CAvent: A Multicenter Observational Study on Manual Ventilation Parameters During Advanced Life Support in Cardiac ArrestShow others and affiliations
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]
Background
Despite the critical role of ventilation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, scientific understanding of manual ventilation parameters during cardiac arrest is limited, with current cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines largely based on expert opinion rather than robust clinical evidence. The aim of this study was to present an extensive description of ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and ventilation parameters such as volume, pressure and frequency and compare them across different ventilation modes and airway modalities.
Methods
The Cardiac Arrest ventilation study (CAvent) was a multicenter, observational cohort study conducted in both nurse- and physician-staffed advanced life support settings. Key ventilation parameters—such as pressure, volume, and frequency—were captured using a portable pneumotachograph and capnography device.
Results
The analysis included 28120 ventilations across 311 separate ventilation periods in 241 individual patients, of which 134 received asynchronous ventilations, 86 synchronous and 21 a mix of both. Endotracheal tube was the most frequently used airway modality, used in 58% of the cases. In asynchronous and synchronous ventilation, inspiratory tidal volume, expiratory tidal volume, peak inspiratory pressure and ventilation frequency [DS1] [DS2] was 407 vs. 423 ml, 384 vs. 356 ml, 48.1 vs. 32. 4 and 11.2 vs 5.0 respectively. Bag-valve-mask had the lowest effective lung ventilation and endotracheal tube during asynchronous ventilation had the highest peak inspiratory pressure.
Conclusion
ALS-provided manual ventilation during CPR varies greatly across ventilation modes and airway modalities. The ventilation frequency was higher in asynchronous ventilation while inspiratory tidal volumes did not differ between ventilation modes or modalities. Asynchronous ventilation with an endotracheal tube resulted in the highest peak inspiratory pressure and Bag-valve-mask ventilations in the lowest effective lung ventilation.
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Research subject
Medical Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-581627OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-581627DiVA, id: diva2:2043882
2026-03-062026-03-062026-03-16
In thesis