Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparing Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Parkinson Disease Management and Digital Technologies: Exploratory International Survey
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group.ORCID iD: 0009-0000-2442-2775
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0908-6173
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0205-1165
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: JMIR Formative Research, E-ISSN 2561-326X, Vol. 10, p. e90377-e90377Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Parkinson disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that poses complex challenges for persons with PD, informal caregivers, and health care professionals. With growing interest in digital and predictive artificial intelligence (AI) tools for disease management, understanding the needs and digital readiness of these stakeholder groups is crucial. Objective: This work aims to (1) identify digital practices for PD management among persons with PD, at-risk individuals, caregivers, and health care professionals; (2) compare these practices across groups; (3) explore stakeholder desires for AI-based tools; and (4) assess alignments and gaps to inform tailored AI solutions. Methods: An anonymous cross-sectional online survey of an exploratory nature was distributed (from December 2024 to October 2025) in 5 languages and completed by 255 respondents. Descriptive statistics summarized responses to 41 questions, including stakeholder-specific items. χ2 tests were performed to examine stakeholder differences in desired AI features. Results: Interest in predictive AI was high across stakeholder groups. Symptom tracking was the most desired feature (selected by more than 76% of the respondents), and personalized treatment recommendations came second for both persons with PD and health care professionals; however, stakeholder priorities diverged in other areas. Health care professionals rated improving patient and informal caregiver engagement as significantly more important than persons with PD did, χ21 (n=205)=34.78, P<.001, and Cramer V=0.41. Despite considerable interest, the reported use of digital tools was limited, as most persons with PD did not use symptom-tracking apps or wearables, nor were they currently monitoring their condition, although many expressed intentions to begin. Conclusions: While predictive AI tools were viewed positively across groups, there were significant gaps in stakeholder preferences, highlighting the importance of tailored, context-aware design. Early diagnosis was not prioritized by persons with PD or health care professionals, likely reflecting the complexity of diagnosing PD in the absence of disease-modifying therapies. Coupled with the emphasis placed on preventive lifestyle guidance by persons with PD and those at risk, this highlights the importance of actionability in AI-based monitoring and prediction. Such actionability may also enhance perceived relevance and uptake, given that reported interest in digital health tools and self-tracking exceeded actual use. These findings offer early-stage insight to guide the development of future AI-based solutions for PD.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
JMIR Publications, 2026. Vol. 10, p. e90377-e90377
Keywords [en]
artificial intelligence, AI, Parkinson disease, stakeholder perspectives, patient perspectives, self-care, predictive AI
National Category
Medical Informatics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-586770DOI: 10.2196/90377ISI: 001814024400008PubMedID: 42160536Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105042442512OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-586770DiVA, id: diva2:2061684
Available from: 2026-05-22 Created: 2026-05-22 Last updated: 2026-07-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(345 kB)65 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 345 kBChecksum SHA-512
a80d024c7f40ed6221dedf5ef0191a0089a0d1bdea5fcfc38a17c43f36a924da217a59fbb48f5903b81bc2723397f8f773e7db2bb13e0db55ef2ec002426627d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Luckhaus, JamieKharko, AnnaBlease, CharlotteHägglund, MariaRiggare, SaraScott Duncan, Therese

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Luckhaus, JamieKharko, AnnaBlease, CharlotteHägglund, MariaRiggare, SaraScott Duncan, Therese
By organisation
Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research GroupCentre for Disability Research
In the same journal
JMIR Formative Research
Medical Informatics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 34 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf