Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Moral distress, moral residue, and associations with psychological distress: a cross-sectional study
Karolinska Inst, Dept Global Publ Hlth, Global Disaster Med Hlth Needs & Response, Tomtebodavagen 18, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.;Karolinska Inst, Dept Global Publ Hlth, Equ & Hlth Policy EHP, Stockholm, Sweden..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics. Karolinska Inst, Stockholm Ctr Healthcare Ethics CHE, Dept Learning Informat Management & Ethics LIME, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1339-4956
Karolinska Inst, Dept Global Publ Hlth, Global Disaster Med Hlth Needs & Response, Tomtebodavagen 18, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, research centers etc., National Centre for Disaster Psychiatry. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1317-2093
2025 (English)In: European Journal of Psychotraumatology, ISSN 2000-8198, E-ISSN 2000-8066, Vol. 16, no 1, article id 2512677Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The consequences of moral challenges among healthcare workers (HCWs) have been increasingly recognized. To date, however, there is limited knowledge about the predictors of and associations between moral distress, moral residue, and other psychological consequences among HCWs working in a pandemic context.

Objective: We aimed to assess the levels of, and the associations between HCWs’ experiences of moral distress and moral residue with traumatic stress, burnout, and general psychological distress, and evaluate the role of empathic and compassion aspects for these outcomes, while adjusting for demographic and professional factors.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of 6551 Swedish HCWs participating in a survey during the COVID-19 pandemic, in the autumn of 2020. The survey included questions related to moral challenges, moral distress and residue, and self-report scales for general psychological distress (GHQ-5), traumatic stress (ITQ), compassion satisfaction and fatigue (ProQoL), empathic ability (B-IRI), and burnout (SMBQ).

Results: There were strong associations between moral challenges and moral distress and residue. There were also clear associations between moral distress and residue and psychological distress scales. Empathic ability, compassion fatigue, and compassion satisfaction were associated with moral residue whereas compassion satisfaction was not associated with moral distress. Demographic and professional predictors included gender, age, and occupational role. No interactions between moral challenges and empathic ability were found for moral distress or residue.

Discussion/conclusion: Moral distress and moral residue share some variance with both general and stress-related psychological distress; however, moral distress and residue are both theoretically and empirically distinct outcomes of moral challenges as compared to other established psychological consequences of occupational stress. Empathic ability was associated with moral distress, but not with moral residue. Moving forward, longitudinal research is needed to better understand the interplay among moral aspects relevant to HCWs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2025. Vol. 16, no 1, article id 2512677
Keywords [en]
Moral stress, moral distress, moral residue, moral challenges, health care workers, COVID-19 pandemic, psychological distress, burnout, traumatic stress, empathic ability, Estr & eacute, s moral, distr & eacute, huellas morales, COVID-19, desaf & iacute, os morales, trabajadores de la salud, malestar psicol & oacute, gico, s traum & aacute, tico, capacidad emp & aacute, tica
National Category
Medical Ethics Psychology (Excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-562230DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2512677ISI: 001511911600001PubMedID: 40534481Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105008526358OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-562230DiVA, id: diva2:1979315
Funder
Karolinska InstituteAvailable from: 2025-06-30 Created: 2025-06-30 Last updated: 2025-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1236 kB)215 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1236 kBChecksum SHA-512
b35c42a468df60660457d57b2fedeb21fae625635b628e504775cfa3bc0a254ed17febaddbd05375a5ed4c2fdb2896f25f3040300463653abe4980c47c642dce
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Juth, NiklasArnberg, Filip

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Juth, NiklasArnberg, Filip
By organisation
Centre for Research Ethics and BioethicsNational Centre for Disaster PsychiatryDepartment of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Medical EthicsPsychology (Excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 215 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 268 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf