Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Attributing the impacts of ecological engineering and climate change on carbon uptake in Northeastern China
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Landscape Ecology, ISSN 0921-2973, E-ISSN 1572-9761, Vol. 38, no 12, p. 3945-3960Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Context

In the past decades, several ecological engineering (eco-engineering) programs have been conducted in China, leading to a significant increase in regional carbon sink. However, the contribution of different eco-engineering programs to carbon uptake is still not clear, as the location of different programs is difficult to identify, and their impacts are concurrent with climate change.

Objectives

We aim to detect the location of eco-engineering programs and attribute the impacts of eco-engineering and climate change on vegetation dynamics and carbon uptake in Northeastern China during 2000–2020.

Methods

We developed a new framework to detect the location of eco-engineering programs by combining a temporal pattern analysis method and Markov model, and to attribute the impacts of eco-engineering and climate change on vegetation greenness and carbon uptake by combining a neighbor contrast method within a sliding window and trend analysis on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and gross primary production (GPP).

Results

We identified four main forestry eco-engineering programs: croplands to forest (CtoF), grasslands to forest (GtoF), savannas to forest (StoF), and natural forest conservation (NFC) programs, whose areas accounted for 2.11%, 1.89%, 3.41%, and 1.72% of the total study area, respectively. Both eco-engineering and climate change contributed to the increase in greenness and carbon uptake. Compared to climate change effect, eco-engineering increased NDVI and GPP by 121% and 21.43% on average, respectively. Specifically, the eco-engineering-induced increases in GPP were 54.1%, 9.46%, 8.13%, and 24.20% for CtoF, GtoF, StoF, and NFC, respectively.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the important and direct contribution of eco-engineering on vegetation greening with positive effects on carbon sequestration at a fine scale, providing an important implication for eco-engineering planning and management towards a carbon-neutral future.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2023. Vol. 38, no 12, p. 3945-3960
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-510439DOI: 10.1007/s10980-023-01679-xISI: 000991191900003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85160231841OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-510439DiVA, id: diva2:1792607
Funder
Swedish National Space Board, 2021-00111Available from: 2023-08-29 Created: 2023-08-29 Last updated: 2025-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Wu, Minchao

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wu, Minchao
By organisation
Air, Water and Landscape Sciences
In the same journal
Landscape Ecology
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 73 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf