Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fosfomycin versus ciprofloxacin for transrectal prostate biopsy: An open randomised controlled multicentre drug trial
Univ Gothenburg, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden.;Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden..
Linköping Univ, Dept Biomed & Clin Sci, Linköping, Sweden..
Örebro Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Örebro, Sweden..
Linköping Univ, Dept Biomed & Clin Sci, Linköping, Sweden..
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: The Journal of Clinical Urology, ISSN 2051-4158, E-ISSN 2051-4166, Vol. 19, no 2, p. 170-177Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective:

Antibiotic prophylaxis reduces infection risk following transrectal prostate biopsy. Studies in countries with high antibiotic resistance show that fosfomycin, given an hour or more before biopsy, has equal or better outcomes than ciprofloxacin. This study aimed to evaluate if fosfomycin, administered immediately before biopsy, is as effective as ciprofloxacin in Sweden, where antibiotic resistance is low.

Material and Methods:

A randomised, non-inferiority study of different antibiotic prophylactic regimes, including men undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy, was conducted. A total of 3448 patients were planned to be included. Primary outcome was hospitalisation due to urinary tract infection (UTI) within 14 days. Men without risk factors for infection received either fosfomycin or ciprofloxacin immediately before biopsy. Patients with risk factors received additional doses post-biopsy.

Results:

The study was stopped by the safety board after enrolment of 42 men. Four of 20 men (25%) in the fosfomycin group were hospitalised due to UTI, including two with positive blood cultures for Pseudomonas, whereas no hospitalisations (0%) occurred in the ciprofloxacin group. The main limitation was the small sample size.

Conclusion:Fosfomycin administered immediately before biopsy was not supported by this study. The results may be skewed by the high incidence of Pseudomonas infections.

Level of evidence:

2

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2026. Vol. 19, no 2, p. 170-177
Keywords [en]
Prostate biopsy, fosfomycin, urological infections, antibiotic prophylaxis, prostate cancer, prostate
National Category
Urology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-589315DOI: 10.1177/20514158251376398ISI: 001590581500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105019244608OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-589315DiVA, id: diva2:2070809
Part of project
Alternatives to Ciprofloxacin in urological infektions, Swedish Research Council
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2019-05913_VRVinnovaAvailable from: 2026-06-12 Created: 2026-06-12 Last updated: 2026-08-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(234 kB)38 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 234 kBChecksum SHA-512
c3df48b16c56dbbde18f8debe48668e9f9bb0e6b15acf5b1fc973bfa9f15f5e3affe68b0fba3fbd2a1a3cf97176f7f01c591343d53b808676cfd3bd0754ed96f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Stattin, Pär

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stattin, Pär
By organisation
Urology
In the same journal
The Journal of Clinical Urology
Urology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 229 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf