Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The dialectics of labour segmentation in the Swedish gig economy
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Human Geography.ORCID iD: 0009-0003-6858-871X
2026 (English)In: Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, ISSN 0435-3684, E-ISSN 1468-0467, p. 1-18Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Flexibility is the defining promise of the gig economy, yet also its central contradiction. Often framed as a benefit, flexibility operates dialectically, as both a mechanism of control and a potential site of agency. Workers’ ability to navigate or resist precarity is shaped by their position within segmented labour markets, their subjectivities, and broader socio-economic structures. The gig economy is not a single labour market, then, but a stratified one in which conditions vary drastically across sectors and worker groups. This paper examines two differently situated workers in distinct segments of gig work to explore the determinants of precarity. It identifies three key dialectical tensions: (1) flexibility as both freedom and control; (2) gig work as promizing autonomy but delivering insecurity; and (3) the gig economy as simultaneously embedded in and excluded from Sweden’s labour market model, undermining protections whilst reproducing exclusion. Through digital mediation, task atomization, and misclassification, gig work entrenches inequality in new ways. In Sweden, Europe’s most segregated labour market, the gig economy exacerbates existing divisions. Whilst some workers benefit, others, particularly racialized migrants, face deepened precarity and algorithmic discipline. Rather than disrupting hierarchies, Sweden’s gig economy reinforces them through new forms of segmentation and spatio-temporal discipline.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2026. p. 1-18
Keywords [en]
Gig economy flexibility segmentation dialectics
National Category
Human Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-586538DOI: 10.1080/04353684.2026.2662282Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105036562861OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-586538DiVA, id: diva2:2061008
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and WelfareAvailable from: 2026-05-20 Created: 2026-05-20 Last updated: 2026-07-16
In thesis
1. Fragmented Lives and Labour: Uneven Incorporation of Platform Work in Sweden
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Fragmented Lives and Labour: Uneven Incorporation of Platform Work in Sweden
2026 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis examines platform-mediated gig work in Sweden as a differentiated and internally contradictory labour regime. Through qualitative interviews with gig workers, supplemented by ethnographic observations and analyses of policy, media, platform, and union material, the thesis explores how platform labour is structured, governed, and experienced. It investigates how contradictions between flexibility and control, autonomy and constraint, and innovation and exploitation emerge through processes of labour market segmentation, digital mediation, spatio-temporal organisation, and platform urbanisation. Drawing on labour geography, Marxist political economy, and Marxist-feminist approaches, the thesis conceptualises platform-mediated gig work not as a singular or exceptional form of work, but as an intensification and reorganisation of longer-standing dynamics of labour market inequality, exploitation, and spatio-temporal discipline. 

The thesis consists of four research articles. Article I examines labour market segmentation in the Swedish gig economy. It shows that flexibility operates dialectically as both a potential source of autonomy and a mechanism of control, and that experiences of precarity are shaped by workers’ differential positions within labour markets and broader social relations. Article II explores the spatio-temporal organisation of gig work. It argues that the flexibility afforded to platforms and customers depends upon the spatial and temporal inflexibility of workers, particularly migrant workers in cleaning and delivery, who must be available both “just-in-time” and “just-in-place”. Article III examines labour agency through the framework of resilience, reworking, and resistance. It finds that agency is not absent in platform labour, but fragmented and unevenly organised through the spatio-temporal logics of platform work. Resilience emerges under conditions of compression and isolation, reworking through partial decompression, and resistance through fragile moments of synchronisation. Article IV develops the concept of spectral infrastructures to explore how platform urbanism reorganises urban space, visibility, and labour. It demonstrates that the apparent frictionlessness of on-demand consumption depends upon the uneven visibility of the workers and infrastructures that sustain everyday urban life.

It is concluded that platform-mediated gig work in Sweden constitutes a differentiated labour regime organised through contradiction. Across the papers, the conditions that enable flexibility, autonomy, visibility, and mobility for some workers simultaneously generate insecurity, waiting, opacity, and constraint for others. These contradictions are experienced unevenly and are disproportionately borne by differently positioned workers. The findings further suggest that platform labour develops through existing labour market structures, reproducing inequalities associated with migration status, labour market position, and access to social and institutional protections. The thesis therefore argues that platform labour reconfigures rather than transcends existing inequalities, reproducing uneven conditions of work through digitally mediated forms of organisation, coordination, and control.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Department of Human Geography, Uppsala University, 2026. p. 137
Series
Geographica, ISSN 0431-2023 ; 45
Keywords
Platform labour, labour regimes, gig economy, segmentation, agency, space-time, dialectics, Sweden.
National Category
Human Geography
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-586680 (URN)978-91-506-3182-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2026-09-04, Sal IX, Universitetshuset, Uppsala, 09:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2026-06-12 Created: 2026-05-21 Last updated: 2026-06-22

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Butler, Olivia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Butler, Olivia
By organisation
Department of Human Geography
In the same journal
Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography
Human Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 14 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf