Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Use of ambient AI scribe in physicians' clinical documentation: a protocol for a systematic review on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0137-3434
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0908-6173
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6839-3651
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 16, no 4, article id e115562Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

INTRODUCTION: Clinical documentation is a significant driver of burnout among physicians. Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes, which leverage generative large language models to automate the creation of clinical notes from patient-physician conversations, are rapidly emerging as a potential solution. While these tools promise to enhance efficiency and reduce administrative tasks, concerns about the quality, accuracy and potential biases persist. There is now a need for a systematic synthesis of evidence to evaluate the impact of these technologies in clinical practice. To assess the effects of ambient AI scribes on physicians' clinical documentation, the specific objectives are to: (1) evaluate the effectiveness of these tools on documentation, including accuracy and completeness; (2) synthesise evidence on the impact on physician efficiency after adoption, including time spent on documentation and (3) examine physicians' satisfaction with these tools, including physicians' perceived burden.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review of quantitative or mixed-method studies as well as preprints will be conducted. We will perform a comprehensive search of four electronic databases (PubMed, IEEE Xplore, APA PsycInfo and Web of Science, along with medRix and ClinicalTrials.gov for preprints) for empirical studies published between January 2023 and March 2026. The review will synthesise studies comparing physicians' use of ambient AI scribes with traditional documentation approaches. Given the anticipated heterogeneity of the studies, a narrative synthesis will be employed to summarise the findings. Where common quantitative outcomes exist, effect sizes will be calculated using Hedges' g, mean differences or risk ratios/odds ratios as appropriate. The overall quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As no patient data are involved in the data collection, no ethical approval is acquired. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed, open-access journal, and presented at relevant academic conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251149086.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2026. Vol. 16, no 4, article id e115562
Keywords [en]
Artificial Intelligence, Electronic Health Records, Health informatics, Physicians, Systematic Review
National Category
Medical Informatics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-583821DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115562ISI: 001734002500001PubMedID: 41927296Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105034956745OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-583821DiVA, id: diva2:2050850
Available from: 2026-04-07 Created: 2026-04-07 Last updated: 2026-04-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(362 kB)226 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 362 kBChecksum SHA-512
9423748fbcc44b8645f5f1d0d8ca2b063e445bf8a1899108663d1f2fba98ceee95cb17f703783530496a133d4260b759f4de3c53f3e97ac521bbfa7e26e5fa9a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Garcia Sanchez, CarolinaKharko, AnnaHägglund, MariaHagström, JosefinBlease, Charlotte

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Garcia Sanchez, CarolinaKharko, AnnaHägglund, MariaHagström, JosefinBlease, Charlotte
By organisation
Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Medical Informatics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 101 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf