Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Factors influencing locoregional recurrence rates in locally advanced rectal cancer after total neoadjuvant treatment versus chemoradiotherapy in the RAPIDO trial
Maastricht Univ, Sch Oncol & Reprod, GROW, Maastricht, Netherlands.;Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands.;Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Leiden, Netherlands..
Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Cancer precision medicine.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5440-791x
Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Nijmegen, Netherlands..
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: British Journal of Surgery, ISSN 0007-1323, E-ISSN 1365-2168, Vol. 112, no 9, article id znaf190Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The RAPIDO trial compared total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), both followed by total mesorectal excision, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). A higher locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate was observed after TNT. This study investigates factors contributing to the difference in LRR observed.

Method: Patients with high-risk LARC received TNT (5 x 5 Gy followed by 6 x CAPOX or 9 x FOLFOX4) or CRT (25-28 x 1.8-2 Gy with concurrent capecitabine). Patients with a local R0 or R1 resection were included in this study. Sphincter-preserving surgery encompassed (low) anterior resection and Hartmann's procedure. The influence of baseline, surgical and pathological factors on LRR was evaluated.

Results: Of 920 randomized patients, 849 (430 versus 419 in the TNT and CRT arms) were eligible. The cumulative incidence of LRR at 8 years was 10.8% after TNT and 5.8% after CRT (HR 1.91). Following sphincter preserving surgery, 12.1% (TNT) and 4.8% (CRT) developed LRR (HR 2.60), compared to 8.5% versus 7.5%, respectively, after abdominoperineal resection. Distal resection margin rates (DRM) of 10 mm or less after sphincter-preserving surgery were similar in both arms (TNT 17.5% versus CRT 22.1%). However, a higher cumulative incidence of LRR was observed with a DRM of 10 mm or less after TNT (25.4% versus 1.8%; HR 15.51). Other factors were similar between treatment arms with respect to LRR.

Conclusion: The difference in LRR between TNT and CRT mainly occurred in patients treated with sphincter-preserving surgery. Baseline information on the original tumour bed should be considered when determining the surgical approach after total neoadjuvant treatment. The difference in LRR between TNT and CRT mainly occurred in patients treated with sphincter-preserving surgery. Baseline information on the original tumour bed should be considered when determining the surgical approach after total neoadjuvant treatment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2025. Vol. 112, no 9, article id znaf190
National Category
Cancer and Oncology Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-569208DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf190ISI: 001582856400001PubMedID: 41020329OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-569208DiVA, id: diva2:2005808
Funder
Swedish Cancer SocietySwedish Research Council, K2014-99X-22481-01-3EU, Horizon 2020, 857894-CASTAvailable from: 2025-10-10 Created: 2025-10-10 Last updated: 2025-10-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Glimelius, Bengt

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Glimelius, Bengt
By organisation
Cancer precision medicine
In the same journal
British Journal of Surgery
Cancer and OncologySurgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 48 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf