Overview of approved COVID-19 vaccines in the EU, recommendations for use in Sweden and vaccine uptake over time: Report from the Swedish Medical Products Agency and the Public Health Agency of SwedenShow others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, ISSN 0300-9734, E-ISSN 2000-1967, Vol. 130, article id e12937Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Objective: The aim of this review is to describe the regulatory background of the COVID-19 vaccines, the national recommendations for use issued and vaccine uptake in Sweden. It includes an overview of licensing and relevant safety aspects identified by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the national vaccination plan issued by the Public Health Agency (PHA) of Sweden.
Materials and methods: Information on dates of licensing and safety aspects of importance identified by EMA published on its website, was compiled and presented in a chronological order. National recommendations on COVID-19-vaccination and vaccinations-data on uptake and coverage using the national-vaccine-register are presented.
Results: COVID-19 vaccines development, assessments using rolling review and licensing of the covid-19 vaccines was done in 2020 during less than a year. Large-scale production was implemented. Monthly safety reviews performed by the EMA identified risk for thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome with adenoviral vaccines and myocarditis for mRNA vaccines which led to restrictions in national recommendations for specified groups. National vaccinations were launched in a phased manner during 2021. Persons of high age, risk groups and nursing home personnel were prioritised during primary vaccinations and for initial boosters. In the Swedish population, 85% recieved at least one vaccine dose from the age of 12. At least two doses were recieved by 81% from age 18 and 95% from age 80.
Conclusion: Recommendations for national use adhered to relevant adverse drug reactions identified. The vaccine coverage was high. Timelines presented should be considered in follow-up studies of COVID-19-vaccines to manage possible selection bias and confounding.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Upsala Medical Society, 2025. Vol. 130, article id e12937
Keywords [en]
COVID-19 vaccines, safety, adverse drug reactions, epidemiology, public health
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine Infectious Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-578279DOI: 10.48101/ujms.v130.12937ISI: 001667230200001PubMedID: 41189699OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-578279DiVA, id: diva2:2034886
2026-02-032026-02-032026-02-03Bibliographically approved