There are two especially important problems surrounding agential causation in the Iliad: first, whether divine causation or motivation behind human actions and thoughts undermines human agency, and, second, whether the causation or motivation of psychic organs undermines the agency of the unified self. In this essay, I first defend an interpretation according to which a solution commonly applied to the first problem—“double determination”—can be seen as relevant also for the second one. Second, I sketch a proposal for how psychological indeterminacy can be integrated into a constructive account of Iliadic ethics. On this proposal, a certain flexibility vis-à-vis agency can be considered an ethically constructive attitude.