Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Operative versus Nonoperative Treatment of Proximal Hamstring Avulsions
Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm;Department of Orthopedics, Danderyds Hospital, Stockholm.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedics and Handsurgery.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo;Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: NEJM Evidence, E-ISSN 2766-5526, Vol. 3, no 8Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Operative treatment is widely used for acute proximal hamstring avulsions, but its effectiveness compared with that of nonoperative treatment has not been shown in randomized trials.

Methods: In this noninferiority trial at 10 centers in Sweden and Norway, we enrolled patients 30 to 70 years of age with a proximal hamstring avulsion in a randomized trial and a parallel observational cohort. Treatments were operative reinsertion of the tendons or nonoperative management. The primary end point was the Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT) at 2 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included scores on the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS).

Results: A total of 119 patients were enrolled in the randomized trial and 97 patients in the observational cohort. In the per-protocol analysis of the randomized trial, the mean (±standard deviation) PHAT scores were 79.9±19.5 and 78.5±19.4 in the operative and nonoperative groups, respectively (PHAT scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher function). The prespecified noninferiority limit of 10 points was not crossed (mean difference, −1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], −8.6 to 6.2; P=0.009 for noninferiority). Analyses of secondary outcomes, including a mean difference in the LEFS score of −1.6 (95% CI, −5.2 to 2.0), aligned with the primary outcome. The observed numbers of adverse events in the randomized trial were nine in the operative group versus three in the nonoperative group (odds ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.2). In the analysis of the observational cohort, the mean PHAT score difference between the nonoperative and operative treatment groups was −2.6 (95% CI, −9.9 to 4.6).

Conclusions: In patients 30 to 70 years of age with proximal hamstring avulsions, nonoperative treatment was noninferior to operative treatment. (Funded by Afa Försäkring and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03311997.)

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Massachusetts Medical Society , 2024. Vol. 3, no 8
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-539058DOI: 10.1056/evidoa2400056ISI: 001534722600009OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-539058DiVA, id: diva2:1900554
Available from: 2024-09-24 Created: 2024-09-24 Last updated: 2026-02-02Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Proximal hamstring avulsions: Epidemiology, MRI-imaging and treatment outcomes
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Proximal hamstring avulsions: Epidemiology, MRI-imaging and treatment outcomes
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Proximal hamstring avulsion (PHA) is an injury mostly occurring with slip-and fall accidents. MRI is important for the diagnosis, and MRI-findings together with patient characteristics are used for the allocation of treatment, but little is known about their prognostic value. The treatment can be either operative or nonoperative, but the evidence for the treatment options is limited. There is also no data on incidence and on trends in treatment of hamstring injuries, including PHA.

In paper I we analyzed data from the Swedish National Patient Register between 2001 and 2020 for patients aged 18–90 diagnosed with hamstring injuries (ICD-10 code S76.3), with operative treatment identified using the NOMESCO classification NFL49. The incidence of hamstring injuries increased from 2.2 to 7.3 per 100,000 person-years between 2001 and 2020, with the rate of surgical treatment rising from 3.0% to 14.2%.

In paper II we conducted a survey of 125 orthopedic surgeons from Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark to explore current practices and rationales for PHA treatment decisions. Surgical decision-making was largely influenced by patient-specific factors, including age, BMI and lifestyle, and MRI-findings such as, degree of tendon retraction and number of avulsed tendons.

In paper III we conducted a randomized noninferiority trial at 10 centers that compared operative tendon reinsertion versus non-operative management in patients aged 30–70 with PHA. The primary outcome was the Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT) at 24 months. The RCT demonstrated that nonoperative treatment was noninferior to surgery in terms of PHAT, but also in secondary outcomes, such as Lower Extremity Functional Scores (LEFS) and functional test, and with more adverse events in the operative group.

In paper IV we investigated if MRI findings at time of diagnosis had an association with muscle degeneration at 24 months of follow up with tendon retraction emerging as a key factor in predicting muscle degeneration in nonoperatively treated patients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2024. p. 60
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 2085
Keywords
PHA, proximal hamstring, MRI, hamstring
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-539140 (URN)978-91-513-2257-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2024-11-29, Enghoffsalen, Akademiska sjukhuset, ing 50, Uppsala, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-11-08 Created: 2024-09-29 Last updated: 2024-11-08

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Laszlo, SofiaJonsson, Kenneth B

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Laszlo, SofiaJonsson, Kenneth B
By organisation
Orthopaedics and Handsurgery
In the same journal
NEJM Evidence
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 234 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf