Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

The role of primary tumour resection (PTR) in metastatic small intestinal (SiNETs) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) remains debated. While retrospective studies suggest improved survival and possible reduction of local complications, the evidence is limited by heterogeneity, selection bias, and an absence of prospective validation. Under the auspices of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Advisory Board, this position paper summarises current knowledge and expert consensus on the rationale, potential benefits, patient selection, timing, integration with systemic therapies, and future perspectives for PTR. PTR may be considered in selected patients with liver-limited or liver-dominant disease, indolent tumour biology, and good performance status, especially to prevent obstruction, bleeding, or ischaemia, to reduce symptomatic tumour burden, or to facilitate systemic and liver-directed therapies. However, the risks of major surgery, including intestinal and pancreatic resections, with long-term impact on digestion and nutrition, must be carefully considered. Decisions should be made in dedicated multidisciplinary tumour boards. Future directions include incorporation of molecular biomarkers, functional imaging, tumour growth rate, radiomics, and real-world data to refine patient selection. Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes remain underexplored and should be co-primary endpoints in prospective studies. PTR should not currently be regarded as standard of care for all cases but may have a role in carefully selected patients within integrated and individualised management strategies.