a fast repair phase, followed by repair failure. Non-DSB clusters increased as the DSB:SSB ratio decreased (from calicheamicin to X-rays, bleomycin, etoposide, and temozolomide). These clusters were rapidly removed, independent of NHEJ, highlighting the impact of DSB type/complexity on repair efficiency.

In conclusion, this thesis presents strategies to overcome cisplatin resistance, enhance radiosensitivity in GBM, and elucidate Ra-223 toxicity mechanisms in prostate cancer. It also examines Asc’s effects on DSB induction and repair and reveals NHEJ’s role in processing complex DSBs. Our findings provide new insights into optimizing DSB repair and therapeutic strategies in cancer treatment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2025. p. 88
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 2141
Keywords
DSB, NHEJ, HSP90 inhibition, X-ray, alpha-particle, clustered DSB, ascorbate, XRCC4, DNA-PKcs, DSB complexity
National Category
Basic Cancer Research
Research subject
Medical Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-553099 (URN)978-91-513-2446-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-05-15, Rudbecksalen, Rudbeck laboratory, Dag Hammarskjölds Väg 20, Uppsala, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-04-22 Created: 2025-03-23 Last updated: 2025-04-22

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hariri, Mehran
By organisation
Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology
Basic Cancer Research

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 34 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf