Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The politics of gatekeeping: respondents as gatekeepers and gatekeepers as respondents
Manipal Acad Higher Educ, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, G04 Acad City Dubai, Dubai, U Arab Emirates..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1962-410x
2025 (English)In: Qualitative Research, ISSN 1468-7941, E-ISSN 1741-3109, Vol. 25, no 5, p. 1154-1163Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The important role of gatekeepers in accessing and negotiating the field has been well established. In this research note, we highlight an underexplored dimension of gatekeeping in relation to our fieldwork on the Kalbeliya community of Rajasthan in India. Existing scholarship on the Kalbeliyas has mainly focused on the politics of heritage recognition of Kalbeliya dance of India, which was recognized as Intangible Cultural Heritage by UNESCO in 2010. Nonetheless, no significant research exists on the methodological challenges encountered in this field. Our navigations in the field uncovered an aspect deeply embedded in arguably, the multi-layered nature of gatekeeping - the blurred boundaries and shifting positionalities between gatekeepers and respondents, with respondents acting as gatekeepers and gatekeepers as respondents. In this research, key respondents were Kalbeliya women dancers and other respondents included state officials, Manganiyars and Kalbeliya men, who acted as gatekeepers in accessing Kalbeliya dancers. These shifting positionalities also exposed their gendered power dynamics, which shaped our methodological navigations in the field.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2025. Vol. 25, no 5, p. 1154-1163
Keywords [en]
state, gatekeeping, caste, heritage, Kalbeliya
National Category
Political Science (Excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-577862DOI: 10.1177/14687941241306417ISI: 001379497900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85212707127OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-577862DiVA, id: diva2:2033852
Available from: 2026-01-30 Created: 2026-01-30 Last updated: 2026-01-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Thapar-Björkert, Suruchi

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Thapar-Björkert, Suruchi
By organisation
Department of Government
In the same journal
Qualitative Research
Political Science (Excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 10 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf