Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Applicability of the European Association of Urology 2021 Prognostic Model for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer in a Swedish Population-based Cohort
Lund Univ, Dept Translat Med, Malmö, Sweden.;Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Malmö, Sweden..
Lund Univ, Dept Translat Med, Malmö, Sweden..
Antoni Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Surg Oncol Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands.;Vrije Univ, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands..
Linköping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Div Urol, Linköping, Sweden..
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: European Urology Open Science, ISSN 2666-1691, E-ISSN 2666-1683, Vol. 80, p. 33-37Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The European Association of Urology (EAU) 2021 prognostic model for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is based on the World Health Organization (WHO) 1973 and/or WHO 2004/2022 grading systems for patients who did not receive bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillations and is widely used to assess the risk of progression. The estimated risk of progression affects the type of adjuvant intravesical instillation (chemotherapy or BCG), with primary radical cystectomy recommended for patients with the highest risk of progression. We applied the EAU 2021 prognostic model in a population-based setting for 3392 patients with primary NMIBC diagnosed in 2013–2014 according to the BladderBaSe 2.0 database. We assessed the model calibration by comparing the 5-yr progression probability observed in our cohort with the predicted progression probability assigned for the risk groups in the original EAU study, and evaluated the discrimination according to Harrell’s C index. At 5-yr follow-up, 394 patients had experienced disease progression. The progression probability observed was 4.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5–6.3%), 8.6% (95% CI 6.9–10%), 25% (95% CI 22–28%), and 23% (95% CI 14–30%) for the low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups, respectively. The discrimination at 5 yr was 0.72 (95% CI 0.69–0.78) for the overall cohort and 0.74 (95% CI 0.70–0.80) in the group excluding the 811 patients who received BCG instillations. Showing moderate predictive ability, the EAU 2021 prognostic model has clinical utility in population-based settings despite underestimation of the observed progression risk in the low- and high-risk groups in the current study.

Patient summary

We looked at how well a model predicted the risk of progression of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer using results for a group of Swedish patients. Approximately one in four patients in the high-risk category progress to more advanced disease within 5 yr. Doctors and patients need to consider the probability of progression in the high-risk category when making shared decisions on which treatment is best for an individual patient.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 80, p. 33-37
Keywords [en]
Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, Adjuvant treatment, Primary radical cystectomy, Progression risk, Prognostic mode
National Category
Urology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-568397DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.08.003ISI: 001566883000001PubMedID: 40979267Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105014824192OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-568397DiVA, id: diva2:2003951
Funder
Swedish Cancer Society, CAN 2022/1971Swedish Cancer Society, 2023/2807Swedish Research Council, 2021-00859Available from: 2025-10-06 Created: 2025-10-06 Last updated: 2025-10-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(780 kB)131 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 780 kBChecksum SHA-512
6ca2bbfd4e99dcd01bfffb69dfdd527724089ae75d76e4e010b78d8f059ee1e76cc98e36b7e83ddcb056bca7ad83812597b8c18ad13cdde1129131c91e6aa725
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Malmström, Per-UnoHolmberg, LarsHäggström, Christel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Malmström, Per-UnoHolmberg, LarsHäggström, Christel
By organisation
UrologyEndocrine Surgery
In the same journal
European Urology Open Science
Urology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 1240 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf