Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Scientific Literacy in Teacher Education: A Comparative Study of Science Teacher Education Curricula in Türkiye and Sweden
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Education.ORCID iD: 0009-0001-3210-6331
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Education.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8036-6245
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Education.
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Scientific literacy (SL) is a widely recognized goal of science education, yet its meaning and purpose are interpreted differently across contexts. This study compares how SL is conceptualized and related to future teaching in elementary science teacher education curricula in Türkiye and Sweden. A pragmatic discourse analysis was conducted on national guidelines and university curriculum documents. The analysis reveals two distinct discourses: the Disciplinary discourse, dominant in the Turkish documents, and the Integrative discourse, foregrounded in the Swedish documents. The Disciplinary discourse presents SL as an explicit and separate body of knowledge, emphasizing subject mastery and preparing pre-service teachers to teach this knowledge. In contrast, the Integrative discourse frames SL as embedded in teaching practices that connect science with sustainability, democracy, and critical engagement with socioscientific issues. The comparison underscores how curriculum and teaching traditions and policy frameworks guide teacher education.

National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-585452OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-585452DiVA, id: diva2:2057904
Available from: 2026-05-06 Created: 2026-05-06 Last updated: 2026-05-11
In thesis
1. Why Teach Science?: Scientific Literacy in Teacher Education from a Comparative Perspective
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Why Teach Science?: Scientific Literacy in Teacher Education from a Comparative Perspective
2026 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis investigates how scientific literacy is constituted in elementary science teacher education by examining the perspectives of pre-service science teachers and official teacher education documents, including comparative perspectives. Framed within a sociocultural and comparative didactic perspective, the thesis explores how conceptions of scientific literacy are situated within different educational traditions, curriculum structures, and broader contexts in Sweden and Türkiye. The overarching aim is to understand how scientific literacy is conceptualized, constituted, perceived, and interpreted in science teacher education, and the possible implications of these meanings for future science teaching. The thesis consists of three empirical studies. The first study explored Swedish pre-service science teachers’ perspectives on scientific literacy and their explanations of what, how, and why they plan to teach in the future. The results indicated that while pre-service teachers expressed an interest in science or teaching, their perspectives were often grounded in content or everyday encounters rather than in engagement with societal issues. The second study compared pre-service science teachers’ perspectives on scientific literacy in Sweden and Türkiye. Across both contexts, participants privileged correct explanations and everyday applications of scientific knowledge, whereas socio-scientific issues and scientific engagement were virtually ignored. While pre-service teachers from both countries problematized their teacher education, they did so through distinct lenses. The third study focused on science teacher education policy documents in both countries and revealed two dominant discourses: a disciplinary discourse, dominant in Türkiye, framing scientific literacy as a body of knowledge to be constructed; and an integrative discourse, dominant in Sweden, positioning scientific literacy as a way of connecting science to democracy, sustainability, and everyday life. The findings of the three articles also showed that what pre-service science teachers wished to learn during teacher education did not always align with what was stated in the official documents regarding the curricula and teacher education program descriptions in both countries. Through a comparative didactic approach, this thesis contributes conceptually and empirically to understanding how scientific literacy is context dependent. The thesis includes both practical and theoretical implications. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2026. p. 126
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Educational Sciences ; 42
Keywords
scientific literacy, pre-service teacher, science education, teacher education, curriculum, perspectives
National Category
Didactics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-585562 (URN)978-91-513-2873-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2026-08-28, Eva Netzelius-salen, Blåsenhusvon, Kraemers allé 1, Uppsala, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2026-06-01 Created: 2026-05-06 Last updated: 2026-06-01

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Ates, Kardelen AzraLundqvist, EvaAlmqvist, Jonas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ates, Kardelen AzraLundqvist, EvaAlmqvist, Jonas
By organisation
Department of Education
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf