Why do significant others of people with aphasia accept or decline participation in communication partner training? A pilot study
Background and aims: Communication partner training (CPT) is an evidence-based aphasia intervention that is strongly recommended in Swedish clinical guidelines for stroke care [1]. However, clinicians report that many significant others (SOs) decline participation [2]. There is limited research on the SOs’ perspectives and experiences of CPT, especially regarding the factors that could make them decline the training. This study aims to explore why SOs accept or decline CPT in Sweden, and what factors influence the decision to participate or not.
Methods: Interviews with four SOs who had been offered CPT, two of which had completed CPT and two that had declined participation. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis.
Results and main contribution: Reasons for not taking part were Practical barriers (long distances, training during work hours, own health problems) and Doubtful to effect of CPT (communication is already working well, too severe aphasia). Factors which could affect the decision were Time when CPT was offered (time post-onset of aphasia, recurring offers during rehabilitation), Experiences of earlier aphasia therapy, Perception of the speech-language pathologist (SLP), and How CPT was introduced.
Conclusions: The decision to accept or decline CPT is affected by several factors, not only practical issues. However, to better understand the SOs’ perspectives and experiences of CPT, future studies with larger samples are needed.Implications: Although being a pilot study with few participants, the result contributes with insights of the importance of a good relationship with the SLP and trust in his/her competence in addition to how CPT is presented.
References:
1. National Board of Health and Welfare. (2020). Nationella riktlinjer för vård vid stroke: stöd för styrning och ledning. Socialstyrelsens publikationsservice. https://www.socialstyrelsen. se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/nationella-riktlinjer/2020-1-6545.pdf
2. Persson, K. J. et al. (2022). Do best practice recommendations align with current aphasia practices in the Swedish care context: a national survey. Aphasiology, 36(8), 903–920. doi:10.1080/02687038.2021.1917504